blind_html Re: blhadtml Re: validating question

  • From: Nimer Jaber <nimerjaber1@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: blind_html@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2007 17:56:12 -0700

Maybe someone else on this list can shed some light on this matter.
Nimer Just
On Fri, 23 Nov 2007 12:09:46 -0800, Sarah wrote:

>Hmm if ou can get the book absolute beginner's guide to building web 
>pages or use this as a referencr. 
>----- Original Message ----- 
>From: "Nimer Jaber" <nimerjaber1@xxxxxxxxx>
>To: <blind_html@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Sent: Friday, November 23, 2007 11:58 AM
>Subject: blind_html Re: validating question
>I may be wrong, but I don't think so.
>On 11/23/07, Sarah <marrie12@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>O wow! that's not the way the w3 schools does things. Also that's not 
>>way the book I was reading also does things. they had
>>the html opening and closing tags in there as well as the doc type.
>>----- Original Message -----
>>From: "Nimer Jaber" <nimerjaber1@xxxxxxxxx>
>>To: <blind_html@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>Sent: Friday, November 23, 2007 1:13 AM
>>Subject: blind_html Re: validating question
>>Your html doctype tag up top counts as your html tag. You have the
>><html doctype ...> tag and under it you have the <html> tag. You don't
>>need both of those.
>>Nimer J
>>On 11/22/07, Sarah <marrie12@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>No I jus checked my code and I only have one <html> tag at the top and 
>>></html> tag at the bottom.
>>>----- Original Message -----
>>>From: "Nimer Jaber" <nimerjaber1@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>To: <blind_html@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2007 3:53 PM
>>>Subject: blind_html Re: validating question
>>>Let's see. I believe you have an extra html tag up top. Take one of them
>>>out. Other then that, I don't know. Maybe someone can help out.
>>>Nimer J
>>>Nimer Jaber
>>>Confidentiality Notice:
>>>Unless otherwise indicated, anything in the above email may _not be
>>>distributed via forwarding or copying to anyone through email
>>>or the internet as the contents of this email are confidential and are
>>>intended to the recipient of this email. If you have
>>>received this email an error, or you feel that this email was not 
>>>towards you, please notify the sender via reply and
>>>destroy the contents of this email immediately. Failure to comply with 
>>>of the terms above may result in civil or criminal
>>>charges. If you feel there is an error with any of the content presented
>>>the above email, please contact me with the methods
>>>listed below.
>>>Cell: (720) (278-6583)
>>>Or, feel free to visit my site at

Other related posts: