I get most of my books and reading material from Bookshare. Will the TextAloud program process the DAISY formatted books? I can't believe that it will process BRF formatted books. I rely on the Bookport for both transformations. -- Pete -------- original note ----- > From: "Russ & Valerie" <valruss@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: [bookport] Re: Sending Text Files as Audio > Date: Sun, 8 Oct 2006 09:45:34 -0400 > > Yu can as well get a copy of the program 'text aloud', which will convert > your txt file into wav or mp3. Anumber of voices are also available for > purchase. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Missy Hoppe > To: bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Sent: Sunday, 08 October, 2006 09 20 > Subject: [bookport] Re: Sending Text Files as Audio > > Hi, Peter! I couldn't agree with you more on this; the audio file should > be able to be created without the bookport being connected. That way, the > batteries are only being drained during the actual transfer. Might this be > something that can be changed in the next release of the bookport transfer > software? > Missy > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- > > > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.1.407 / Virus Database: 268.13.1/466 - Release Date: 10/7/2006 > > > ------------------------------ > > From: "Kitty Litter" <n8kl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: [bookport] Re: Sending Text Files as Audio > Date: Sun, 8 Oct 2006 10:04:39 -0400 > > If you want to send text files as audio then go out and get yourself a > copy > of text aloud. There's really no reason the transfer software couldn't > have > ben written to process the files on your hard drive and then connecting > the > BP only when the processing is done. The excuse for not doing this was > that > some content is encrypted such as audible and RFB&D books. I don't really > believe this since the serial number of the bookport isn't secret and as > long as the transfer program knew the serial number the files could be > incrypted without the bookport being connected. I think the real reason is > that it would be too expensive to modify and debug the software especially > when you consider that as good as the bookport is, it is obsolete > technology > and who knows how much modifications will be needed for the new software, > if > there really is going to be a new bookport. Besides, this might make the > transfer program more complicated which means more tech support. The > bookport will never be all things to all people, I just accept it for what > it is and go on with my life the best I can. HTH