Which is not the same thing as your statement that batteries were damaged. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Kevin Jones" <kevin@xxxxxxxxxxx> To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2005 7:55 PM Subject: [bookport] Re: a source for rechargeable batteries and charger It says in the article that the 15-minute chargers only seem to charge the batteries 85% and even if left in over night they don't seem to fully charge the batteries. -----Original Message----- From: bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Chris Hill Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2005 6:15 PM To: bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [bookport] Re: a source for rechargeable batteries and charger Are you thinking heat damage? You could be right, but even if you only get 100 charges instead of 200, they are still a good deal, especially when you figure in convenience. On Thu, 22 Sep 2005 17:44:06 -0500, you wrote: >The problem with the 15 minute chargers is that they in part damage the >batteries while charging them >The Maha 204w charger seems to be the best all around nimh charger currently >You can get lots of cool information if you read >The great battery shootout >By >David Etchells >Here's the link >http://www.imaging-resource.com/ACCS/BATTS/BATTS.HTM > >