[bookport] Re: bookport suggestion

  • From: "Richard Ring" <ring.richard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2005 11:56:56 -0600

I'm Mr. Allen here.
I have never used a calculator in order to read, I suppose if I were
reading a book concerning mathematics it might make sense, but I would
never read such a book with the Bookport anyway.


-----Original Message-----
From: bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of tom hawkins
Sent: Monday, November 14, 2005 11:40 AM
To: bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [bookport] Re: bookport suggestion


Hey Dave, Give Over!  Tom Hawkins
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "David Allen" <wd8ldy@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2005 1:59 PM
Subject: [bookport] Re: bookport suggestion


> Hi Kevin and list:
>
> I think you are correct. Can you explain how a calculator is needed to

> read a book? I know an accoutant needs a financial calculator. A
carpenter 
> needs a scientific calculator. Heck I use the scientific calculator in
the 
> Braille lite quite a bit for conversions because I still think in
imperial 
> terms though the world around me is completely metric. But I'm trying
to 
> understand how a calculator would improve my ability to read books.
What 
> logic is missing?
>
> Cheers,
> Dave
>
>
>
>
> 



Other related posts: