[bookport] Re: feature idea
- From: "Don Barrett" <donter@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2006 07:57:43 -0400
Yes, you are right on the money; the Restore function is a must or the idea
is useless.
Thanks.
Don
-----Original Message-----
From: bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of David Tanner
Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2006 1:46 AM
To: bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [bookport] Re: feature idea
Well, I was going to say that they might because not every Book Port user
has the computer knowledge to be able to reliably do the job manually. But
then if that is the case, how would they retrieve the backup if they needed
it put back on their Book Port unless the backup utility also has a restore
function. And, without the restore function then the backup utility
probably really isn't worth considering.
So, Mr. Don, may I suggest a backup feature that has backup and restore.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Rich Ring" <ring2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, June 18, 2006 10:28 PM
Subject: [bookport] Re: feature idea
: You don't mince words, but you are probably right.
:
: ----- Original Message -----
: From: "Missy Hoppe" <melissah@xxxxxxxx>
: To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
: Sent: Friday, June 16, 2006 8:14 PM
: Subject: [bookport] Re: feature idea
:
:
: Yes, and the question becomes, if people are too lazy to back up a folder
: manually, why would they use a back-up feature if it was built into the bp
: transfer software.
: I think APH would be wiser to spend time on more unique features that
: aren't easily achieved via other means.
: Missy
:
:
:
:
:
: --
: No virus found in this incoming message.
: Checked by AVG Free Edition.
: Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.9.0/368 - Release Date: 6/16/2006
:
:
Other related posts:
