[bookport] Re: Any more fermware betas to come
- From: Ann Morris Bliss <annmorris@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, Audrey Schading <AudreyS@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 06 May 2005 14:58:44 -0400
Date: Fri, 06 May 2005 08:36:01 -0600
From: Michael Massey <micmey@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [bookport] Re: Any more fermware betas to come
Sender: bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To: bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Errors-to: bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Reply-to: bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Message-id: <000301c55248$ed478f20$a7e1a443@michaelhpnx2ej>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2527
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2527
Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-priority: Normal
Precedence: normal
Delivered-to: bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
X-Original-To: bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p9 (Debian) at avenirtech.net
X-archive-position: 6727
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
X-original-sender: micmey@xxxxxxxxxxx
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p9 (Debian) at avenirtech.net
References: <000801c55242$97fda9b0$4e052bd9@jolleybe0ls9mt>
<000701c55246$1586eec0$a7e1a443@michaelhpnx2ej>
<000301c55248$0e962110$4e052bd9@jolleybe0ls9mt>
X-List: bookport
Original-recipient: rfc822;annmorris@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi, James. I haven't fiddled with the note taker yet because I'm really not
that well versed in writing computer braille. I had commented that things
seemed slow on the list because it seemed that there weren't a lot of
messages. Yesterday things seemed to pick up a bit so I thought for certain
there was an update. How wrong I was, smile.
Mike
----- Original Message -----
From: "James Jolley" <james.jolley1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, May 06, 2005 8:29 AM
Subject: [bookport] Re: Any more fermware betas to come
> Hi Mike,
>
> Well it's not been slow but I dunno really was just curious I suppose
> because it would be nice to see if they can do some slight improvements
> but
> it's fairly good and stable as is. Use the note taker a lot, ideal if your
> out and someone gives you a number to write down.
>
> Best
>
> -James-
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Michael Massey" <micmey@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Friday, May 06, 2005 3:15 PM
> Subject: [bookport] Re: Any more fermware betas to come
>
>
>> Hi, James. You beat me to the punch, smile. I guess I was just waiting
>> for
>> someone else to ask the same question since things have been kinda slow
>> around here, grin.
>>
>> Mike
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "James Jolley" <james.jolley1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Sent: Friday, May 06, 2005 7:50 AM
>> Subject: [bookport] Any more fermware betas to come
>>
>>
>>> Hi Folks,
>>> Are nearing the end of this beta cycle or is there to be another release
>>> candidate?
>>>
>>> Also, it would be nice to have the C Key (volume down) work like the F
>>> key
>>> does for incrementing the voluming by five except of course decrimenting
>>> it when it is held down.
>>>
>>> Best
>>>
>>> -James-
>>>
>>>
>>
>Date: Fri, 06 May 2005 08:36:01 -0600
From: Michael Massey <micmey@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [bookport] Re: Any more fermware betas to come
Sender: bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To: bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Errors-to: bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Reply-to: bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Message-id: <000301c55248$ed478f20$a7e1a443@michaelhpnx2ej>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2527
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2527
Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-priority: Normal
Precedence: normal
Delivered-to: bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
X-Original-To: bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p9 (Debian) at avenirtech.net
X-archive-position: 6727
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
X-original-sender: micmey@xxxxxxxxxxx
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p9 (Debian) at avenirtech.net
References: <000801c55242$97fda9b0$4e052bd9@jolleybe0ls9mt>
<000701c55246$1586eec0$a7e1a443@michaelhpnx2ej>
<000301c55248$0e962110$4e052bd9@jolleybe0ls9mt>
X-List: bookport
Original-recipient: rfc822;annmorris@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi, James. I haven't fiddled with the note taker yet because I'm really not
that well versed in writing computer braille. I had commented that things
seemed slow on the list because it seemed that there weren't a lot of
messages. Yesterday things seemed to pick up a bit so I thought for certain
there was an update. How wrong I was, smile.
Mike
----- Original Message -----
From: "James Jolley" <james.jolley1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, May 06, 2005 8:29 AM
Subject: [bookport] Re: Any more fermware betas to come
> Hi Mike,
>
> Well it's not been slow but I dunno really was just curious I suppose
> because it would be nice to see if they can do some slight improvements
> but
> it's fairly good and stable as is. Use the note taker a lot, ideal if your
> out and someone gives you a number to write down.
>
> Best
>
> -James-
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Michael Massey" <micmey@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Friday, May 06, 2005 3:15 PM
> Subject: [bookport] Re: Any more fermware betas to come
>
>
>> Hi, James. You beat me to the punch, smile. I guess I was just waiting
>> for
>> someone else to ask the same question since things have been kinda slow
>> around here, grin.
>>
>> Mike
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "James Jolley" <james.jolley1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Sent: Friday, May 06, 2005 7:50 AM
>> Subject: [bookport] Any more fermware betas to come
>>
>>
>>> Hi Folks,
>>> Are nearing the end of this beta cycle or is there to be another release
>>> candidate?
>>>
>>> Also, it would be nice to have the C Key (volume down) work like the F
>>> key
>>> does for incrementing the voluming by five except of course decrimenting
>>> it when it is held down.
>>>
>>> Best
>>>
>>> -James-
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>>
>
>
>
At 08:36 AM 5/6/2005 -0600, you wrote:
>Date: Fri, 06 May 2005 08:36:01 -0600
>From: Michael Massey <micmey@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>Subject: [bookport] Re: Any more fermware betas to come
>Sender: bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>To: bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Errors-to: bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Reply-to: bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Message-id: <000301c55248$ed478f20$a7e1a443@michaelhpnx2ej>
>MIME-version: 1.0
>X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2527
>X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2527
>Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
>Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
>X-Priority: 3
>X-MSMail-priority: Normal
>Precedence: normal
>Delivered-to: bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>X-Original-To: bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p9 (Debian) at avenirtech.net
>X-archive-position: 6727
>X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
>X-original-sender: micmey@xxxxxxxxxxx
>X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p9 (Debian) at avenirtech.net
>References: <000801c55242$97fda9b0$4e052bd9@jolleybe0ls9mt>
> <000701c55246$1586eec0$a7e1a443@michaelhpnx2ej>
> <000301c55248$0e962110$4e052bd9@jolleybe0ls9mt>
>X-List: bookport
>Original-recipient: rfc822;annmorris@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>Hi, James. I haven't fiddled with the note taker yet because I'm really not
>that well versed in writing computer braille. I had commented that things
>seemed slow on the list because it seemed that there weren't a lot of
>messages. Yesterday things seemed to pick up a bit so I thought for certain
>there was an update. How wrong I was, smile.
>
>Mike
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "James Jolley" <james.jolley1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Sent: Friday, May 06, 2005 8:29 AM
>Subject: [bookport] Re: Any more fermware betas to come
>
>
> > Hi Mike,
> >
> > Well it's not been slow but I dunno really was just curious I suppose
> > because it would be nice to see if they can do some slight improvements
> > but
Date: Fri, 06 May 2005 08:36:01 -0600
From: Michael Massey <micmey@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [bookport] Re: Any more fermware betas to come
Sender: bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To: bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Errors-to: bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Reply-to: bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Message-id: <000301c55248$ed478f20$a7e1a443@michaelhpnx2ej>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2527
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2527
Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-priority: Normal
Precedence: normal
Delivered-to: bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
X-Original-To: bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p9 (Debian) at avenirtech.net
X-archive-position: 6727
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
X-original-sender: micmey@xxxxxxxxxxx
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p9 (Debian) at avenirtech.net
References: <000801c55242$97fda9b0$4e052bd9@jolleybe0ls9mt>
<000701c55246$1586eec0$a7e1a443@michaelhpnx2ej>
<000301c55248$0e962110$4e052bd9@jolleybe0ls9mt>
X-List: bookport
Original-recipient: rfc822;annmorris@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi, James. I haven't fiddled with the note taker yet because I'm really not
that well versed in writing computer braille. I had commented that things
seemed slow on the list because it seemed that there weren't a lot of
messages. Yesterday things seemed to pick up a bit so I thought for certain
there was an update. How wrong I was, smile.
Mike
----- Original Message -----
From: "James Jolley" <james.jolley1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, May 06, 2005 8:29 AM
Subject: [bookport] Re: Any more fermware betas to come
> Hi Mike,
>
> Well it's not been slow but I dunno really was just curious I suppose
> because it would be nice to see if they can do some slight improvements
> but
> it's fairly good and stable as is. Use the note taker a lot, ideal if your
> out and someone gives you a number to write down.
>
> Best
>
> -James-
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Michael Massey" <micmey@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Friday, May 06, 2005 3:15 PM
> Subject: [bookport] Re: Any more fermware betas to come
>
>
>> Hi, James. You beat me to the punch, smile. I guess I was just waiting
>> for
>> someone else to ask the same question since things have been kinda slow
>> around here, grin.
>>
>> Mike
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "James Jolley" <james.jolley1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Sent: Friday, May 06, 2005 7:50 AM
>> Subject: [bookport] Any more fermware betas to come
>>
>>
>>> Hi Folks,
>>> Are nearing the end of this beta cycle or is there to be another release
>>> candidate?
>>>
>>> Also, it would be nice to have the C Key (volume down) work like the F
>>> key
>>> does for incrementing the voluming by five except of course decrimenting
>>> it when it is held down.
>>>
>>> Best
>>>
>>> -James-
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>So SadHi, just wanted to tell you that my Friend, Lizz died. She was the
one with the dog at Joan's workshop in Huntington. I know I tried to help
her and we did some healings together.
Your Butterworth book came today. there was only one book enclosed
and I don't know if they were going to send the other one for you. Take care.
Love,
Ann
>
>
> > it's fairly good and stable as is. Use the note taker a lot, ideal if your
> > out and someone gives you a number to write down.
> >
> > Best
> >
> > -James-
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Michael Massey" <micmey@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Friday, May 06, 2005 3:15 PM
> > Subject: [bookport] Re: Any more fermware betas to come
> >
> >
> >> Hi, James. You beat me to the punch, smile. I guess I was just waiting
> >> for
> >> someone else to ask the same question since things have been kinda slow
> >> around here, grin.
> >>
> >> Mike
> >> ----- Original Message -----
> >> From: "James Jolley" <james.jolley1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Sent: Friday, May 06, 2005 7:50 AM
> >> Subject: [bookport] Any more fermware betas to come
> >>
> >>
> >>> Hi Folks,
> >>> Are nearing the end of this beta cycle or is there to be another release
> >>> candidate?
> >>>
> >>> Also, it would be nice to have the C Key (volume down) work like the F
> >>> key
> >>> does for incrementing the voluming by five except of course decrimenting
> >>> it when it is held down.
> >>>
> >>> Best
> >>>
> >>> -James-
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
Other related posts: