Well, if we are talking about economics you really should think of the
economic system that is being talked about. Slavery is an economic
system and feudalism is an economic system. Slavery tends to transform
into feudalism and even so, both can exist at the same time and as
subsets of a broader economic system. It should also be realized that
the transformation does not just happen at random. Under a slave system
slaves do not want to be slaves and the slave holders do want them to be
slaves. As the slave struggles to become free the slave holder resists
the struggles of the slave. When the struggle advances to a certain
point the slaves do free themselves, but because of the resistance of
the slave holders the freedom is not complete. The slave holders may
want to maintain slavery, but the time comes that it becomes clear that
to continue to maintain that slavery will more likely result in one's
own death and so some concessions have to be made while every effort is
made to hold onto as much power as possible. That is how feudalism comes
about. That is exactly what happened to slavery in more modern times
too. The struggle came to a crisis point with the American civil war.
When the war was over the slaves had become sharecroppers, that is,
feudal serfs. The whole time this was playing out under capitalism and
capitalism has its own contradictions. What I am describing is the
dialectics of history. Without analyzing the dialectical dynamics you
will be able to see a pattern in history, but you will not have the
basis for a law of history. With an understanding of the dialectical
dynamics you can start talking about laws. However, this is not a law in
the same sense as Boyle's law of gas behavior. In that case every time
you try to apply it, it works. That is probably because there are a hell
of a lot more gas molecules than there are humans to work with. If you
only dealt with mere millions of gas molecules the behavior would
probably be more erratic too. The laws of history are more accurately
tendencies. There are sidetracks. There are regressions. There are
differing rates of speed. Nevertheless, though, if you take the long
view of history you can see the patterns and you can work out the
dialectical dynamics. This is a long way from saying that these laws are
immutable. That comment about the immutable laws of history is another
one of those straw man arguments. If Marx had ever said that each stage
of history progresses in a specific way and that the way isi immutable
then, of course, he would be wrong. Arguing against him as if he did say
that is arguing against something other than Marx. I think it is
actually arguing against certain kinds of fortune tellers.
On 12/11/2015 9:55 PM, Miriam Vieni wrote:
I never even thought about slavery in relation to the Roman Empire. Sorry. All
I thought about was military conquest and the crucifixion of dissenters. But I
should have because I read that wonderful book by Howard Fast about the Roman
slave whose name everyone knows, but which, of course, has slipped my mind.
Miriam
-----Original Message-----
From: blind-democracy-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:blind-democracy-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Roger Loran Bailey (Redacted sender "rogerbailey81" for DMARC)
Sent: Friday, December 11, 2015 8:08 PM
To: blind-democracy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [blind-democracy] Re: [blind-democracy] RE: [blind-democracy] Re:
[blind-democracy] RE: [blind-democracy] Re: [blind-democracy] RE:
[blind-democracy] ‘Lesser-evil’ politics from Trump to Sanders
I don't know where you get this stuff about immutable, but I am interested in
something else you said. Do you really believe that a transition from slavery
to sharecropping, even a brutally enforced form of sharecropping, was not an
improvement? What do you think the freed slaves would say to you about that?
On 12/11/2015 6:01 PM, Miriam Vieni wrote:
You need to know that I have no idea what you mean by "the laws of history",
but I assume that your talking abouthow Marxist theory describes changes over time,
dialectic something or other? I know I read all this in college, but I surely didn't
focus on it. I gather that you believe that there are immutable laws in history, sort of
like in physics except that because we're talking about the social sciences, individual
activists can kind of help things move along. I suppose that the problem is that the
imperfections of human nature keep messing up each system that has developed. Feudalism
was not an improvement on the Roman empire, just a change. Communism, as it developed in
Russia and China, wasn't better for people than American capitalism. I do like the social
democracies of Scandanavia and Great Britain and France were OK for a brief period of
time, as was the US for about 30 years. But things go on changing - those immutable laws
of history, I suppose, and they seem to get worse, not better.
Miriam
-----Original Message-----
From: blind-democracy-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:blind-democracy-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Roger Loran
Bailey (Redacted sender "rogerbailey81" for DMARC)
Sent: Friday, December 11, 2015 3:40 PM
To: blind-democracy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [blind-democracy] Re: [blind-democracy] RE: [blind-democracy]
Re: [blind-democracy] RE: [blind-democracy] ‘Lesser-evil’ politics
from Trump to Sanders
It was followed by feudalism though. Do you think that the Roman Empire was
immune to the laws of history? If so, then what do you call the economic system
that replaced it if not feudalism?
On 12/11/2015 3:31 PM, Miriam Vieni wrote:
I don't know about the laws of history, but I do know about the
political character of the US population And I also know that climate change is
moving at such a rate that its consequences will eliminate human life unless
immediate changes take place in how we live. I don't see the US moving toward
socialism. When the Roman empire imploded, it wasn't followed by peace and
equality throughout the world.
Miriam
-----Original Message-----
From: blind-democracy-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:blind-democracy-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Roger
Loran Bailey (Redacted sender "rogerbailey81" for DMARC)
Sent: Friday, December 11, 2015 3:04 PM
To: blind-democracy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [blind-democracy] Re: [blind-democracy] RE:
[blind-democracy] ‘Lesser-evil’ politics from Trump to Sanders
Can you think of any reason that the US would be immune to the laws of history?
On 12/11/2015 11:30 AM, Miriam Vieni wrote:
Aside from a few mis statements, this is a pretty good summary of the
situation. The problem is, I feel like it leaves us nowhere. Does the Socialist
Workers' Party or any other socialist of communist party actually think that
there can be a socialist revolution in the US? I suppose that hope springs
eternal for some folks.
Miriam
-----Original Message-----
From: blind-democracy-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:blind-democracy-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Roger
Loran Bailey (Redacted sender "rogerbailey81" for DMARC)
Sent: Friday, December 11, 2015 10:19 AM
To: blind-democracy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [blind-democracy] ‘Lesser-evil’ politics from Trump to
Sanders
http://socialistaction.org/
‘Lesser-evil’ politics from Trump to Sanders
Published December 10, 2015. | By Socialist Action.
Sasha Murphy, of the ANSWER Coalition, leads demonstrators in a chant during a protest
against Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump's hosting "Saturday Night
Live" in New York, Saturday, Nov. 7, 2015. Despite a 40-year history of lampooning
politicians while inviting some to mock themselves as on-air guests, booking a
presidential candidate to host the NBC sketch-comedy show is almost unprecedented.
(AP Photo/Patrick Sison)
Sasha Murphy, of the ANSWER Coalition, leads demonstrators in a chant during a protest
against Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump's hosting "Saturday Night
Live" in New York, Saturday, Nov. 7, 2015. Despite a 40-year history of lampooning
politicians while inviting some to mock themselves as on-air guests, booking a
presidential candidate to host the NBC sketch-comedy show is almost unprecedented.
(AP Photo/Patrick Sison)
By JEFF MACKLER
That the leading Republican Party presidential candidate, multi-billionaire
Donald Trump, is a full-blown reactionary caricature of a capitalist politician
is now the common parlance of most major media outlets. Even the relatively
conservative Washington Post featured a Dec. 1 Dana Milibank column entitled,
“Donald Trump Racist Bigot.”
Milibank, reflecting the general unease at Trump’s virulently racist,
misogynist, and xenophobic outbursts, wrote: “Let’s not mince words:
Donald Trump is a bigot and a racist. … There is a great imperative
not to be silent in the face of demagoguery. Trump in this campaign
has gone after African Americans, immigrants, Latinos, Asians,
women, Muslims and now the disabled…
“It might be possible to explain away any one of Trump’s outrages as a mistake
or a misunderstanding. But at some point you’re not merely saying things that
could be construed as bigoted: You are a bigot.
“It has been more than a quarter century since Trump took out ads in New York
newspapers calling for the death penalty for “criminals of every age” after
five black and Latino teens were implicated in the Central Park jogger case.
The young men, convicted and imprisoned, were later cleared by DNA evidence and
the confession of a serial rapist—and Trump called their wrongful-conviction
settlement a ‘disgrace.’”
“Since then,” Milibank continued, “Trump led the ‘birther’ movement challenging
President Obama’s standing as a natural-born American; used various vulgar
expressions to refer to women; spoke of Mexico sending rapists and other
criminals across the border; called for rounding up and deporting 11 million
illegal immigrants; had high-profile spats with prominent Latino journalists
and news outlets; mocked Asian accents; let stand a charge made in his presence
that Obama is a Muslim and that Muslims are a ‘problem’ in America; embraced
the notion of forcing Muslims to register in a database; falsely claimed
thousands of Muslims celebrated the 9/11 attacks in New Jersey; tweeted bogus
statistics asserting that most killings of whites are done by blacks; approved
of the roughing up of a black demonstrator at one of his events; and publicly
mocked the [physical] movements of New York Times (and former Washington Post)
journalist Serge Kovaleski, who has a chronic condition limiting mobility.”
What is perhaps a bit different in today’s virtually year-round election
hyperbole is the fact that virtually every one of the dozen or so Republican
presidential contenders have remained all but silent as Trump daily spews out
his noxious diatribes. Indeed, until quite recently, most of the corporate
media relished covering Trump’s every anti-social rant, fearful perhaps that
failure to do so might lose them critical media ratings.
Trump himself has repeatedly affirmed that any coverage, especially free media
coverage—and to date he has by far had the lion’s share of the latter—could
only work to his advantage.
On Nov. 8, Trump delighted in the opportunity to appear on the popular
“Saturday Night Live” television show, where wacked-out comedian Larry David,
who plays the part of an obnoxious liberal racist on his “Curb Your Enthusiasm”
show, took up DeportRacism.com’s offer of a $5000 prize to publicly heckle
Trump and call him a racist. David, who has yet to collect his winnings, did
just that—with Trump’s explicit and prior, if not enthusiastic, agreement. In
capitalist America today, a real live, laughing, racist billionaire is a
profitable talent to broadcast!
Meanwhile, the front-running Trump has a dozen Republican challengers,
including the second in the polls—retired surgeon, Christian fundamentalist,
and climate and evolution denier Ben Carson. All afford Trump virtually free
rein in his fear and hate-mongering campaign, with a few occasionally and
cautiously seizing the opportunity to one-up this racist bigot in order to
better capture an ever greater portion of the Republican Party’s alienated,
largely middle-class, Tea Party-enthusiast voter base.
No doubt Trump’s rants find fertile soil in a small layer of the overall
electorate, but even less in the general population, some half of which
increasingly does not bother to vote.
But Trump’s backwater histrionics are not new to the increasingly polarized and
crisis-ridden world capitalist scene. Overtly far-right, if not neo-fascist,
views are similarly expressed in France, England, and across Europe. In the
former two nations such right-wing parties have, for the first time in nearly a
century, outpolled the traditional capitalist stalwart parties of the status
quo.
Trump is the American reflection of overtly racist and neo-fascist ideology— if
not a conscious experiment with it. His racist rants in some instances have
encouraged the use of violent physical attacks by his disaffected followers,
who find his scapegoating of the oppressed to their liking.
Democratic Party charade
On the Democratic Party side of capitalism’s electoral charade, this
ruling-class party’s lead candidates take the opposite tack, portraying
themselves as the font of progressive values.
In their first nationally televised debate, all five of the original Democratic
Party contenders, led by “socialist” Bernie Sanders and matched by Hillary
Clinton, enthusiastically decried the “casino capitalism” of Wall Street.
Their purported vision of the future society is one in which the U.S.
“returns” to the moral values of its much fantasized “small business”
and “hard-working little man” roots, where prosperity awaits all who
conscientiously put in the effort. References to America’s slave-labor and
robber-baron origins are absent in this scenario.
Given President Obama’s significantly declining poll ratings, none of the
present Democratic Party contenders sought his overt political support. “Mums
the word” with regard to Obama’s record of leading the nation in implementing
each and every corporate assault against unions, workers, and the poor. None
chose to identify with Obama’s unprecedented corporate largess in the form of
multi-trillion-dollar bailouts to the richest sectors of the U.S. ruling class.
Rhetoric aside, Sanders’ Democratic Party voting record stands at 98 percent,
while Hillary Clinton’s financial support from corporate America’s giants, as
with Obama before her and Bill Clinton earlier, topped all contributions to her
Republican opponents.
We might add that former Secretary of State Clinton backed to the hilt every
imperialist war effort of the Obama administration from Iraq, Afghanistan, and
Libya to today’s U.S. war efforts in Syria. Obama’s countless covert and drone
wars abroad murdered millions while stuffing the coffers of the
military-industrial complex at home. But virtually no comment from Bernie or
Hillary!
Meanwhile, Obama’s hard-working “legacy” promoters struggle today to posture
the president as a keen environmental advocate, an ally of immigrant
communities, a champion of health care for all, a friend of the working class,
a champion of democratic rights, and a man who is reluctant to send more troops
to fight in the interests of U.S. imperialism.
Obama has become the media-promoted rational champion of climate science,
currently partaking in the UN-sponsored Paris talks as the chief “defender” of
the earth against the ravages of global warming.
Yet, Obama’s administration holds the modern-day record for increasing the use
of fossil fuels, opening the floodgates to corporate off-shore drilling, and
maintaining the obnoxiously high government tax breaks for the leading Big Oil
polluters.
Obama’s recent squelching of the infamous Keystone XL pipeline provided his
administration a momentary fig leaf of credibility that immediately vanishes
when contrasted to the massive increase of environmentally destructive pipeline
complexes in place or under construction across the country.
Obama, the “Great Deporter,” with a record two million immigrants brutally
forced out of the country to his credit, gifted $13 trillion in bailouts over
the past seven years to the corporate elite. He presided over the wholesale
shredding of civil liberties (as so ably exposed by the Snowden revelations).
His signature “affordable” health care legislation gifted $3 trillion over the
next 10 years to the private and largely monopolized insurance, hospital, and
pharmaceutical industries—as opposed to a single-payer alternative that would
have saved $1 trillion in government expenditures over the same period.
A Dec. 5 New York Times article entitled, “Jobs Report Seen as Strong Enough
for Fed Action” [to raise interest rates on today’s nearly zero-rate “loans” to
corporate America] nevertheless revealed some bitter truths about the Obama
administration’s seven-year record.
“At 62.5 percent,” The Times notes, “the proportion of Americans in the labor
force remains near mid-decade lows. The jobless rate for African-Americans rose
by 0.2 percentage points in November to 9.4 percent, which is more than twice
the 4.3 percent for white Americans.”
“Moreover, The Times adds, “the economy is still 2.8 million jobs short of
where it would have to be to match pre-recession employment levels while also
absorbing new entrants into the workforce. … Even if the current trend
continues, that so-called ‘jobs gap’ will not be closed until mid-2017.”
Another Dec. 5 New York Times article, “Lawmakers Near Deal on Billions in Tax
Cuts,” notes that the upcoming bipartisan tax-cut legislation, in almost all
cases written behind the scenes and negotiated secretly by the technocrat
specialists of the corporate elite, amounts to nothing less than a five-year
duration transfer of $840 billion from us to them—from tax-paying working
people to the tax-avoiding richest portion of the one percent that really rules
America.
A general shift to the right
Today’s political/electoral drama, almost always devoid of the crooked
corporate machinations that lead to tax cuts and other perks for the
super-wealthy, can best be summarized: “The Republicans talk the talk:
the Democrats walk the walk.”
The silky and “progressive”-sounding Democratic Party election-time jargon is
no accident or fluke. It is consciously designed to pose this wing of the
ruling class as the “civilized” representatives of an egalitarian society that
respects, if not cherishes, democratic and human rights and economic fairness.
Similarly, the Republicans’ election posturing as a racist nut-case party of
almost deranged hate-mongers, climate deniers, and war hawks is not without its
own logic. The extreme verbal political divergence between Democrats and
Republicans lays the foundation for capitalism’s well-honed election-time
lesser-evil scenario, wherein alienated voters who would more than likely
abandon the two-party shell game—a 60 percent majority favor a new third party,
according to a recent Gallup poll—feel compelled to once again allow themselves
to partake in “choosing”
capitalism’s preferred horse in the race.
The seeming Republican Party scapegoating mania combines well with a
generalized disgust with “establishment” politics, and it allows Democrats to
move ever further to the right. Few doubt that President Obama and his
Democratic Party political, social, and economic policies are far to the right
of the most “evil” Republican propositions of yesteryear.
This generalized shift to the right of ruling-class politics, and the
associated feigned public disputes, never fail to reach resolution in the
hidden congressional and corporate corridors, where “compromise”
solutions, always at the expense of the vast majority, are routinely arrived at.
The chaotic and crisis-ridden capitalist system itself—in a crisis virtually
equal in magnitude to that of the Great Depression of 1929—best accounts for
today’s public partisan discord. Different wings of the ruling elite are today
at odds with regard to how much, how fast, and with what means—mass repression
or “friendly” persuasion—to most effectively advance their common corporate
interests.
Sanders pledges to support any Democrat
It is in this context, where massive disillusionment with and alienation from
“traditional” capitalist parties and politics has reached new heights, that one
can also understand the rise of long-time registered “independent,” now
“socialist,” Bernie Sanders, as well as the racist social dissident, Donald
Trump.
Bernie Sanders is now an official Democrat, having pledged in advance to
support whoever of his party competitors emerges from the upcoming election
primary contests as the winner. In some recent polls in the early primary
states, like New Hampshire and Iowa, Sanders’ ranking appears to be in the
political ballpark—that is, he could win.
It was perhaps some 50-60 years ago, when I first encountered the “lesser evil”
dichotomy at work—Kennedy vs. Nixon and Johnson (LBJ) vs.
Barry Goldwater—that I half seriously predicted that the time would come when
the ruling-class elite, when it believed it was necessary to head off a likely
working-class move toward a break with the capitalist two-party duopoly, would
run a “socialist” for president, under the Democratic Party imprimatur, of
course.
That day has arrived, with “Bernie” filling the bill almost perfectly as
today’s central sheepherder of the unwary back into the Democratic Party fold.
Sanders’ service record on capitalism’s behalf falls well within the boundaries
of ruling-class politics. He supported the Obama administration’s wars in
Afghanistan, Libya, Pakistan, Somalia, and Yemen—although he, like most other
liberals who feigned opposition to the Iraq War, including Obama, now claim
that this war was a ”mistake.”
The Saddam Hussein government after all, they have been compelled to
admit, never had “weapons of mass destruction.” The U.S. slaughter
of
1.5 million Iraqis, we are told with a straight face, was a mistake!
“Socialist” Sanders gave his assent to countless trillion-dollar military
appropriations bills, including all congressional measures that supported
Israel in its genocidal drive to eliminate any Palestinian presence in their
historic homeland.
Thus, campaigning for and organizing mass forces to demand the immediate and
unconditional withdrawal of all U.S. troops from every nation on earth is not
within the Sanders campaign’s calculated political territory. He knows full
well that any real socialist would view U.S.
imperialism’s wars everywhere as nothing less than the extension and embodiment
of U.S. ruling-class policies at home.
Sanders has indeed disappointed some of his liberal and even “socialist”
supporters today due to his perceived “weakness” on foreign-policy issues and
his failure to unequivocally challenge and condemn the ever-increasing
brutality and police murder of unarmed Blacks. When confronted with a Black
Lives Matter representative who jumped onto the stage demanding to know where
Sanders stood on America’s deepening racist attacks, the “political
revolutionary” was speechless and quickly exited, leaving the audience stunned.
When he was soon afterward advised that his well-crafted liberal image had to
include a modicum of support to Black rights, he meekly assented, but only to
the point of not significantly interfering with Clinton’s prior turf “claim” to
the Black vote.
Sanders has also made clear that he is not the kind of socialist that seeks the
social ownership of the nation’s wealth and the establishment of a
revolutionary state that once and for all places society’s means of production
and wealth in the hands of and under the democratic control of those who
produce it, in the framework of a government of the working class and its
allies. Sanders’ “socialism,” he insists, includes respect for private
property—operating, perhaps, in a bit more humanely manner.
In short, Sanders, like his “socialist” counterparts in France or in the
Scandinavian countries, seeks a “kinder gentler capitalism.” The fact that he
seeks to emulate Europe’s historically bankrupt social-democratic capitalist
model while these nations are engaged in supporting all of NATO’s wars and
imposing the same, if not worse, austerity measures against their respective
working masses is not unexpected.
In these troubled times “Bernie,” in fact, perfectly fills capitalism’s needs
for legitimacy. His chatter about the need for a “political revolution” in the
U.S. is subordinate to his quarter-century service as Vermont’s leading elected
official—unchallenged by the Democratic Party.
His current assignment, for which he will undoubtedly be richly rewarded down
the line, is to corral working-class discontent back into the capitalist
framework and, when the Peter Pan fairy dust has cleared, to back Hillary
Clinton.
Santa is in exile!
There is no Santa Claus on Wall Street, dear friends—neither in the form of
Bernie and Hillary nor charitable gift-giving billionaires like Gates and
Zuckerberg. Indeed, the real Santa likely abandoned his North Pole abode at the
first signs of Industrial Revolution capitalist-caused global warming.
That once pristine ice-capped area, increasingly barren today, is the domain of
happy Obama’s helpers, including the Chevron Corporation, which seeks to mine
the exposed earth for the very fossil fuels whose continued use spells doom for
all human kind. The real Santa likely moved his helpers to cities around the
world to join the fight to restore his homeland and ours, and to return to the
people of the earth the opportunity to collectively build a joyous world, free
from those who would irrationally destroy it in the pursuit of profit.
Another Christmastime hero, a young Jewish rebel who lived a bit more than 2000
years ago, may have left us with some insightful words to ponder. “Drive the
money changers from the temple,” he exhorted. Not a bad holiday admonition!
Indeed, the socialist movement of the early 19th century did include followers
of Jesus, who believed that socialism was the modern-day expression of the
teachings of the Lord.
Today’s Marxist revolutionaries base themselves on a qualitatively grounded or
materialist understanding of the roots of capitalist society’s countless
horrors. As the gap narrows between workers’
mounting hatred of the dread consequences of capitalist exploitation and
oppression and their reluctance to enter the fray to challenge it in all its
fundamentals, we will see countless millions of new and clear-sighted fighters
break with all of capitalism’s ruling-class-based institutions of coercion and
control.
That day is not far over the horizon. Today, the conscious organization of a
deeply-rooted mass revolutionary socialist party—aimed at ending capitalist
rule forever and bringing forth a new world dedicated to advancing the finest
yearnings for freedom, justice, and equality—is Socialist Action’s reason for
being. Join us!
Share this:
Tumblr
Posted in Elections. | Tagged Clinton, Democratic Party, Republicans, Sanders,
Tea Party, Trump.
Get Involved
Join Socialist Action
Donate to help support our work
Get email updates
Events
Subscribe to Our Newspaper
JAN. 2014 p.1 jpegJAN. 2014 p. 12
Subscribe Today
Subscriptions to the monthly print edition of Socialist Action are
available for the following rates:
- 12 month subscription for $20
- 24 month subscription for $37
- 6 month subscription for $10
Learn More
Email Updates
Enter your email address to subscribe to our free e-mail Socialist
Action Newsletter. Also to receive notifcations of new web posts by email.
Learn More
Newspaper Archives
Newspaper Archives Select Month December 2015 (4) November 2015 (9)
October 2015 (8) September 2015 (10) August 2015 (7) July 2015
(13) June 2015 (9) May 2015 (10) April 2015 (12) March 2015 (9)
February
2015 (11) January 2015 (10) December 2014 (12) November 2014
(11) October 2014 (9) September 2014 (6) August 2014 (10) July
2014
(11) June 2014 (10) May 2014 (11) April 2014 (10) March 2014 (9)
February
2014 (11) January 2014 (11) December 2013 (10) November 2013
(11) October 2013 (17) September 2013 (13) August 2013 (10) July
2013
(11) June 2013 (15) May 2013 (14) April 2013 (14) March 2013
(12) February 2013 (10) January 2013 (17) December 2012 (7)
November
2012
(8) October 2012 (19) September 2012 (2) August 2012 (27) July
2012
(18) June 2012 (3) May 2012 (19) April 2012 (14) March 2012 (17)
February 2012 (19) January 2012 (17) December 2011 (3) November
2011
(33) October 2011 (14) September 2011 (13) August 2011 (34) July
2011 (24) June 2011 (19) May 2011 (19) April 2011 (15) March
2011
(15) February 2011 (16) January 2011 (15) December 2010 (17)
November 2010 (1) October 2010 (6) September 2010 (3) August 2010
(8) July 2010 (7) June 2010 (2) May 2010 (9) April 2010 (3)
March 2010 (8) February 2010 (3) January 2010 (9) December 2009
(6) November 2009
(5) October 2009 (16) September 2009 (3) August 2009 (2) July
2009
(5) June 2009 (2) May 2009 (7) April 2009 (6) March 2009 (16)
February 2009 (9) January 2009 (10) December 2008 (11) November
2008
(8) October 2008 (16) September 2008 (14) August 2008 (18) July
2008
(12) June 2008 (3) May 2008 (2) April 2008 (3) March 2008 (14)
February 2008 (11) January 2008 (11) December 2007 (8) November
2007
(1) July 2007 (1) June 2007 (1) April 2007 (1) March 2007 (1)
February 2007 (3) December 2006 (11) November 2006 (11) October
2006
(13) September 2006 (15) August 2006 (11) July 2006 (12) June
2006
(7) May 2006 (14) April 2006 (6) March 2006 (14) February 2006
(5) January 2006 (2) December 2005 (9) November 2005 (8) October
2005
(13) September 2005 (12) August 2005 (9) July 2005 (16) June 2005
(16) May 2005 (16) April 2005 (12) March 2005 (14) February 2005
(19) January 2005 (15) December 2004 (14) November 2002 (17)
October
2002 (19) September 2002 (22) August 2002 (21) July 2002 (15)
May
2002 (21) April 2002 (21) February 2002 (15) January 2002 (15)
December 2001 (17) October 2001 (24) September 2001 (18) July
2001
(19) June 2001 (18) October 2000 (17) September 2000 (21) August
2000 (19) July 2000 (16) June 2000 (26) May 2000 (21) April 2000
(22) March 2000 (28) February 2000 (18) January 2000 (20) December
1999 (20) November 1999 (26) October 1999 (25) September 1999
(18) August 1999 (40) July 1999 (38) June 1999 (24) May 1999 (27)
April
1999 (25) March 1999 (26) February 1999 (29) January 1999 (24)
July
1998 (12) 0 (2)
Learn More
Pamphlets/Books
Socialist Action publishes a wide variety of pamphlets on burning
issues of today such as global warming, women’s liberation, the
Middle East and other subjects.
Learn More
Socialist Action (U.S.): socialistaction@xxxxxxx | (510) 268-9429
Socialist Action / Ligue pour l’Action socialiste (Canada):
barryaw@xxxxxxxxxx
Copyright © 2015 Socialist Action. All Rights Reserved. Site Design
by Lucid Digital Designs | Site Utilities
