I'm happy with my perfectly working, old, doubletalk enabled original bookport. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Hubert Renaud" <hrenaud@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Tuesday, February 09, 2010 11:01 PM Subject: [bookport] Re: new book port
I will now be getting the Book Sense because of the voices. -----Original Message----- From: bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Brandon Misch Sent: Tuesday, February 09, 2010 8:27 PM To: bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [bookport] Re: new book port well, you could get the booksense wich has clearer speech. On Feb 9, 2010, at 1:30 PM, Shell wrote:for a new port. I'm absolutely devastated that these voices will be used inI didn't get the stream, because I hated the voices and decided to waitthe new machines. So, that's it for me, I won't be buying one now.Shell. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Curtis Delzer" <curtis@xxxxxxxxxx> To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Tuesday, February 09, 2010 5:11 PM Subject: [bookport] Re: new book portOh please, why the Samantha, Tom, etc. voices? PLEASE! Why not justremain with DoubleTalk voice instead, it's better than that! DoubleTalk isdesigned with Text in mind, has been for many years and you could then alsomake the device an external USB supported synthesizer with just some additional configuration. Even then a dictionary for words could be added with double-tap keystrokes for changing pronunciation of mispronouncedwords, etc. Is memory considerations why those voices were chosen? There arejust so many better choices than these voices!Curtis Delzer. HS.-- I am using the free version of SPAMfighter. We are a community of 6 million users fighting spam. SPAMfighter has removed 2089 of my spam emails to date. Get the free SPAMfighter here: http://www.spamfighter.com/len The Professional version does not have this messageNo virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 9.0.733 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2678 - Release Date: 02/09/10 14:35:00