I agree, a popup would take care of experienced users as well as newbies. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Barrett, Don" <Don.Barrett@xxxxxx> To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Friday, April 16, 2004 9:40 AM Subject: [bookport] Re: Possible bug > Please change it so that an error during sending doesn't flush the cue. You > could have a dialog box that says, "Card is full; delete rest of cued files, > y/n?" or something similar. > Thanks. > > Don > > > -----Original Message----- > From: ROB MEREDITH [mailto:rmeredith@xxxxxxx] > Sent: Friday, April 16, 2004 9:36 AM > To: bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [bookport] Re: Possible bug > > > Angie: > > It appears that your machine is not contrary. Unique perhaps, but not = > contrary! > > Seriously, we delete all queued files when there is an error during the = > send process. The primary reason is because it is possible to queue files = > which will never go to the device. Perhaps for example, a user has a 128 = > MB card, and they queue a 140 MB MP3 file. If we didn't delete all queued = > files, they would be asked every time they connect, only to get an error. = > Of course, they could use Brows or Delete if they wanted to in this = > situation. > > I realize that this is a somewhat liberal solution to a problem that some = > may never have, but it avoids stressing beginners or casual users if it = > should occur. So, I ask of all of you, should an error during sending = > queued files clear the queue? I can easily change this for the next = > release if most people want it changed. > > Rob Meredith > > >>> matneyar@xxxxxxx 04/16/04 03:04AM >>> > OK, Has this happened to anyone else? > > I had cued several files from web pages. Unfortunately, I forgot my card = > was full. When I tried to send the files, I was reminded of this fact. I = > deleted a bunch of stuff, expecting to be able to send the files then. = > But,=20 > Unfortunately, the cue was then empty! The files were gone! > > This wouldn't be such a big deal if they hadn't been web pages. > > Is this a pattern, or is this unique to my own little contrary machine? = > <grin> > > Angie > > > > > > > > > >