[bookport] Re: Suggestion for New Feature
- From: "Mike Arrigo" <n0oxy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 16:26:59 -0500
I have no problem with adding features like this as long as the main
priority is still reading, which was the book port's main objective. As
someone who works in tech support, some of the calls I get relate to
printing problems, and guess what printers have the most of them? THe multi
purpose devices, that are printers, scanners, fax machines all in one. Any
time you start trying to combine too many things in to one device, you
increase the risk for problems.
----- Original Message -----
From: "David Tanner" <david-tanner@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2006 9:31 PM
Subject: [bookport] Re: Suggestion for New Feature
> I know, and I even see a lot of folks in the BEP program in a lot of
states, including ours, that aren't getting rich at it, and are not tech
savy. But I am sure they could get a lot of good out of a simple to use
device. But I guess our friends would rather they continue to use a Perkins
Braille Writer since they aren't technically gifted.
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "John Melia" <uncle.jam@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2006 9:02 PM
> Subject: [bookport] Re: Suggestion for New Feature
>
>
> :I agree with you I work making 30 thousand dollars a year and I can't buy
> : such things as the backdates and other such stuff. in fact I can't
justify
> : buying anyway.
> : and why is it that blind folks have to be very techie in order to use
some
> : of the stuff out there. if many sight folks had to work as hard to get
a
> : thing to work they would not do it.
> : ----- Original Message -----
> : From: "David Tanner" <david-tanner@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> : To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> : Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2006 9:57 PM
> : Subject: [bookport] Re: Suggestion for New Feature
> :
> :
> : > That is what I thought too, but I have noticed that that only works as
> : > long is it doesn't cross with the wants of certain people on the list
who
> : > love to be critical of any idea that isn't theirs.
> : >
> : > My concern at this point is that I see the Book Port as a device which
> : > could fill the need for a good book reader, and also the need for an
easy
> : > to use organizer. It is fine for the techie bunch to say "well I have
a
> : > PDA and don't need another one". But, I can think of a lot of blind
folks
> : > that I work with as an assistive technology specialist with a state
agency
> : > for the blind who can't use those wonderful PDAs and never will have
the
> : > ability level to use a device as sophisticated as PacMate,
BrailleNote,
> : > Maestro, etc. For them the best solution has been the Parot
VoiceMate,
> : > but that is no longer made. For a long time it was the unit of
choice,
> : > but over the past two years the workmanship went to pot on those units
and
> : > we along with other agencies had to quit recommending them.
> : >
> : > My point is there are a lot of non-techie people who could get a lot
of
> : > use from a hand-held unit with a simple notetaker, alarms, basic
> : > calculator, and a simple way to save names, addresses and phone
numbers.
> : > These people may or may not be able to use the book reading features,
but
> : > those who can use the book reading features could also make use of the
> : > other features.
> : >
> : > I guess I am a little tired of the technically gifted, who have the
money
> : > to buy, and ability to use a PDA coming out with blatent attitudes
that
> : > tell me that they have no idea what so many blind people cannot do or
> : > afford to do.
> : >
> : > Finally, it is those independant living people who need this type of
> : > technology who state counselors may spend $300 or $400 for, but you
will
> : > never convince them to purchase a $1200 or higher PDA for one of these
> : > folks.
> : >
> : >
> : > ----- Original Message -----
> : > From: "Bruce Toews" <DogRiver@xxxxxxxx>
> : > To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> : > Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2006 10:43 AM
> : > Subject: [bookport] Re: Suggestion for New Feature
> : >
> : >
> : > : But let's give APH some credit here. They know what's workable and
> : > what's
> : > : not. That's why they've told us to let the suggestions flow. They'll
> : > sort
> : > : out the possible from the impossible, the practical from the
> : > impractical.
> : > :
> : > : Bruce
> : > :
> : > : --
> : > : Bruce Toews
> : > : E-mail and MSN/Windows Messenger: DogRiver@xxxxxxxx
> : > : Radio Show and Podcast: http://www.totw.net
> : > : Web Site (including info on my weekly commentaries):
http://www.ogts.net
> : > : Info on the Best TV Show of All Time: http://www.cornergas.com
> : > :
> : > : On Tue, 11 Apr 2006, Walt Smith wrote:
> : > :
> : > : > The real problem, though, is that if an address book were added,
the
> : > _next_
> : > : > "little enhancement" that'd be requested would be the ability to
do
> : > e-mail
> : > : > on the device. These things are always incremental--I've been
> : > following the
> : > : > blindness technology field for fifty years and that's been the
> : > universal
> : > : > experience. It's not necessarily that an address book, per se, is
bad
> : > : > (although I oppose it), but what the _next_ demand would be based
on
> : > the
> : > : > fact that it'd been included. The same with a radio--you put one
into
> : > the BP
> : > : > and the next thing that would be demanded would be the ability to
> : > record
> : > : > from the radio to the BP.
> : > : >
> : > : > ----- Original Message -----
> : > : > From: "David Tanner" <david-tanner@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> : > : > To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> : > : > Sent: Monday, April 10, 2006 5:07 PM
> : > : > Subject: [bookport] Re: Suggestion for New Feature
> : > : >
> : > : >
> : > : > Following your argument that it is a book reader and music player
then
> : > Book
> : > : > Port shouldn't have an alarm feature or a notetaker.
> : > : >
> : > : > why are some people so insistant that the Book Port should not be
> : > flexable?
> : > : > You would think I were talking about some big expensive addition.
I
> : > doubt
> : > : > that it would take much more programming code than the alarms
feature,
> : > and
> : > : > probably would not be as difficult to write and make it work right
as
> : > the
> : > : > alarms feature.
> : > : >
> : > : > Your excuse that it will drive the cost up seems to have become
the
> : > standard
> : > : > excuse for those who want no change.
> : > : >
> : > : > Frankly, a lot of college students are using Book Port, and for
them
> : > the
> : > : > devices that will perform the most functions without having to
carry
> : > around
> : > : > tons of things are what are going to be successful. I also have
my
> : > doubts
> : > : > that one of the primary objectives of APH was to make an
accessible
> : > MP3
> : > : > music player. I am sure the idea was to play books that might be
in
> : > MP3
> : > : > format, but so long as there is sufficient memory why not include
> : > another
> : > : > feature that I think most users would find useful.
> : > : >
> : > : >
> : > : > ----- Original Message -----
> : > : > From: "Mark Lee" <lee.mark@xxxxxxxxx>
> : > : > To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> : > : > Sent: Monday, April 10, 2006 3:13 AM
> : > : > Subject: [bookport] Re: Suggestion for New Feature
> : > : >
> : > : >
> : > : > : I'm not fighting it, and it would be a nice feature to have, but
> : > let's
> : > : > : remember what the bookport's primary function is, namely, to
read
> : > books
> : > : > and
> : > : > : listen to music. Putting an address book templet in a Braille
'n
> : > Speak
> : > : > : makes since, since it was a PDA. If I need to take down a quick
> : > name,
> : > : > : address, phone number, etc. with my bookport, I usually record a
> : > memo and
> : > : > : transfer it to something else when I get home. I guess what my
> : > point is
> : > : > how
> : > : > : much will this feature be actually used? Before long, the
bookport
> : > will
> : > : > : become more a personal data assistant than a book reader. The
more
> : > : > features
> : > : > : are added, the higher the price will be. I don't want the
bookport
> : > to one
> : > : > : day cost as much as a Braille note. It would be very nice to
have
> : > an
> : > : > : all-in-one device that fit in a pocket that you can use to do
> : > everything
> : > : > : from reading books to taking notes to making phone calls, etc.
> : > : > : Unfortunately however, more features mean higher prices. I
> : > understand
> : > : > that
> : > : > : this is the 21st century, and technology is getting smaller,
faster
> : > and
> : > : > more
> : > : > : flexible. However, with adaptive technology as high in price as
it
> : > is, it
> : > : > : doesn't become cheaper.
> : > : > :
> : > : > : Mark
> : > : > : ASK, "WHAT GOALS WOULD YOU SET FOR YOURSELF IF YOU COULD NOT
FAIL?"
> : > Don't
> : > : > : ask if it's possible or impossible. Don't worry about failing.
Focus
> : > on
> : > : > what
> : > : > : you want, and let that be your guideline.
> : > : > : ----- Original Message -----
> : > : > : From: "David Tanner" <david-tanner@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> : > : > : To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> : > : > : Sent: Saturday, April 08, 2006 10:06 PM
> : > : > : Subject: [bookport] Re: Suggestion for New Feature
> : > : > :
> : > : > :
> : > : > : > Nothing, but I guess I would ask you what is wrong with a
small
> : > : > : > address/phonebook application. I can't think that it would
need
> : > to take
> : > : > : > much more code than the alarms app, and could make management
of
> : > names,
> : > : > : > addresses and phone numbers easier.
> : > : > : >
> : > : > : > I heard the same question as yours when an address/phonebook
was
> : > put
> : > : > into
> : > : > : > Braille 'N Speak.
> : > : > : >
> : > : > : > My other most immediate response was to ask what's wrong with
> : > coming
> : > : > into
> : > : > : > the 21st century? But, some people will fight making things
> : > easier at
> : > : > all
> : > : > : > costs.
> : > : > : >
> : > : > : >
> : > : > : >
> : > : > : > ----- Original Message -----
> : > : > : > From: "Mark Lee" <lee.mark@xxxxxxxxx>
> : > : > : > To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> : > : > : > Sent: Saturday, April 08, 2006 12:51 PM
> : > : > : > Subject: [bookport] Re: Suggestion for New Feature
> : > : > : >
> : > : > : >
> : > : > : > : What's wrong with putting names, phone numbers, etc. into a
> : > notes file
> : > : > : > and
> : > : > : > : searching the file with the search feature?
> : > : > : > :
> : > : > : > : Mark
> : > : > : > : ----- Original Message -----
> : > : > : > : From: "David Tanner" <david-tanner@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> : > : > : > : To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> : > : > : > : Sent: Saturday, April 08, 2006 1:21 AM
> : > : > : > : Subject: [bookport] Suggestion for New Feature
> : > : > : > :
> : > : > : > :
> : > : > : > : >I would like to see a simple address-phonebook on the Book
> : > Port. Let
> : > : > : > me be
> : > : > : > : >a bit more spacific about what I would want it to do so
that
> : > you
> : > : > : > realize
> : > : > : > : >that I am taking into consideration memory limitations on
the
> : > current
> : > : > : > Book
> : > : > : > : >Port.
> : > : > : > : >
> : > : > : > : > I would like this simple address/phonebook to be able to
enter
> : > first
> : > : > : > and
> : > : > : > : > last name, address, home - work - mobile phone numbers and
a
> : > 200
> : > : > word
> : > : > : > memo
> : > : > : > : > memo field. The database could be searched by first
and/or
> : > last
> : > : > name.
> : > : > : > : >
> : > : > : > : > The idea would be to keep it simple, keep it small, and if
it
> : > makes
> : > : > a
> : > : > : > : > difference I could see a limit of no more than 200
entries.
> : > : > : > : >
> : > : > : > : > Skype user name: dtat100
> : > : > : > : >
> : > : > : > :
> : > : > : > :
> : > : > : > :
> : > : > : > :
> : > : > : > : --
> : > : > : > : No virus found in this incoming message.
> : > : > : > : Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> : > : > : > : Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.4.0/305 - Release
Date:
> : > : > 4/8/2006
> : > : > : > :
> : > : > : > :
> : > : > : >
> : > : > :
> : > : > :
> : > : > :
> : > : > :
> : > : > : --
> : > : > : No virus found in this incoming message.
> : > : > : Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> : > : > : Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.4.0/306 - Release Date:
> : > 4/9/2006
> : > : > :
> : > : > :
> : > : >
> : > : >
> : > : >
> : > :
> : > :
> : > :
> : > : --
> : > : No virus found in this incoming message.
> : > : Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> : > : Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.4.1/307 - Release Date:
4/10/2006
> : > :
> : > :
> : >
> : >
> :
> :
> :
> :
> :
> : --
> : No virus found in this incoming message.
> : Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> : Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.4.1/307 - Release Date: 4/10/2006
> :
> :
Other related posts:
