[bookport] Re: Batteries
- From: "David Tanner" <david-tanner@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 01:05:20 -0600
I would agree. Sure, there is a cost to having to purchase replacement
batteries, but rechargeable built-in batteries do not seem like a very good
solution for a unit like the BookPort. I would only support rechargeable
built-in batteries if the power requirements on the next generation BookPort
demands enough power to make use of user replaceable batteries an unrealistic
choice.
----- Original Message -----
From: "David Bennett" <david382@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2005 6:52 PM
Subject: [bookport] Re: Batteries
:I hate built-in batteries because there's always the looming spectre of
: having to send a unit in ever so often. I wouldn't like that one bit.
:
: ----- Original Message -----
: From: "David Allen" <wd8ldy@xxxxxxxxxx>
: To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
: Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2005 2:43 PM
: Subject: [bookport] Re: Batteries
:
:
: > Hi Walt and list:
: >
: > Internal batteries are a bad idea, especially if they can't be easily user
: > replaceable. I see this as one of the serious drawbacks of devices that
: > incorporate them.
: >
: > Cheers,
: > Dave
: >
: >
: >
:
:
:
Other related posts:
