I think a basic calculator would be great. Margo and Elmo ----- Original Message ----- From: Kevin Jones To: bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2005 6:14 PM Subject: [bookport] Re: new unit proposal i think it should just be an all-encompassing portable device yes it reads books wonderfully but it shouldn't only be able to do that. -----Original Message----- From: bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Sandy Licht Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2005 4:53 PM To: bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [bookport] Re: new unit proposal I certainly need that one! At 04:00 PM 9/21/2005, you wrote: >My only question is, is the Bookport a device whose design is primarily >for reading either audio or text? >If so, what does a calculator have to do with reading? >Supporting larger audio/mp3 files, that makes sense. >Faster processing of audio files by the transfer tool, that makes sense. >A calculator simply doesn't seem to fit the purpose for the device. >I could even see an alarm feature, since reading is such a wonderful >escape. >One might wish to have an alarm to advise you that you've read long >enough and that it is time to do some real work! >(smile) > >-----Original Message----- >From: bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >[mailto:bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of LARRY SKUTCHAN >Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2005 2:01 PM >To: bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >Subject: [bookport] Re: new unit proposal > > >No, it would not increase the price nor hinder any other function in any >way. > > > >>> slicht@xxxxxxxxx Thursday, September 15, 2005 12:18:35 PM >>> >I'll answer your question with a question. What about it, Larry, >Pamela, >Rob? Would a calculator increase BP's price or hinder the firmware in >any >way? If not, I guess it would be okay to have. My math is so bad, I >might >even use it once in a blue moon. > >At 10:37 AM 9/15/2005, you wrote: > >Here's my question to you. First of all, I don't care about a >calculator > >myself. But: If a calculator were added, if the calculator did not > >increase the price, if other functionality were not impaired, would >you > >have any objection to its being there? I ask this because, on the Book > > >Courier list, someone was saying that one of the benefits of the BC of >the > >BP was that the BC doesn't have a notetaker function, which that >person > >doesn't need. To which my response would be, As long as it doesn't get >in > >the way, what's the problem with having it there? I say the same thing > > >about a calculator feature which, as I've said, I can take or leave. >If a > >calculator function will increase the price, that's another issue, or >if > >it will decrease room for firmware revisions that would enhancing the >book > >reading experience, that's another story as well. But if any given >feature > >does not get in one's way, why not include it? I'm not referring to >anyone > >here specificaly, but the attitude I see time and time again on the > >various lists I'm on is that "if I don't use it, it's a bad idea." >That's > >why descriptive video is not as prevalent, especially in the States, >as it > >should be. > > > >Bruce > > > >-- > >Bruce Toews > >E-mail and MSN/Windows Messenger: dogriver@xxxxxxxx > >Web Site (including info on my weekly commentaries): >http://www.ogts.net > >Info on the Best TV Show of All Time: http://www.cornergas.com > > > >On Thu, 15 Sep 2005, Sandy Licht wrote: > > > >>This is my opinion, and I'm not putting anyone down for thinking > >>differently. I don't like the calculator idea at all. Talking > >>calculators are relatively inexpensive. > >> > >>At 08:48 AM 9/15/2005, you wrote: > >>>I like the calculator idea. I think the synthesizer idea has >outlived > >>>its usefulness with all the speech programs I know of installing >their > >>>own software speech these days. > >>> > >>>On Thu, 15 Sep 2005 08:22:13 -0500, you wrote: > >>> > Think of how much more useful the unit could be. I know >doubletalk would > >>> > probably charge money for the synth option, but it could all be >done in > >>> > firmware, maybe there could be a special firmware users would >have to pay > >>> > for if they wanted the synth. > >>> > The calculator I think should be more considered, it would hardly > > >>> take > any > >>> > extra space nor time to develop at least a simple one; and we all > > >>> could > use > >>> > a calculator now and then. > >>> > > > -----Original Message----- > >>> > From: bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > >>> [mailto:bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] > >>> > On Behalf Of David Allen > >>> > Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2005 5:57 AM > >>> > To: bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > >>> > Subject: [bookport] Re: new unit proposal > >>> > > Hi Kevin and list: > >>> > > Yes, both have been thought of. Neither is justified in the >context > >>> of a > >>> > portable device whose reason for being is to read books. If you > >>> still > need a > >>> > > USB synthesiser, it is available as the Tripple talk. > >>> > > Cheers, > >>> > Dave > >>> > > > >> > >>Sandy Licht > >>Phone: 409-898-8218 > >>Jeremiah 29:11 - 14A > >>11For I know the plans I have for you," says the LORD. "They > >>are plans for good and not for disaster, to give you a future and a >hope. > >>12In those days when you pray, I will listen. 13If you look for me in >earnest, > >>you will find me when you seek me. 14I will be found by you," says >the > >>LORD... > >> > >Sandy Licht >Phone: 409-898-8218 >Jeremiah 29:11 - 14A >11For I know the plans I have for you," says the LORD. "They >are plans for good and not for disaster, to give you a future and a >hope. >12In those days when you pray, I will listen. 13If you look for me in >earnest, >you will find me when you seek me. 14I will be found by you," says the > >LORD... Sandy Licht Phone: 409-898-8218 Jeremiah 29:11 - 14A 11For I know the plans I have for you," says the LORD. "They are plans for good and not for disaster, to give you a future and a hope. 12In those days when you pray, I will listen. 13If you look for me in earnest, you will find me when you seek me. 14I will be found by you," says the LORD...