According to news reports, the juror was removed for cause after a hearing
and with the agreement of the prosecution and all of the defense teams so
there's no mistrial. There's generally no legal error when the court
and all of the parties agree on an issue and come to a plausible
resolution. There was an alternate juror available.
Jason Crotty
Portland
On Sunday, October 30, 2016, Pat <pat.truhn@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
It seems to me that removing that juror at the last minute should have
resulted in a mistrial and a do over! Disgusting and we need new
government leaders!
Sent from my iPad
On Oct 28, 2016, at 11:19 PM, Joel Geier <joel.geier@xxxxxxxx<javascript:;>> wrote:
with him here.
Lars and I have disagreed on few things over the years, but I agree
that next time we see something like this happening on our public lands, we
This jury ruling points us in the direction of Yugoslavia.It appears
should not expect the government to take care of it. Let the majority rule,
with whatever firearms they possess.
private-school environment at Marylhurst College, has any idea of the
I wonder if the apparently influential Juror #4, coming from a sheltered
consequences of his persuasiveness, and his effectiveness in getting the
one voice who opposed him dismissed from the jury?
POST: Send email to boo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <javascript:;>
Probably not. It's the rest of us who will have to deal with it.
--
Joel Geier
Camp Adair area north of Corvallis
HELP: Contact boo-moderators@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <javascript:;>
