[bookport] Re: bookport suggestion

  • From: Josh Kennedy <jkenn337@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2005 15:30:19 -0500

I can't wait to get one! Also, if the braille 'n speak has more memory and processor power, then why can't it play mp3s also?

Josh

----- Original Message ----- From: "Sarah Cranston" <cranston.sarah@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, November 14, 2005 2:07 PM
Subject: [bookport] Re: bookport suggestion



If you're like me, or a whole bunch of other people on this list, you'll never regret purchasing the BookPort. It has proved to be the single-most valuable reading tool I have used in the last two years. It completely changed the way I read, at least with speech.



-----Original Message-----
From: bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Josh Kennedy
Sent: Monday, November 14, 2005 12:05 PM
To: bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [bookport] Re: bookport suggestion


ok. I understand now. I still plan to get a bookport as soon as possible, so
I can read books and play mp3s and record and take text notes.


Josh

----- Original Message ----- From: "Sarah Cranston" <cranston.sarah@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, November 14, 2005 11:57 AM
Subject: [bookport] Re: bookport suggestion



Josh,

I don't know why no one, especially from APH, hasn't addressed this.
Perhaps there is a good reason not to, so I apologize if I'm stepping out
of bounds here.  I also apologize for expounding on this longwinded and
pointless thread, but I feel there is one point which has been neglected
and should be addressed.

The "1992/1993 Braille 'n Speak technology" of which you speak is
completely irrelevant to the BookPort. The two devices were designed
entirely differently, with different functionality in mind. I think the
main reason the BookPort isn't a Braille 'n Speak, or an equivalent
thereof, is because of it's very small amount of firmware. If I remember
correctly, the BookPort only has a few hundred K for storing and
manipulating the firmware. This is because it doesn't need a whole lot to
handle text files and MP3s. The BNS contains quite a bit more memory, and
possibly a faster processor. There simply isn't enough room to turn the
BP into a BNS. Besides, the BNS, while handy for reading, was originally
designed as a notetaker, and does its best work as a notetaker. The
BookPort, on the other hand, was designed to read books, hence the name,
and the notetaker was a nice little add-on which APH generously provided.
I don't know how they got it in there, and I'm very impresse
d that it works as well as it does. I'll feel the same about a
calculator, when and if it comes along.


In order to turn a Book Port into the equivalent of a BNS, you would need
a whole new board, with more storage space for firmware, and a faster
processor. We would all have to send our BookPorts back to APH for
upgrades--sounds like a certain PDA manufacturer, doesn't it?--and I won't
be doing that any time soon. For one thing, I can't imagine sending my BP
away and living without it for however long it would take to upgrade it,
and second, spending more money on top of what the unit already costs.
Most BP owners I know of found the current price just barely affordable,
and a price hike, like that which would become inevitable were the BP
turned into a BNS equivalent, would push it right out of a lot of
peoples' budgets.


So, what I'm trying to say, is that you are taking a perfectly delicious
orange, and asking it to be a banana, or maybe even a cucumber.  <Smile>
Both foods have there values and uses, they both have the right to exist,
and anything anyone can do to further perfect either should be
appreciated, but they can't be substituted for each other, unless someone
has some very interesting tastes.  <Smile>  Oranges make the best Orange
Juliuses, and cucumbers do great things for a green salad.  But can you
imagine a hybrid?  Yikes!

Just three and a half cents from a happy owner of a BP, and a former BNS
user.

Sarah



-----Original Message-----
From: bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Josh Kennedy
Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2005 8:44 PM
To: bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [bookport] Re: bookport suggestion


yep, another reason why we should implement some of that 1993 braille n speak technology in there.

Josh

----- Original Message ----- From: "Wstephan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <wstephan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2005 9:07 PM
Subject: [bookport] Re: bookport suggestion



Certainly yes, size is an issue, but over and above that, it's entirely
possible to use a Bookport while walking, or doing any number of other
things.  A Pac mate doesn't lend itself very well to being used under
many
conditions, especially where inclement weather is a factor.


Bill Stephan Kansas City, MO (816)803-2469 Email: Wstephan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx


-----Original Message-----
.From: "Josh Kennedy"<jkenn337@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
.Sent: 11/10/05 7:24:05 PM
.To: "bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx"<bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
.Subject: [bookport] Re: bookport suggestion
.
.but if you have a pacmate or pda then why have a bookport?
.Well a bookport is smaller, guess it's all personal preference.
.
.
.Josh
.
.----- Original Message ----- .From: "Wstephan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <wstephan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
.To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
.Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2005 7:23 PM
.Subject: [bookport] Re: bookport suggestion
.
.
.> Well, my suggestion is a bit different.
.>
.> I'd like for someone to develop transfer software that could run on a
Pac
.> Mate. Bill Stephan
.> Kansas City, MO
.> (816)803-2469
.> Email: Wstephan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
.>
.>
.> S -----Original Message-----
.> .From: "DanFlasar@xxxxxxx"<DanFlasar@xxxxxxx>
.> .Sent: 11/10/05 2:34:08 PM
.> .To: "bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx"<bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
.> .Subject: [bookport] Re: bookport suggestion
.> .
.> .I'll have to agree with Dave here. I love my Bookport - it's
versatility
.> .keeps showing up in unexpected ways. I was working out yesterday on
a
.> treadmill
.> .when the I finished the book I was reading ("Vancouver" - available
from
.> .Bookshare - a Mitchener-esque history of the city of Vancouver -
.> excellent!).
.> .Instead of having to change a tape (assuming I'd had the foresight
to
.> include
.> .a tape for another book or magazine, I just went to the index and
chose
.> from
.> .among 20 other books I'd downloaded from Bookshare. I chose "Me
Talk
.> Pretty
.> .One Day" by David Sedaris. It's like having a little library with
me
.> at all
.> .times.
.> . I have a Parrot Voicemate as a PDA which works fine for me. I'm
.> fine
.> .with the Bookport providing the functions it does. I see it as a
.> portable
.> .reading machine. I'd love to have better voice capabilities, and I
do
.> get a
.> .little annoyed at hearing St. Louis pronounced as Street Louis, but
I
.> get what it
.> .means. If anything, I'd like to see it take on some Kurzweil
.> .characteristics. For example, I'd like to have a dictionary
on-board,
.> which could be
.> .automatically cross-referenced to a book I'm reading.
.> . For example, if I heard a word that I'm not familiar with, I'd
like
.> to
.> .be able to key to the word, hit a key combo and get a definition for
it.
.> . Not asking for much, am I?
.> .Dan
.> .
.> .
.>
.>
.
.











Other related posts: