[bookport] Re: bookport suggestion
- From: "Kevin Jones" <kevin@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 01:49:17 -0600
Different speech engines are one of the things that should be left out, as
other speech engines require more powerful processors and would also mean
less battery life.
-----Original Message-----
From: bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of David Allen
Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2005 11:18 PM
To: bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [bookport] Re: bookport suggestion
Hi David and list:
So if such a nit can be manufactured that easily and cheaply with all the
functionality you outlined without reducing the degree of functionality book
port owners already enjoy, what's stopping you?Remember, many want a choice
of speech engines as well.
Cheers,
Dave
Other related posts:
