Come on people, let's see if we can raise some hell!! On 5/29/09, The Elf <inthaneelf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > read and do what you can folks, if we want to be able to read things in > the future! > > inthane > Begin forwarded message: > > > > Subject: Cory Doctorow: USA, Canada and the EU attempt to kill treaty to > protect blind people's access to written material > > Reply-To: Manon Ress <manon.ress@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > http://www.boingboing.net/2009/05/29/usa-canada-and-the-e.html > > USA, Canada and the EU attempt to kill treaty to protect blind people's > access to written material > > Posted by Cory Doctorow, May 29, 2009 1:52 AM > > Right now, in Geneva, at the UN's World Intellectual Property Organization, > history is being made. For the first time in WIPO history, the body that > creates the world's copyright treaties is attempting to write a copyright > treaty dedicated to protecting the interests of copyright users, not just > copyright owners. > > At issue is a treaty to protect the rights of blind people and people with > other disabilities that affect reading (people with dyslexia, people who are > paralyzed or lack arms or hands for turning pages). This should be a slam > dunk: who wouldn't want a harmonized system of copyright exceptions that > ensure that it's possible for disabled people to get access to the written > word? > > The USA, that's who. The Obama administration's negotiators have joined with > a rogue's gallery of rich country trade representatives to oppose protection > for blind people. Other nations and regions opposing the rights of blind > people include Canada and the EU. > > Update: Also opposing rights for disabled people: Australia, New Zealand, > the Vatican and Norway. > > Activists at WIPO are desperate to get the word out. They're tweeting madly > from the negotiation (technically called the 18th session of the Standing > Committee on Copyright and Related Rights) publishing editorials on the > Huffington Post, etc. > > Here's where you come in: this has to get wide exposure, to get cast as > broadly as possible, so that it will find its way into the ears of the > obscure power-brokers who control national trade-negotiators. > > I don't often ask readers to do things like this, but please, forward this > post to people you know in the US, Canada and the EU, and ask them to > reblog, tweet, and spread the word, especially to government officials and > activists who work on disabled rights. We know that WIPO negotiations can be > overwhelmed by citizen activists -- that's how we killed the Broadcast > Treaty negotiation a few years back -- and with your help, we can make > history, and create a world where copyright law protects the public > interest. > > I am attending a meeting in Geneva of the World Intellectual Property > Organization (WIPO). This evening the United States government, in > combination with other high income countries in "Group B" is seeking to > block an agreement to discuss a treaty for persons who are blind or have > other reading disabilities. > > The proposal for a treaty is supported by a large number of civil society > NGOs, the World Blind Union, the National Federation of the Blind in the US, > the International DAISY Consortium, Recording for the Blind & Dyslexic > (RFB&D), Bookshare.Org, and groups representing persons with reading > disabilities all around the world. > > The main aim of the treaty is to allow the cross-border import and export > of digital copies of books and other copyrighted works in formats that are > accessible to persons who are blind, visually impaired, dyslexic or have > other reading disabilities, using special devices that present text as > refreshable braille, computer generated text to speech, or large type. These > works, which are expensive to make, are typically created under national > exceptions to copyright law that are specifically written to benefit persons > with disabilities... > > The opposition from the United States and other high income countries is > due to intense lobbying from a large group of publishers that oppose a > "paradigm shift," where treaties would protect consumer interests, rather > than expand rights for copyright owners. > > The Obama Administration was lobbied heavily on this issue, including > meetings with high level White House officials. Assurances coming into the > negotiations this week that things were going in the right direction have > turned out to be false, as the United States delegation has basically read > from a script written by lobbyists for publishers, extolling the virtues of > market based solutions, ignoring mountains of evidence of a "book famine" > and the insane legal barriers to share works. > > Obama Joins Group to Block Treaty for Blind and Other Reading Disabilities > > COPYRIGHT EXCEPTIONS AND LIMITATIONS > > Twitter feed for #sccr18 > > *************************************************************************** > blind_html To unsubscribe, please send a blank email to blind_html-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with unsubscribe in the subject line. To access the archives, please visit: //www.freelists.org/archive/blind_html Thanks