[bookport] Re: digital voice recorders V. the Book Port?
- From: "Gary Wunder" <gwunder@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 07:31:29 -0600
I bought my wife such a recorder for school although she is the
one in our family with a BookPort. The recorder you have can
record good quality lectures and has several hours of recording
time. The software transfer is also good and the unit is truly
pocket size. Having a speaker means it is also good if you want
to record something on the fly and then listen to verify you have
it - I record my checks with one of these things and the BP,
given it requires headphones, just wouldn't do the trick.
Gary
----- Original Message -----
From: "albert griffith" <albertgriffith@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, February 21, 2005 7:23 PM
Subject: [bookport] digital voice recorders V. the Book Port?
My wife just purchased a, Olympus DS330, digital voice recorder
for me as a
surprise. However, I already have a Book Port. Since the DS330
costs
around $150, I don't want to keep it if there are some obvious
accessibility
drawbacks any of you know about. I'd also appreciate any input
regarding
success any of you have had using your B.P. as an address/phone
book. The
recorder also comes with a docking station and playback software
but I don't
want to open it for fear of not being able to return it. thanks
I usually
like surprises, too! smile
Other related posts:
