Remember that only applies to audio files, not to text files. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bruce Toews" <DogRiver@xxxxxxxx> To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2006 1:04 AM Subject: [bookport] Re: navigating audio files One thing you can use is the command whose name totally escapes me at the moment that lets you move backward or forward by a predetermined increment, as set in, well, in the settings menu. Oh man I need some sleep. But you can set it to move by a predetermined number of seconds either way: 1+2 moves you backwards, 2+3 moves you forward. It's not perfect, but it is useful. Bruce -- Bruce Toews E-mail and MSN/Windows Messenger: DogRiver@xxxxxxxx Web Site (including info on my weekly commentaries): http://www.ogts.net Info on the Best TV Show of All Time: http://www.cornergas.com On Mon, 6 Feb 2006, DOC wrote: > that sounds great too. I was thinking of something that will allow me to > move backward to find the place I lost after bumping the unit. Usually I > lock it but a couple of times I didn't have enough time to do so and after > finding my seat on the bus found that I was near the beginning of the > book. > I noticed it doesn't mind moving forward but it really seems to hate > backing > up. > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Bruce Toews" <DogRiver@xxxxxxxx> > To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Monday, February 06, 2006 10:45 PM > Subject: [bookport] Re: navigating audio files > > >> What movement would you like to see? I'm hoping for a seek-to-time >> feature, as well as a feature that remembers the farthest point you've >> gotten to in a file. >> >> Bruce >> >> -- >> Bruce Toews >> E-mail and MSN/Windows Messenger: DogRiver@xxxxxxxx >> Web Site (including info on my weekly commentaries): http://www.ogts.net >> Info on the Best TV Show of All Time: http://www.cornergas.com >> >> On Mon, 6 Feb 2006, DOC wrote: >> >>> Will there be any improvement in moving back and forward in audio files? >>> ----- Original Message ----- >>> From: "Mike Arrigo" <n0oxy@xxxxxxxxxxx> >>> To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> Sent: Monday, February 06, 2006 5:35 PM >>> Subject: [bookport] speech >>> >>> >>>> Since we're talking about the new unit, speech might be worth > discussing. >>> My >>>> vote would be for doubletalk or eloquence. Of course, everyone has > their >>>> favorites, and there's no way you're going to please everyone, but > that's >>> my >>>> vote. Perhaps the new units could have 2 speech engines like the >>>> braillenotes do >>>> >>> >>> >>> >> > > >