[bookport] Re: Cassette free.
- From: "Walt Smith" <walt@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 16:47:18 -0500
Well, different strokes and all that. Personally, I'd take working with open
reel tape any day of the week over working with cassettes. I still have
hundreds of open reel tapes with books on them.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Rose Combs" <rosecombs@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, November 06, 2005 8:53 PM
Subject: [bookport] Re: Cassette free.
It may be superior from a technical standpoint, but from the end-user,
reel-to-reel is a headache I am glad I do not have to endure any longer.
Rose Combs
rosecombs@xxxxxxxxx
-----Original Message-----
From: bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Otto Zamora
Sent: Sunday, November 06, 2005 1:35 PM
To: bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [bookport] Re: Cassette free.
Hello,
Reel to reel is of a much better quality then cassettes was.
It was the preferred thing for audio files, and even now, with the computer
technology out there, there is a engineer and recording friend of mine who
still uses an 8 track machine.
Otto
-----Original Message-----
From: bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Ed Meskys
Sent: Saturday, November 05, 2005 7:30 PM
To: bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [bookport] Re: Cassette free.
When I first used rfb in 72 it was open reel but by 76 it was half open reel
and half cassette. I spoke with a born-blind friend and she had started with
sound=sheets...Dictaphone disks? Best, Edmund R. Meskys
edmeskys@xxxxxxxxxxxx Niekas Publications National Federation of the Blind
of NH 322 Whittier Hwy Moultonboro, NH 03254
Other related posts:
