[bookport] Re: Realistic Wish List

  • From: Bruce Toews <dogriver@xxxxxxxx>
  • To: bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2005 15:46:21 -0500 (CDT)

Then why not have a classic model and a 21st century model? The classic model could essentially be what we have now.


Bruce Toews
E-mail and MSN/Windows Messenger: dogriver@xxxxxxxx
Web Site (including info on my weekly commentaries): http://www.ogts.net
Info on the Best TV Show of All Time: http://www.cornergas.com

On Wed, 17 Aug 2005, Richard Ring wrote:

I just have a feeling that the device might become too complex for some
people to use.
One of the great things about the Bookport is its ease of use.
But I'm only one individual, and I don't use the note taking feature at
all, for example.  I know from this list that some people love it.
I don't use the recording feature either, because I don't particularly
like the sound quality.
Oh, there's an idea, let's improve the recording sound quality.

-----Original Message-----
From: bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Bruce Toews
Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2005 2:30 PM
To: bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [bookport] Re: Realistic Wish List

But let's not adopt that "I don't need it, so it's not necessary" attitude that's been scuttling DVS attempts in the States.


Other related posts: