[bookport] Re: Labeling Chargers

  • From: "Richard Ring" <richard.ring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 16:36:11 -0600

SD cards are quite distinguishable.  I can tell you that they will be a
snap for most people to use.  They are small, and the only thing I ever
worry about is losing one.  

-----Original Message-----
From: bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Bruce Toews
Sent: Friday, January 19, 2007 12:51 PM
To: bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [bookport] Re: Labeling Chargers

I'm not trying to start an argument here, I honestly don't know, having
never seen an SD card. But the old MMC cards, which were also very
small, had one clipped corner, making orientation a breeze. Do SD cards
have the same feature?
On Fri, 19 Jan 2007 13:46:13 -0500, "Walt Smith" <walt@xxxxxxxxxx> said:
> SD cards are shaped differently than CF cards and they do not have an
> easily 
> recognizable (by touch) distinction between their front and rear
> They 
> are simply harder for a blind person to use and that's a fact, as is
> fact that CF cards are not going away at any time in the lifetime of
> Book Port II. In fact, CF cards will still be around when a majority
> us 
> here on the list aren't. Using CF cards will not make the new BP any
> larger, 
> I don't believe, but since none of us has seen one, nobody's qualified
> state whether it would or not.
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Kevin Jones" <kevin@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 9:26 PM
> Subject: [bookport] Re: Labeling Chargers
> how can sd cards be so hard to put in, plus i think flash cards will
> discontinued before sd cards plus flash cards are huge thy ewould
> the new bookport to be much larger. if you think those are hard to put
> in try sim cards or micro sd cards.

Other related posts: