Re: Disibility Node as part of categories ...

  • From: "Brent Harding" <bharding@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <blindcasting@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2005 21:03:29 -0500

If one does good show notes, they can pick up on the content of the show from them. In fact, that's why when I listen to a podcast, I don't read the notes before as it almost spoils it. They are a good resource after listening to see the things mentioned as linked from a more complete article, and almost anyone can read them. Leo Laport and Steve Gipson get their security now podcast transcribed. I wonder how much something like that costs, and how much a person doing such work would be paid for such if the places that provide that service are even hiring?

----- Original Message ----- From: "Darrell Shandrow" <nu7i@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <blindcasting@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, October 15, 2005 9:11 AM
Subject: Re: Disibility Node as part of categories ...

Hi Jennifer,

Excellent comments and right on! Most importantly, we should not, in any way shape or form, put up any barriers to participation for the deaf, hearing impaired or anyone else for that matter. Given all the artificially imposed obstacles with which we must deal on a daily basis, we should all know better...

Last week, Adam Curry simply distributed a short M4A containing a short video suitable for playing on the new Video iPods, so we know it is already being done.

Darrell Shandrow - Shandrow Communications!
Technology consultant/instructor, network/systems administrator!
A+, CSSA, Network+!
Check out high quality telecommunications services at
Information should be accessible to us without need of translation by another person.
Blind Access Journal blog:
----- Original Message ----- From: "Jennifer Sutton" <jensutton@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <blindcasting@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, October 15, 2005 6:50 AM
Subject: Re: Disibility Node as part of categories ...

Hello to all who are trying to speculate on whether or not deaf people care or are involved in podcasts:

I'd like to respectfully suggest that we, as blind folks, simply do not know, nor should we try to guess what Deaf (or deaf) people are doing with podcasts.

Would we like it if deaf people were speculating about us, our needs, and what we do or do not see or want?

We have no idea, for example, what could possibly be done by organizations who currently provide audio podcasts, but could, given the availability of video ipods, also provide transcripts if they wished. It's even conceivable to me that those transcripts could be synchronized with the audio.

As someone suggested, there is video blogging, and with the new video ipods, I wonder whether that may, eventually, be included in the directories. It may not be, but it might be. Who actually knows? Who has defined a podcast as ONLY being audio-based, period?

Just as there is a spectrum of what it means to be blind, there's a wide spectrum in the deaf community in terms of who can hear what and how. Plenty of deaf people can talk which seems contrary to the way people are imagining deafness on this list.

So, as with other ideas about which there's considerable speculation about what is, and is not being done by podcasters with disabilities, I would encourage us all to wait and see who shows up and who's doing what with which technologies..

By the way, my grandparents were deaf, so I would suggest that I actually have some credibility to speak on this subject.


Other related posts: