© First Look Media. All rights reserved
The
Intercept_
Glenn _Greenwald
f
⎕
Photo: Brendan Smialowski/AFP/Getty Images
EXCLUSIVE: New Email Leak Reveals Clinton Campaign’s Cozy Press Relationship
Glenn Greenwald Lee Fang
Glenn Greenwald, Lee Fang
October 9 2016, 11:47 a.m.
Photo: Brendan Smialowski/AFP/Getty Images
Internal strategy documents and emails among Clinton staffers shed light on
friendly and highly useful relationships between the campaign and various
members of the U.S. media, as well as the campaign’s strategies for
manipulating those relationships.
The emails were provided to The Intercept by the source identifying himself as
Guccifer 2.0, who was reportedly responsible for prior significant hacks,
including one that targeted the Democratic National Committee and resulted in
the resignations of its top four officials. On Friday, Obama administration
officials claimed that Russia’s “senior-most officials” were responsible for
that hack and others, although they provided no evidence for that assertion.
As these internal documents demonstrate, a central component of the Clinton
campaign strategy is ensuring that journalists they believe are favorable to
Clinton are tasked to report the stories the campaign wants circulated.
At times, Clinton’s campaign staff not only internally drafted the stories they
wanted published but even specified what should be quoted “on background” and
what should be described as “on the record.”
One January 2015 strategy document — designed to plant stories on Clinton’s
decision-making process about whether to run for president — singled out
reporter Maggie Haberman, then of Politico, now covering the election for the
New York Times, as a “friendly journalist” who has “teed up” stories for them
in the past and “never disappointed” them. Nick Merrill, the campaign press
secretary, produced the memo, according to the document metadata:
That strategy document plotted how Clinton aides could induce Haberman to write
a story on the thoroughness and profound introspection involved in Clinton’s
decision-making process. The following month, when she was at the Times,
Haberman published two stories on Clinton’s vetting process; in this instance,
Haberman’s stories were more sophisticated, nuanced, and even somewhat more
critical than what the Clinton memo envisioned.
But they nonetheless accomplished the goal Clinton campaign aides wanted to
fulfill of casting the appearance of transparency on Clinton’s vetting process
in a way that made clear she was moving carefully but inexorably toward a
presidential run.
Given more than 24 hours to challenge the authenticity of these documents and
respond, Merrill did not reply to our emails. Haberman declined to comment.
Other documents listed those whom the campaign regarded as their most reliable
“surrogates” — such as CNN’s Hilary Rosen and Donna Brazile, as well as Center
for American Progress President Neera Tanden — but then also listed operatives
whom they believed were either good “progressive helpers” or more potentially
friendly media figures who might be worth targeting with messaging. The
metadata of the surrogate document shows the file was authored by Jennifer
Palmieri, the communications director of the campaign. As The Intercept
previously reported, pundits regularly featured on cable news programs were
paid by the Clinton campaign without any disclosure when they appeared; several
of them are included on this “surrogates” list, including Stephanie Cutter and
Maria Cardona:
The Clinton campaign likes to use glitzy, intimate, completely off-the-record
parties between top campaign aides and leading media personalities. One of the
most elaborately planned get-togethers was described in an April, 2015, memo —
produced, according to the document metadata, by deputy press secretary Jesse
Ferguson — to take place shortly before Clinton’s official announcement of her
candidacy. The event was an April 10 cocktail party for leading news figures
and top-level Clinton staff at the Upper East Side home of Clinton strategist
Joel Benenson, a fully off-the-record gathering designed to impart the
campaign’s messaging:
A separate email chain between Clinton staff (one that was not among those
provided by Guccifer 2.0 but appeared on the DCLeaks.com site earlier this
week) contains plans for a separate off-the-record media get-together in May.
Food and drinks were provided by the campaign for the journalists covering it,
on the condition that nothing said would be reported to the public.
Many of the enduring Clinton tactics for managing the press were created by the
campaign before she even announced her candidacy. A March 13, 2015, memo from
Clinton campaign manager Robby Mook provides insight into some of the tactics
employed by the campaign to shape coverage to their liking. In particular, Mook
was concerned that because journalists were assigned to cover Clinton, they
needed to be fed a constant stream of stories that the campaign liked. As he
put it, a key strategy was to “give reporters who must cover daily HRC news
something to cover other than the unhelpful stories about the foundation,
emails, etc.”
All presidential campaigns have their favorite reporters, try to plant stories
they want published, and attempt in multiple ways to curry favor with
journalists. These tactics are certainly not unique to the Clinton campaign
(liberals were furious in 2008 when journalists went to John McCain’s Arizona
ranch for an off-the-record BBQ). But these rituals and dynamics between
political campaigns and the journalists who cover them are typically carried
out in the dark, despite how significant they can be. These documents provide a
valuable glimpse into that process.
Top photo: Hillary Clinton looks at national press secretary Brian Fallon’s
phone, with aide Huma Abedin and traveling press secretary Nick Merrill.
≡
• English
• Português
🔍
• Glenn Greenwald
• Unofficial Sources
• Robert Mackey
• Features
• Documents
• About & Contacts
ft© First Look Media. All rights reserved
• Terms of use
• Privacy
• Sitemap
Glenn _Greenwald
f
t
✉
⎕
370
Photo: Brendan Smialowski/AFP/Getty Images
EXCLUSIVE: New Email Leak Reveals Clinton Campaign’s Cozy Press Relationship
/staff/glenn-greenwald/Glenn Greenwald/staff/leefang/Lee Fang
/staff/glenn-greenwald//staff/glenn-greenwald//staff/leefang//staff/leefang/
/staff/glenn-greenwald//staff/leefang/
October 9 2016, 11:47 a.m.
Internal strategy documents and emails among Clinton staffers shed light on
friendly and highly useful relationships between the campaign and various
members of the U.S. media, as well as the campaign’s strategies for
manipulating those relationships.
The emails were provided to The Intercept by the source identifying himself as
Guccifer 2.0, who was reportedly responsible for prior significant hacks,
including one that targeted the Democratic National Committee and resulted in
the resignations of its top four officials. On Friday, Obama administration
officials claimed that Russia’s “senior-most officials” were responsible for
that hack and others, although they provided no evidence for that assertion.
As these internal documents demonstrate, a central component of the Clinton
campaign strategy is ensuring that journalists they believe are favorable to
Clinton are tasked to report the stories the campaign wants circulated.
At times, Clinton’s campaign staff not only internally drafted the stories they
wanted published but even specified what should be quoted “on background” and
what should be described as “on the record.”
One January 2015 strategy document — designed to plant stories on Clinton’s
decision-making process about whether to run for president — singled out
reporter Maggie Haberman, then of Politico, now covering the election for the
New York Times, as a “friendly journalist” who has “teed up” stories for them
in the past and “never disappointed” them. Nick Merrill, the campaign press
secretary, produced the memo, according to the document metadata:
https://prod01-cdn07.cdn.firstlook.org/wp-uploads/sites/1/2016/10/maggie.pnghttps://prod01-cdn07.cdn.firstlook.org/wp-uploads/sites/1/2016/10/maggie.png
That strategy document plotted how Clinton aides could induce Haberman to write
a story on the thoroughness and profound introspection involved in Clinton’s
decision-making process. The following month, when she was at the Times,
Haberman published two stories on Clinton’s vetting process; in this instance,
Haberman’s stories were more sophisticated, nuanced, and even somewhat more
critical than what the Clinton memo envisioned.
But they nonetheless accomplished the goal Clinton campaign aides wanted to
fulfill of casting the appearance of transparency on Clinton’s vetting process
in a way that made clear she was moving carefully but inexorably toward a
presidential run.
Given more than 24 hours to challenge the authenticity of these documents and
respond, Merrill did not reply to our emails. Haberman declined to comment.
Other documents listed those whom the campaign regarded as their most reliable
“surrogates” — such as CNN’s Hilary Rosen and Donna Brazile, as well as Center
for American Progress President Neera Tanden — but then also listed operatives
whom they believed were either good “progressive helpers” or more potentially
friendly media figures who might be worth targeting with messaging. The
metadata of the surrogate document shows the file was authored by Jennifer
Palmieri, the communications director of the campaign. As The Intercept
previously reported, pundits regularly featured on cable news programs were
paid by the Clinton campaign without any disclosure when they appeared; several
of them are included on this “surrogates” list, including Stephanie Cutter and
Maria Cardona:
https://prod01-cdn07.cdn.firstlook.org/wp-uploads/sites/1/2016/10/medialist.pnghttps://prod01-cdn07.cdn.firstlook.org/wp-uploads/sites/1/2016/10/medialist.png
The Clinton campaign likes to use glitzy, intimate, completely off-the-record
parties between top campaign aides and leading media personalities. One of the
most elaborately planned get-togethers was described in an April, 2015, memo —
produced, according to the document metadata, by deputy press secretary Jesse
Ferguson — to take place shortly before Clinton’s official announcement of her
candidacy. The event was an April 10 cocktail party for leading news figures
and top-level Clinton staff at the Upper East Side home of Clinton strategist
Joel Benenson, a fully off-the-record gathering designed to impart the
campaign’s messaging:
https://prod01-cdn07.cdn.firstlook.org/wp-uploads/sites/1/2016/10/cocktail1.pnghttps://prod01-cdn07.cdn.firstlook.org/wp-uploads/sites/1/2016/10/cocktail1.png
https://prod01-cdn07.cdn.firstlook.org/wp-uploads/sites/1/2016/10/cocktail2.pnghttps://prod01-cdn07.cdn.firstlook.org/wp-uploads/sites/1/2016/10/cocktail2.png
https://prod01-cdn07.cdn.firstlook.org/wp-uploads/sites/1/2016/10/cocktail31.pnghttps://prod01-cdn07.cdn.firstlook.org/wp-uploads/sites/1/2016/10/cocktail31.png
https://prod01-cdn07.cdn.firstlook.org/wp-uploads/sites/1/2016/10/cocktail4.pnghttps://prod01-cdn07.cdn.firstlook.org/wp-uploads/sites/1/2016/10/cocktail4.png
A separate email chain between Clinton staff (one that was not among those
provided by Guccifer 2.0 but appeared on the DCLeaks.com site earlier this
week) contains plans for a separate off-the-record media get-together in May.
Food and drinks were provided by the campaign for the journalists covering it,
on the condition that nothing said would be reported to the public.
Many of the enduring Clinton tactics for managing the press were created by the
campaign before she even announced her candidacy. A March 13, 2015, memo from
Clinton campaign manager Robby Mook provides insight into some of the tactics
employed by the campaign to shape coverage to their liking. In particular, Mook
was concerned that because journalists were assigned to cover Clinton, they
needed to be fed a constant stream of stories that the campaign liked. As he
put it, a key strategy was to “give reporters who must cover daily HRC news
something to cover other than the unhelpful stories about the foundation,
emails, etc.”
https://prod01-cdn07.cdn.firstlook.org/wp-uploads/sites/1/2016/10/mookmemo.pnghttps://prod01-cdn07.cdn.firstlook.org/wp-uploads/sites/1/2016/10/mookmemo.png
All presidential campaigns have their favorite reporters, try to plant stories
they want published, and attempt in multiple ways to curry favor with
journalists. These tactics are certainly not unique to the Clinton campaign
(liberals were furious in 2008 when journalists went to John McCain’s Arizona
ranch for an off-the-record BBQ). But these rituals and dynamics between
political campaigns and the journalists who cover them are typically carried
out in the dark, despite how significant they can be. These documents provide a
valuable glimpse into that process.
Top photo: Hillary Clinton looks at national press secretary Brian Fallon’s
phone, with aide Huma Abedin and traveling press secretary Nick Merrill.
