Re: WINDOWS OR MAC? APPLE SAYS BOTH

  • From: "BlindTech of BlindTechs.Net" <blindtech@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: blindcasting@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2006 00:20:42 -0700

600 is quite a bit?
BlindTech of BlindTechs.Net
blindtech@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
website: http://blindtechs.net
Visit our website where we offer free email, shell accounts, shoutcast radio service, online games and more!
Powered by Unix not Microsoft



On Apr 6, 2006, at 1:36 PM, Steve Holmes wrote:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160

Actually I would be much happier if it were to go the other way - run
Mac OS X on generic Intel machines. I would love to run the Mac OS on
my currently owned windows box. In fact, if Voice over gets just a
little bit better, i would love to scrap winblows entirely and just run
the Mac and Linux partitions instead. But to buy a new Mac from start,
that would set me back quite a bit.


On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 03:21:45PM -0400, Jerry Halatyn wrote:
Windows will run natively on Intel-based Macs so,k yes, you can install
JAWS or any other Windows screen reader or screen access software. Very
exciting development.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Allison Mervis" <allisonfm@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <blindcasting@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2006 1:27 PM
Subject: Re: WINDOWS OR MAC? APPLE SAYS BOTH



I assume that we could potentially load jaws on to the Mac and use it with
XP, and then play with voiceover every now and then.
Allison








- -- HolmesGrown Solutions The best solutions for the best price! http://ld.net/?holmesgrown -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFENXvgWSjv55S0LfERA7p6AJwP2FtmfkItKdfvKYlYd7YQoqRHwACfaBPH
zLstf2XZEDdfWgU4HtSHy+0=
=qSuH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Other related posts: