[bookport] Re: bookport plus

  • From: "Mark Blier" <mblier@xxxxxxx>
  • To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2009 10:33:23 -0700

Hi, Pamela,

I had reservations about the Book Port when it first came out, because there 
was no notetaking function, but I thought I could probably use in in other ways.

When the notetaking function came, my jotting was revolutionized, and my 
reservations about the Book Port vanished.  For many things, gone were the 
slate, stylus, and brailler, as I could write, upload, download, etc.

When the notetaking function appears on this new device, I will get it, and it 
will be well worth the wait.

Will this new device take compact-flash cards, memory sticks, thumb drives, or 
what?

Thanks.

Mark

<-->




----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Pamela Rader" <prader@xxxxxxx>
To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2009 1:45 PM
Subject: [bookport] Re: bookport plus


Hi Mark:

The original Book Port was discontinued because parts ran out.  We had also 
reached the ceiling as far as making any changes to it.  Therefore, that Book 
Port was no more.  

For the past 2 years, we have been working on a replacement product.  In that 
time, we have had to change manufacturers, which also meant some changes in the 
design.  

The Book Port Plus will be that replacement product.  Since we are working with 
a manufacturer who already has a product, it is more feasible to modify an 
already existing product than it is to start from scratch. 
Because of the deadlines, when the product first comes out, it won't have 
everything onboard.  That's unfortunate, but that's the way it is.  I don't 
know how far you go back with Book Port, but if by chance you came on later, 
the Book Port did not have note taking capabilities when it first came out, 
either.  That was something that was added at a later time.  I'm sure that we 
intended to have everything onboard when the Book Port Plus comes out, but 
things happen in development and therefore, some things may take more time and 
development.

Pamela


-----Original Message-----
From: bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Mark Blier
Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2009 3:25 PM
To: bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [bookport] Re: bookport plus

Hi, Pamela,

I thought that the entire experience of the Book Port was to include both 
reading *and* writing functions in one very neat and small package, thus 
eliminating the need to carry yet another gizmo for notetaking.

What is wrong with enhancing the Book Port in its current form, rather than 
scrapping it for something else, without including an important function in the 
redesign?

Thanks.

Mark

<-->


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Pamela Rader" <prader@xxxxxxx>
To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2009 12:01 PM
Subject: [bookport] Re: bookport plus


Hi Mark:

The initial release will not have that capability, but I'm told that it is 
being worked on for a later time.  

Pamela


-----Original Message-----
From: bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Mark Blier
Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2009 12:14 PM
To: bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [bookport] Re: bookport plus

Hi, All,

Will there be a notetaking function?

Mark

<-->


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Pamela Rader" <prader@xxxxxxx>
To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2009 6:58 AM
Subject: [bookport] Re: bookport plus


Hi:

No.  It uses the same as the other Plex Talk use.  The only thing we're 
changing is the menus, which will be a human recorded sample.



-----Original Message-----
From: bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Brandon Misch
Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2009 8:44 AM
To: bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [bookport] Re: bookport plus

will the new unit use double talk or what synthesizer will be used in the 
upcoming product? 

On Dec 29, 2009, at 4:51 AM, Rinaldo wrote:

> 
> Hi
> I think it will be  a very good idea if they just include a qwerty keyboard
> socket so we can plug one if so needed and that include other braille tipe
> keyboards for the blind.
> Looking forward to a new product.
> Rinaldo.
> On 2009-12-28 bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx said:
>> Hi, All,
>> I am a little concerned about this new thing as well.  All I want
>> is a Bo ok Port with undistorted audio capability.  I love the
>> notetaking functio n, although, in my next life, I would wish for a
>> Book Port with a qwerty keyboard so I could type faster.
>> Nevertheless, the Book Port is my 21st- century slate and stylus.
>> Sincerely,
>> Mark Blier
>> Sierra Vista, Arizona
>> <-->
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> Sent: Monday, December 28, 2009 6:47 AM
>> I have a large Plex talk machine, the one that the RNIB send out to
>> it's talking book
>> subscribers, and the text to speach voice is just terrible.  I'm a
>> bit wo rried by this
>> news.
>> Shell.
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> Sent: Monday, December 28, 2009 10:04 AM
>>> Links:
>>> http://www.blindbargains.com/bargains.php?mH87
>>> http://www.goeshow.com/atia/orlando/2010/profile.
>> cfm?profile_name
s sion
>>> <http://www.goeshow.com/atia/orlando/2010/profile.
>> cfm?profile_name
 ssion&m
>>> aster_keyÂ2BC72D-D051-4792-AF82-7554FB49009A&page_key,A9DACB-0F
>> 0F-4803-9
>>> CCC-F5A253CEE164&xtemplate>
>>> &master_keyÂ2BC72D-D051-4792-AF82-7554FB49009A&page_key,A9DACB-
>> 0F0F-4803
>>> -9CCC-F5A253CEE164&xtemplate
>>> in this article:
>>> "American Printing House for the Blind (APH) has contracted with
>> Shinan o
>>> Kenshi Corp to combine the excellent hardware from the Plextalk
>> Pocket with
>>> a modified version of the firmware that brings added features,
>> performa nce,
>>> and convenience to the platform."
>>> It seems, as the BP1 was a kind of modified BC, the BP+ is a kind
>>> of  modified PTP1.
>> --
>> I am using the free version of SPAMfighter.
>> We are a community of 6 million users fighting spam.
>> SPAMfighter has removed 2071 of my spam emails to date.
>> Get the free SPAMfighter here: http://www.spamfighter.com/len
>> The Professional version does not have this message
> 
> 










Other related posts: