[bookport] Re: Synthesizers
- From: Sky Taylor <skyt@xxxxxxx>
- To: bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 07:22:47 -0700
me too. and apollo
----- Original Message -----
From: "Robert Carter" <r-carter@xxxxxxx>
To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2005 6:48 AM
Subject: [bookport] Re: Synthesizers
> Hi,
>
> I vote for DoubleTalk.
>
> Robert
>
> At 08:15 AM 4/13/2005, you wrote:
>>hi,
>>i like both dectalk and doubletalk. they are both good.
>>if you set the voice pitch just right with paul and dectalk, you can get
>>him sounding pretty scarry to read those scarry books.
>>Chris
>>--
>>Chris G <chrisg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>>
>>
>>On Wed, 13 Apr 2005 09:07:41 -0400
>>"LARRY SKUTCHAN" <lskutchan@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>LS> While we are talking about synthesizers, let me ask a question or two:
>>LS>
>>LS> What do you think of DEC-Talk?
>>LS>
>>LS> I will say that AT&T Natural Voices requires far too much in the way
>>of
>>LS> resources than we are able to put on a low power-consumption device.
>>LS>
>>LS> It looks like the top contenders are
>>LS>
>>LS>
>>LS> DoubleTalk
>>LS> Eloquence
>>LS> DEC-Talk
>>LS>
>>LS> What are your thoughts?
>>LS>
>>LS> Do you know of others?
>>LS>
>>LS>
>>
>>--
>>Chris G <chrisg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>
Other related posts:
