I thought that the last time this came up here on the list, Larry indicated that support was available, but I no longer have his message. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Marlaina Lieberg" <marlaina@xxxxxxxxxx> To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Saturday, January 08, 2005 1:28 PM Subject: [bookport] Re: Aph's Policy Regarding Phone Support Michael, what are you talking about? The one time I needed support, Pamela provided it to me beautifully. So much so that I wrote to request that her supervisor be made aware of my extreme pleasure with her assistance and the manner in which she gave it. Marlaina Lieberg ----- Original Message ----- From: "Michael Massey" <micmey@xxxxxxxxxxx> To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Saturday, January 08, 2005 8:23 AM Subject: [bookport] Aph's Policy Regarding Phone Support > Hi. I've been reading all of the post regarding suggestions for > improvements to book port which leads me to these comments. > > I do sincerely wish that APh would reconsider its policy regarding phone > support for those who are using and testing the beta software and firmware. > However, the policy is the way it is and I will live with it. However, > there were a couple of instances where I needed phone support and could not > obtain it. Luckily, the problems that cropped up somehow resolved > themselves. > > Do I feel slighted just because those of us who use the beta software and > firmware can't get phone support? No, indeed not. But as I have stated in > previous posts, some times a phone call is the only way to solve a problem > rather than waiting for an e-mail message. When I needed help I needed it > immediately and couldn't get it. Yes, I am well aware of the policy and > read it before I downloaded the beta software and firmware. > > Michael Massey > > > > > __________ NOD32 1.966 (20050108) Information __________ > > This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system. > http://www.nod32.com > >