blind_html [Nimer's Political Blog] [Fwd: There Are No More Jihadists]

  • From: Nimer Jaber <nimerjaber1@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: blind_html@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 17:57:44 -0700 (PDT)

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: There Are No More Jihadists
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 19:21:32 -0500
From: Travis <baconlard@xxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: politics-current-events@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To: baconlard@xxxxxxxxx
References: <e9bd100965b46faea4694c5fde1e2ad2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

There Are No More Jihadists
August 11, 2009
John Brennan, Obama's assistant for homeland security and
counter-terrorism, has come forth and enlightened the world with the
news that there are no "jihadists
Mr. Brennan/Obama says that jihad is an inner struggle and inner
purification-a purely spiritual process, and when we call them
jihadists, they obtain a religious legitimacy they don't deserve. He
goes further to say that we are actually at war with al Qaeda and its
"extremist" allies.
And who is Brennan's source for the "truth"? Obama. Hmmm. Obama? Since
when is Obama an expert on the foundation of Islam? We have had another
president, Bush, make his own declarations about what Islam is and he
has no more basis to be a foundation of Islam than Obama. Democrats and
Republicans are joined at the ideological hip when it comes to Islam,
for both are profoundly ignorant about its political doctrine and
history. One is dumb, the other is dumber -- and you can argue over
which is what.
No matter what Brennan/Obama says, the only foundation of Islam is the
Koran and the Sunna of Mohammed. (The Sunna is composed of the Sira,
Mohammed's biography, and the Hadith, his traditions.) If we wanted to
know what a jihadist is, why not go to the Koran
and Hadith
Why listen to second-hand hearsay from a politician when you can listen
to Allah and Mohammed? Who would you trust, Brennan/Obama or Mohammed?
The answer from 1.2 billion Muslims is-trust Mohammed.
What does Mohammed say about jihad? Is it inner struggle or killing
kafirs? All three texts have much to say about jihad. In the Hadith by
Bukhari approximately 20% of the text is about jihad. Actually, the
Hadith is a textbook about the tactics of jihad. Do we find jihad as the
inner struggle in the Hadith? Yes, but we also find jihad as the killing
of kafirs. Do some simple math and you will discover that around 97% of
the text concerning jihad is about the killing of kafirs and 3% is the
jihad of inner struggle, the so-called greater jihad.
The Sira, Mohammed's biography by Ishaq, devotes a lot of attention to
jihad. About 70% of the Sira is about jihad. But there is not a single
mention of the inner struggle jihad, only killing kafirs.
The Koran calls jihad "fighting in Allah's cause" and the jihad is about
the killing of kafirs.
Having two kinds of jihad is a part of Islamic dualism. Islam is built
on two principles, submission and duality. Dualism is its great
strength. It allows Islam to hold two contradictory views at the same
time. So while jihadists are killing kafirs, Islam is proclaiming itself
to be peaceful. Then ignorant kafirs argue about which is the true
nature, completely missing the point that Islamic reasoning allows such
contradictions to be true for both sides.
There is a clash here between reasoning systems. Brennan/Obama are about
authoritarian reasoning. Brennan/Obama are right because they have
power, and they assert their power of truth by declaration. They are
right because they are powerful.
The other system of reasoning is critical thinking, also called
scientific thinking . Notice how different the two systems are. One of
them depends upon acceptance of authority, the other depends upon data
that anyone can go and check out for them selves.
Obama gave his vision of Official Islam
in Cairo. Official Islam is based upon his authority, but Official Islam
is not to be found in the Koran, Sira and Hadith. Obama declared there
were no jihadists in his speech in Cairo and called them extremists. How
can a Muslim be an extremist if he doing what Mohammed did? Mohammed
defines Islam. Mohammed was a jihadist who killed many kafirs, hence,
being a jihadist is an Islamic doctrinal model, not an extremist
What difference does the name make? It just depends on what you want --
scientific truth or fantasy. Official Islam is a fantasy and a
deliberate fraud. Official Islam is a Big Lie.

Bill Warner
copyright (c) CBSX, LLC
Use and distribute as you wish; do not edit and give us credit.

This message was sent from Bill Warner. It was sent from: Political
Islam . com, Suite 500 3212 West End Av , Nashville, TN 37203. You can
modify/update your subscription via the link below.
Email Marketing by <>
iContact - Try It Free! <>


You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Politics & Current Events" group.
To post to this group, send email to
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
For more options, visit this group at

Posted By Nimer Jaber to Nimer's Political Blog at 8/11/2009 06:57:00 PM

Other related posts:

  • » blind_html [Nimer's Political Blog] [Fwd: There Are No More Jihadists] - Nimer Jaber