That's as may be but the public is always right, so I have been told by
those who sell products, so if the public in this instance overwhelmingly
supports this concept, APH had better do it before someone else does
regardless of codes and all that other computerese.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Walt Smith" <walt@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2006 6:56 AM
Subject: [bookport] Re: feature idea
Yep--and all of this takes up lines of code and reduces the amount of space
available in the Book Port's memory for truly important things that are
actually related to its basic function and that doesn't duplicate something
that's already easily available.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Michael Bowman-Jones" <mikebowmanjones@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, June 18, 2006 6:06 PM
Subject: [bookport] Re: feature idea
Greetings, All.
Why not set the parameters so the user could decide (a) if he did/did not
want to use the function: (b) if he/she did want to use it, when it would be
used (I would think at the end of a session but not necessarily all
sessions; and (c) where on the PC/laptop the information should be
stored--My Docs, Desktop,My Computer, etc. For those who proclaim their
status by indicating they already have a procesws and it is the problem for
us "lazy" types to solve, they can continue to use the multi-step system
they are comfortable with and ignore it.
As for other improvements that should be made first, as a brand new user, I
cannot speak to that issue. However, particularly as a new user, I think
the security of knowing there is a simple way to back up my stuff would be a
higher priority than some of the tinkering withh existing functions that may
or may not be used by everybody.
Michael Bowman-Jones
__________ NOD32 1.1610 (20060620) Information __________
This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system. http://www.eset.com
