[bookport] Re: Sound Quality and Memos
- From: "Sarah Cranston" <cranston.sarah@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 13:24:11 -0500
Thanks, Jeremiah, that's good to know.
I've never been one of the digital recorder crowd, I know people who =
have collected them like other people collect stamps, so I didn't really =
get into recording memos with the BP.
-----Original Message-----
From: bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Jeremiah Z. Rogers
Sent: Monday, October 25, 2004 1:12 PM
To: bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [bookport] Re: Sound Quality and Memos
Hi Sarah et al. Like Sarah, I don't use the memos feature, but not =
because
of sound quality. I've heard a number of folks complain about the poor
quality of the recordings, but if you'll listen to one of those book =
port
recordings on the PC, they aren't that bad. The poor quality which you
blame on Book Port's recording of memos is actually its playing of =
memos.
The recorded memos sound much, much better, along the lines of a tape
recorder's on-board microphone, when played from the PC. I think this =
has
to do with APH playing wave files via the doubletalk chip, and =
doubletalk
always played wave files this poorly.
Jeremiah
Other related posts:
