[bookport] Re: Section marker problem.
- From: "ROB MEREDITH" <rmeredith@xxxxxxx>
- To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 09:29:06 -0400
Its probably really the A+D and C+F change that effects you.
>>> jacques.bosch@xxxxxxx 05/12/06 08:53AM >>>
OK, that would be the reason.
So every section marker must be at least 5 chars long?
Thank you much for the help.
Will be great to have that functionality back.
Any progress or plans on the sub-section markers?
Jacques
----- Original Message -----
From: "PAMELA RADER" <PRADER@xxxxxxx>
To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, May 12, 2006 2:10 PM
Subject: [bookport] Re: Section marker problem.
> Jacques:
>
> It could be one of two things: Make sure you have 5 characters in
your
> string order for the program to recognize it; also, the key
combination
> has changed--it is now c plus f to move forward and a plus d to move
> back. The reason it still works for the manual is that the old
commands
> are for Daisy. Since the manual is in that format it works there.
>
>
>
> Pamela Rader, TECHNICAL SUPPORT
> American Printing House For The Blind
> 1839 Frankfort Ave.
> Louisville, KY 40206
>
> PHONE: 1-800-223-1839, Ext. 307
>
>
>>>> jacques.bosch@xxxxxxx 05/11/06 04:12PM >>>
> Good day all.
>
> Did I miss something about section markers in that latest release,
or
> is
> this actually a problem?
> Since loading version 2.02 my section markers don't seem to work.
> It is still the same files that used to work with section markers
> before.
> So I did a test with a new file and put some markers in (I tried
with
> +++
> and _@_), and I did put those at the top of the list.
> But no luck. I just get the error tone.
> None of my files work with section markers, accept the Bookport user
> manual,
> I can still navigate from section to section on it.
>
> This is very strange to me.
> Any ideas?
>
> Jacques.
>
>
>
Other related posts:
