[bookport] Re: USB Power

  • From: "Mike Arrigo" <n0oxy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 23:55:19 -0500

Well, they certainly seem to know how to do the hardware and firmware for
this type of device. Actually, I think they also manufactured the road
runner, which I think was the first device of this kind.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "LARRY SKUTCHAN" <lskutchan@xxxxxxx>
To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2005 7:11 AM
Subject: [bookport] Re: USB Power


> We can pretty well do whatever we find is the best way to go.  We have
> no problems with Springer though.
>
>
> >>> n0oxy@xxxxxxxxxxx Monday, April 11, 2005 8:03:31 PM >>>
> The real question there then is, does springer design have the
> capability to
> produce the hardware end of things if new hardware is used, or would
> you
> guys have to find another company to handle that?
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "LARRY SKUTCHAN" <lskutchan@xxxxxxx>
> To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Monday, April 11, 2005 7:47 AM
> Subject: [bookport] Re: USB Power
>
>
> > We have known for quite some time that a hardware change is coming.
> For
> > one thing, we want to support more audio types like protected wma.
> We
> > would also like to upgrade the usb to be high-speed.  The question
> is
> > keeping those attributes that make the device so convenient.
> >
> >
> > >>> wd8ldy@xxxxxxxxxx Friday, April 08, 2005 9:01:55 PM >>>
> > Marlaina and list:
> >
> > You, grumpy? Say it has never been so! Seriously, I agree with you
> on
> > the
> > speakers. Ditto USB power as I thought that had been discussed to
> death
> >
> > before, and rejected because it would require hardware changes. But
> > hardware
> > revision or no, Larry seems to see it differently now. What has
> changed
> > your
> > mind, Larry?
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Dave
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>


Other related posts: