[bookport] Re: Please don't take down the list

  • From: "Catalina and Tristan" <catroi@xxxxxxx>
  • To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 16:41:59 -0500

Hi listers:
Shelly
you said:
Mere Threats.  Don't worry.
You know folks, I've been on a number of lists and I've never seen such a mean spirited group of people. I wouldn't blame Pam if she had the list dumped. This is a very helpful list but we can do without all of the arrogance and nastiness. Some of you are probably thinking, just use the delete key, and I do. But why go on and on and on and on and on about the same thing. Just take the conversation off list. 

Pam, I give you a lot of credit for dealing with this.

Catalina and Tristan
For attractive lips, speak words of kindness. For lovely eyes, seek out the good in people. For a slim figure, share your food with the hungry. For beautiful hair, let a child run his/her fingers through it once a day. For poise, walk with the knowledge that you never walk alone. 
Audrey Hepburn
Email and MSN: catroi@xxxxxxx
Skype: pigwidgeon
----- Original Message ----- From: "Blomstrom, Shelly J" <Shelly.J.Blomstrom@xxxxxxxxxx> 
To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2007 4:23 PM
Subject: [bookport] Re: Please don't take down the list



Mere Threats.  Don't worry.

-----Original Message-----
From: bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of MELODY SMITH
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2007 4:09 PM
To: bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [bookport] Re: Please don't take down the list

I also don't know if taking the Book Port down is the answer.
I thing blocking those who are not willing to abide by the rules. is an
excellent idea.

Melody.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Kramlinger, Keith G., M.D." <kramk@xxxxxxxx>
To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2007 1:26 PM
Subject: [bookport] Re: Please don't take down the list



Please don't take down this list. It is useful for many.

I would prefer you consider blocking access to repeat offenders.

-----Original Message-----
From: bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of PAMELA RADER
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2007 3:16 PM
To: bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [bookport] Re: To the moderator

Hi:

Although it's better not to clog a list with thank you's and one

liners,

because of the list trafic it creates, I would much rather see a kind
and appreciative thank you than some of the badgering I'm seeing and

the

unkindness this list has generated.

To everyone else:  PLEASE STOP!  As moderator, I'm getting sick of

this

stuff and am seriously thinking of suggesting that this list be taken
down, if we can't do any better.

Thank you!



Pamela Rader, TECHNICAL SUPPORT
American Printing House For The Blind
1839 Frankfort Ave.
Louisville, KY  40206

PHONE:  1-800-223-1839, Ext. 307


>>> jayjohnson62@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 10/02/07 04:08PM >>>
If I have violated a rule by sending an appreciation note to the list,

I


sincerely apologize.  Will you please address the situation?  I will

say


that if it's permissible to beat a dead horse to death on some ongoing
subject, why is it not permissible to send a thank-you note to the

list

for
those to helped with a problem?  Regards, Jesse
----- Original Message ----- From: "Donald L. Roberts" <ka7ojt@xxxxxxxxxxx> 
To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2007 11:40 AM
Subject: [bookport] Re: Thanks for your assistance


>O for heaven's sake! I certainly respect good manners, but why
> constantly clutter this list even more with thank you messages.
>
> Taking it one step further, why did I send this to the list when
> I could have sent it privately?
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- > From: "jaybee" <jayjohnson62@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
> To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Monday, October 01, 2007 1:37 AM
> Subject: [bookport] Re: Thanks for your assistance
>
>
> Thanks; it really does.  Jesse
> ----- Original Message ----- > From: albert griffith 
>  To: bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>  Sent: Monday, October 01, 2007 12:52 AM
>  Subject: [bookport] Re: Thanks for your assistance
>
>
>  The latest state of the product release is yet to be determined
> but we're told we shouldn't look for it until at least early next
> year.  The next area of prime concern was whether the present
> units would receive an update enabling them to play NLS. material
> and the answer is no.  I hope that helps.
>
>
>
>


------------------------------------------------------------------------

----
>    From: bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of jaybee
>    Sent: Sunday, September 30, 2007 10:44 PM
>    To: bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>    Subject: [bookport] Thanks for your assistance
>
>
>    I want to express my appreciation to everyone who answered my
> request for help.  You were very prompt in providing the help I
> needed.  By the way, I know that it has been mentioned several
> times, but I would like to know if there has been any more
> information relating to the latest release of the new bookport?
> Thanks, Jesse
>
>

Other related posts:

  1. Home
  2. bookport
  3. Archive
  4. 10-2007