[bookport] Re: new unit proposal
- From: "Julia Cosgrove (Mrs.)" <j.cosgrove@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 22:33:04 +0100
I agree.
To this end, I would like to suggest a dictionary manager although, I rather
think that this would be too much for the Book Port.
Julia.
>Great post and I agree totally. I personally find that far too often people
>make assumptions that are not based on fact at all thereby coming to
>erroneous conclusions. Let the real experts, those that produce the unit,
>decide what can or can't be done. Personally, I'd love to see folks be able
>to voice their ideas without being knocked down so quickly, especially with
>assertions that are not based on solid knowledge. Just my humble opinion of
>course.
>
>
>
>
>
>--Best regards,
>
>--Rick Alfaro
>--rick.alfaro@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
>On Behalf Of Gary Wunder
>Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2005 12:27 PM
>To: bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: [bookport] Re: new unit proposal
>
>Folks, I'd like to respectfully suggest that when new features are presented
>here we ought to limit our comments about them simply to whether we like
>them or how better to implement them. I don't think it is our place to worry
>about the capacity of the unit - APH and Springer know about those things
>and if it can't be done, it won't. If APH doesn't think a feature will be
>worth enough in potential sales to justify implementing it, then that's
>their decision.
>
>I'd prefer to see more questions and less about reactions to reactions to
>feature suggestions. Can we refrain from telling one another the function of
>the BookPort, how some of us live in the stone age, and how still others
>want the BP to do everything. We have a wonderful product, a fantastic
>support team, and a list which has been a real source of good feedback and
>an instrument for learning. Let's not let it become a vehicle for argument
>please.
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.11.0/103 - Release Date: 15/09/05
Other related posts:
