[bookport] Re: a source for rechargeable batteries and charger

  • From: "Walt Smith" <ka3agm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 20:04:33 -0400

Which is not the same thing as your statement that batteries were damaged.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Kevin Jones" <kevin@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2005 7:55 PM
Subject: [bookport] Re: a source for rechargeable batteries and charger


It says in the article that  the 15-minute chargers only seem to charge the
batteries 85% and even if left in over night they don't seem to fully charge
the batteries.

-----Original Message-----
From: bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Chris Hill
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2005 6:15 PM
To: bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [bookport] Re: a source for rechargeable batteries and charger

Are you thinking heat damage?  You could be right, but even if you
only get 100 charges instead of 200, they are still a good deal,
especially when you figure in convenience.


On Thu, 22 Sep 2005 17:44:06 -0500, you wrote:

>The problem with the 15 minute chargers is that they in part damage the
>batteries while charging them
>The Maha 204w charger seems to be the best all around nimh charger
currently
>You can get lots of cool information if you read
>The great battery shootout
>By
>David Etchells
>Here's the link
>http://www.imaging-resource.com/ACCS/BATTS/BATTS.HTM
>
>




Other related posts: