[bookport] Re: compact flash card sizes
- From: "PAMELA RADER" <PRADER@xxxxxxx>
- To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 14:26:00 -0400
It would only format to FAT 16, so you'd only end up with half the
capacity. And, we have not tested it with 4 gigs, so we can't
comfortably support using it. Save your money and go with 2 gigs.
Pamela
>>> srobertson4@xxxxxxxxx 04/14/05 12:06PM >>>
If you bought a 4 gb card that has fat32 instead of fat16 could this
card be
formated in the book port and would it then work?
Thanks.
Steve
----- Original Message -----
From: "ROB MEREDITH" <rmeredith@xxxxxxx>
To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2005 8:16 AM
Subject: [bookport] Re: compact flash card sizes
> Rich:
>
> I would stick with 2GB for now. The reason is that 2GB is as high as
> you can go with the FAT (FAT16) file system, and FAT16 is the
preferred
> file system for the Book Port. FAT32 can be used with limited
success,
> but I wouldn't go there for now.
>
> Rob Meredith
>
>>>> richcav@xxxxxxxxxxx 04/13/05 06:50PM >>>
> what is the largest compact flash card size available that can be
used
> on the book port?
>
>
Other related posts:
