[bookport] Re: new unit proposal
- From: Chris Hill <hillco@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2005 21:43:24 -0500
Space bars are on the bottom row in the middle. Enter is right key
second row, escape is left. Arrows are between them.
Bottom row has dots 7 at one end and 8 at the other, and goes dot 7,
backspace, space, space, delete, dot 8.
On Fri, 16 Sep 2005 19:35:48 -0700, you wrote:
>Speaking of taking notes, I have not tried this, and don't figure it
>will ever be the primary use for the unit, but, although I definitely
>understood the top row of keys, I have some confusion about the next two
>rows, I know there are two space bars and arrow and enter keys but where
>exactly are they? I found reading the appendices in the back of the
>manual seemed to confuse me even more, not hard to do late at night
>after a long week.
>
>
>
>Rose Combs
>rosecombs@xxxxxxxxx
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>[mailto:bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Chris Hill
>Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2005 7:56 AM
>To: bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: [bookport] Re: new unit proposal
>
>
>It has a note taking feature, no reason that a calculator couldn't be
>done for little to no cost. I bought my bookport to read with, but
>since it can carry my notes file which has all my phone numbers in it,
>it is morphing into a personal information manager, which is great since
>I can't seem to remember a phone number unless I knew it ten years ago
>or dial it half a dozen times a week. A calculator would be handy once
>in a while, once in a while I'm given to coming up with complex problems
>I'd like to solve without driving myself nuts.
>
>
>On Thu, 15 Sep 2005 09:34:28 -0500, you wrote:
>
>>This is my opinion, and I'm not putting anyone down for thinking
>>differently. I don't like the calculator idea at all. Talking
>calculators
>>are relatively inexpensive.
>>
>>At 08:48 AM 9/15/2005, you wrote:
>>>I like the calculator idea. I think the synthesizer idea has outlived
>
>>>its usefulness with all the speech programs I know of installing their
>
>>>own software speech these days.
>>>
>>>
>>>On Thu, 15 Sep 2005 08:22:13 -0500, you wrote:
>>>
>>> >Think of how much more useful the unit could be. I know doubletalk
>>> >would probably charge money for the synth option, but it could all
>>> >be done in firmware, maybe there could be a special firmware users
>>> >would have to pay for if they wanted the synth. The calculator I
>>> >think should be more considered, it would hardly take any extra
>>> >space nor time to develop at least a simple one; and we all could
>>> >use a calculator now and then.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >-----Original Message-----
>>> >From: bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> >[mailto:bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
>>> >On Behalf Of David Allen
>>> >Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2005 5:57 AM
>>> >To: bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> >Subject: [bookport] Re: new unit proposal
>>> >
>>> >Hi Kevin and list:
>>> >
>>> >Yes, both have been thought of. Neither is justified in the context
>>> >of a portable device whose reason for being is to read books. If you
>
>>> >still need a
>>> >
>>> >USB synthesiser, it is available as the Tripple talk.
>>> >
>>> >Cheers,
>>> >Dave
>>> >
>>> >
>>
>>Sandy Licht
>>Phone: 409-898-8218
>>Jeremiah 29:11 - 14A
>>11For I know the plans I have for you," says the LORD. "They are plans
>>for good and not for disaster, to give you a future and a hope. 12In
>>those days when you pray, I will listen. 13If you look for me in
>>earnest, you will find me when you seek me. 14I will be found by you,"
>says the
>>LORD...
>>
>
>
>
>
>
Other related posts:
