[bookport] Re: Progress and the Book Port
- From: "Kotler/McCarthy Marv/Josie" <mjslipp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 17:05:01 -0800
I have had no trouble with the belt clip the way that it is. If I push down
on the book port a little bit, the belt clip is pretty tight.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tyler Wood" <tcwood12@xxxxxxx>
To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2005 4:14 PM
Subject: [bookport] Re: Progress and the Book Port
> I'd have to agree on that one, as you payed 400 dollars for it, it should
be
> secure-- and I don't think I'd mind waiting a few minutes with the hastle,
> iether. But each individual is entitled to an oppinion.
>
> Tyler
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Walt Smith" <walt@xxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2005 1:49 PM
> Subject: [bookport] Re: Progress and the Book Port
>
>
> > To each their own. I'll take the security of a $400 plus piece of
> > equipment
> > any day over a minor inconvenience.
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Mike Freeman" <k7uij@xxxxxxxxx>
> > To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2005 12:40 PM
> > Subject: [bookport] Re: Progress and the Book Port
> >
> >
> > That's more of a pain than the security is worth.
> >
> > Mike
> >
> > On Wed, 14 Dec 2005, Walt Smith wrote:
> >
> >> Actually, I would prefer a completely closed clip such as you find on
> >> some
> >> GPS receiver cases (including the one from Executive Products for the
> >> Globalsat BT338 receiver). While such a clip requires that you actually
> >> open
> >> your belt and slip it through the clip, there's absolutely no way the
> >> device
> >> will come off the belt with this style of clip.
> >>
> >> ----- Original Message -----
> >> From: "David Bennett" <david382@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2005 2:27 AM
> >> Subject: [bookport] Re: Progress and the Book Port
> >>
> >>
> >> Gosh, me too.
> >>
> >> ----- Original Message -----
> >> From: "Mike Freeman" <k7uij@xxxxxxxxx>
> >> To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2005 7:46 PM
> >> Subject: [bookport] Re: Progress and the Book Port
> >>
> >>
> >>> I wish that there was no belt clip but that the Book Port would slip
> >>> into
> >>> a
> >>> case such as that from Executive Products (I've ordered one) but with
> >>> the
> >>> clip on the case the unit slips into, not the unit itself. Moreover, I
> >>> wish
> >>> the clip were of the clothes-pin type as is used on some cell phone
> >>> cases
> >>> and on the case for the amateur radio THF6A handheld transceiver.
> >>>
> >>> Mike
> >>>
> >>> ----- Original Message -----
> >>> From: "Angie Matney" <armatney@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>> To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>> Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2005 3:59 PM
> >>> Subject: [bookport] Re: Progress and the Book Port
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> This sounds very similar to my experience. I like the case from
> >>>> Executive
> >>>> Products because it can reduce the likelihood
> >>>> of falls, and if there is a fall, you probably won't lose your
> >>>> batteries.
> >>>> (I wish the belt clip on the EP case fased the other
> >>>> way or swiveled, but that is a minor problem.) I have had several
> >>>> opportunities to appreciate the durability of the Book
> >>>> Port. <grin> Knock on wood, but it seems to be "Angie-proof," and
> >>>> believe
> >>>> me, that's a rare thing!
> >>>>
> >>>> On Tue, 13 Dec 2005 08:59:09 -0500, Walt Smith wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> My BP has had three relatively serious falls and the worst thing
> >>>>> that's
> >>>>> happened is that the batteries fell out and I lost my settings. I
> >>>>> shudder
> >>>>> to
> >>>>> even think what would have happened to a built-in micro drive.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > No virus found in this incoming message.
> > Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> > Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.13.13/200 - Release Date:
> > 14/12/2005
> >
> >
>
>
Other related posts:
