[bookport] Re: Hardware upgrade!

  • From: "Michael Bowman-Jones" <mikebowmanjones@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 19:37:50 -0700

Greetings, List.

The comment re always being bugs etc. is true to a point--it just seems there are tenfold the usual number on a first-generation product and I refuse to spend four digits worth of my hard-earned coin on such a gizmo--I can wait.

To conclude this as we are off topic: I truly hope and pray it works out for you should you take such a course and I would truly love nothing better than to be wrong. By the way, my position also applies to mainstream computer hardware and software, of which I have some experience in implementing and working with from first generation on and there were times it was a nightmare. Again, good luck.

Michael and his old 286 computer


----- Original Message ----- From: "David Allen" <wd8ldy@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, October 23, 2006 2:44 PM
Subject: [bookport] Re: Hardware upgrade!



Hi Michael and list:

Doesn't matter how many generations it is. There will always be bugs, needs for fixes, etc. Nothing particularly unusual about that. Recently, I was thinking about how we used to talk about what we did or didn't like about a new version of something when it came out. Well, it finally occurred to me that it was really a pointless discussion. I mean, when I new version of something comes out that allows us to do something we want to do, we have to take it, bugs and all, and use it the way it is, regardless of what we do or don't like.

Cheers,
Dave
----- Original Message ----- From: "Michael Bowman-Jones" <mikebowmanjones@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2006 9:12 AM
Subject: [bookport] Re: Hardware upgrade!



Greetings, List.

The other thing is that this is first-generation stuff and Lord alone knows how many bugs, fixes, upgrades, etc. you would have to deal with in the future.

Michael

----- Original Message ----- From: "Sandy Licht" <slicht@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, October 23, 2006 9:32 AM
Subject: [bookport] Re: Hardware upgrade!



When I read that this device was going to use USB1.1, I admit I was no longer impressed. That is old technology. To my way of thinking, the only thing it has going for it is, it claims to be smaller than a laptop. Oh, well... To each his own...

At 05:16 PM 10/21/2006, Kevin Jones wrote:
check out www.levelstar.com
though the pda isn't out yet, you should have the abilities of a bookport a plextalk and much more


Nancy Stevens wrote:
Hi Hope,
That is a cool saying at the end of your message.
Nancy
-----Original Message-----
From: bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Hope Hein
Sent: Saturday, October 21, 2006 9:35 AM
To: bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [bookport] Re: Hardware upgrade!
Hi Walt!
I purchased a Plextor from recordings for the Blind a year ago.
Unfortunately it is on the blink because it fell off of a desk. The Bookport
has an advantage because it is smaller and just uses CF cards. For some
reason I was told by Recordings for the Blind that I was not allowed to
transfer the material from the CD's to the CF card on the Plextor even
though it was being done on the Bookport. They would not be able to be read
because of the protection. That is one of the main reasons I bought the
Bookport besides the Bookport is more durable. The Plextor had some
advantages such as the ones mentioned in my message. Is there any way that
AFB could work with a company to combine say the features of the Bookport
and the Plextor?
Just throwing out thoughts.
Thank you for your patients.
Pondering, imagination and collaboration lead to new or improved inventions.
Hope
-----Original Message-----
.From: "Walt Smith"<walt@xxxxxxxxxx>
.Sent: 10/20/06 9:30:11 AM
.To: "bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx"<bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
.Subject: [bookport] Re: Hardware upgrade!
.
.Hope -
.
.While there's been no official statement from APH concerning their future
.plans, I think it's safe to say that the general consensus among those of
us .who've been around here for a while that eventually, there will be a new
.Book Port. There have been so many requests for improvements of the exact
.kind you mention (improved audio quality, the ability to speed up MP3 and
.Audible materials) that can't currently be accommodated in the existing
.hardware that it seems a fair guess that a new and improved BP is probably
.under consideration.
.
.Just to give you an idea of what has to be accommodated, though, bear in
.mind that right now, APH is dependent on Springer Design for the hardware
.and unless Springer decides to upgrade their own BookCourier, on which the
.BP is heavily based, it very well might not be economically feasible for
APH .to go it alone in the development and introduction of a new model.
Then, the .two parties would have to reach some kind of general agreement on
what new .functions and features they want so that a single hardware unit
could be .developed with APH then assuming responsibility for their own
firmware .development as is the case today. This can't be an easy process at
best.
.
.----- Original Message -----
.From: "Hope Hein" <hmhein@xxxxxxxxxxx>
.To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
.Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2006 3:11 PM
.Subject: [bookport] Hardware upgrade!
.
.
.Will there be an upgrade coming out for the Bookport? I listened to my
.children's IPODS and they have a wonderful sound for such small devices. I
.am wondering if you are considering to allow for improved sound as well as
.to allow the Bookport user to speed up or sloe audio speech.
.
.I thought I read something about an update next year but was not sure if I
.heard right and what that would entail.
.
.Thank you for doing such a great job.
.Hope
.
.


--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.408 / Virus Database: 268.13.9/490 - Release Date: 10/20/2006




__________ NOD32 1.1786 (20061002) Information __________

This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
http://www.eset.com







__________ NOD32 1.1786 (20061002) Information __________

This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
http://www.eset.com




Other related posts: