Miriam,
You are absolutely correct.
The next 3 plus months will be taken straight from the same worn out
old play book. Trash talk, negativity, and tooting the Hillary Horn
will beat TV viewers into the ground, while telling them nothing of
any meaning.
Even Thom Hartman is wearing a bit thin. All I have left is Amy and
Juan, and Alternative Radio for my "news".
That is, in addition to the posts here on blind democracy.
Carl Jarvis
On 7/30/16, Miriam Vieni <miriamvieni@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Carl,
She's done as much of that as she's going to do. Now she'll move back to
the
right to find all of the Republicans who don't want to vote for Trump and
the moderate independents. The DNC figures that the progressive Democrats
are already captive. They have to vote for Hillary regardless of what she
says, in order to keep Trump from becoming President. This is their
playbook. Regardless of who the Republican candidate is, he's bound to
sound
terrible to Progressives and besides, there are always those Supreme Court
appointments. The Democratic Party uses the same reasoning every time and
it
usually works, except when the Republicans canphysically steal the votes
like in 2000 and 2004.
Miriam
-----Original Message-----
From: blind-democracy-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:blind-democracy-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Carl Jarvis
Sent: Saturday, July 30, 2016 3:30 PM
To: blind-democracy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: Miriam Vieni
Subject: [blind-democracy] Re: You Go to War With the Hillary Clinton You
Have
So once again it comes down to a vote for the lessor fo two evils. If we
are to prevail over Donald Trump, it is Hillary Clinton.
It would be so refreshing to have a presidential campaign in which at least
one of the candidates moved to higher ground and showcased positive plans
for rebuilding the many social programs that have been falling into
neglect.
Instead of being told that a Donald Trump presidency would be the worst
thing to ever befall Americans, why not give voters some positive stuff as
an enticement to back Clinton. How about it, Hillary? Can you outline the
steps you will take to bring about the increase of a national wage minimum
of at least $15 per hour?
What plan do you have, and how can we support your efforts in removing
student debts and bringing about "free" education for All students?
How can we work together to bring an end to private prisons and the "inmate
slave labor" that is lining the pockets of Privateers?
What are your plans, and how can we become involved in rebuilding our
public
education, including the building of quality facilities?
What are you planning to do, and where do we come in, to create a Green
environment, bringing to an end the death grip of the Oil Cartel.
See what I mean, Hillary? The list is endless, thanks to the neglect over
the last 36 years. You could put together the most positive campaign,
never
having to sound as if you are talking down to us, telling us over and over
just how horrible Donald Trump would be.
Carl Jarvis
On 7/29/16, S. Kashdan <skashdan@xxxxxxx> wrote:
You Go to War With the Hillary Clinton You Havelady."
She may not be an inspirational candidate, but her job now is to
persuade voters that she's the last best hope against Trump.
By David Corn
Mother Jones, Friday, July 29, 2016 12:15 AM EDT
http://www.motherjones.com/print/310376
Hillary Clinton's convention message: She's good enough to beat Trump
She may not be an inspirational candidate, but her job now is to
persuade voters she's the last best hope against the mogul.
When Bill Clinton spoke to the Democratic convention on Tuesday night,
he warmly recalled the time in 1985 when Hillary Clinton learned about
a preschool program in Israel that taught low-income mothers how to
become the
first teachers for their children and then introduced it in Arkansas.
When Joe Biden was at the podium, he declared, "Hillary understood
that for years, millions of people went to bed staring at the ceiling
thinking, 'Oh my God, what if I get breast cancer or he has a heart
attack? I will lose everything. What will we do then?'"
Tim Kaine on Wednesday night pointed out that Clinton had fought "to
get health insurance for 8 million low-income children when she was first
get a quality education."
He added, "When you want to know something about the character of
somebody in public life, look to see if they have a passion that began
long before they were in office, and that they have consistently held
it throughout their career." And President Barack Obama, in a
rip-roaring stem-winder, asserted, "Hillary's still got the tenacity
that she had as a young woman working at the Children's Defense Fund,
going door to door to ultimately make sure kids with disabilities could
Sanders'
With Hillary Clinton's disapproval ratings nearly as high as Donald
Trump's
record-setting numbers, the message of the Democratic gathering in
Philadelphia this week has been simple: She is better than you think,
whether you're a Republican predisposed to dislike a Democrat but now
concerned about Donald Trump or a Bernie Sanders supporter who views
Hillary
Clinton as the flag carrier for a corrupt corporatist elite. Bill
Clinton even acknowledged that his wife, thanks to her detractors, has
become a "cartoon" for many. He added, "Cartoons are two-dimensional.
They're easy to
absorb. Life in the world is complicated."
And so is Hillary Clinton. She is a onetime former McGovern Democrat
who voted to let George W. Bush launch the Iraq War. She did help
create a health insurance program for millions of low-income children
in the 1990s but also supported welfare reform that progressive social
policy experts decried. She has denounced big-money politics and
called for overturning Citizens United but pocketed personal and
campaign funds from Goldman Sachs
and other Wall Street interests. She has resolutely stood up to false
charges from her say-anything foes regarding the tragic Benghazi
attack, but
she did screw up with the emails. She can be highly competent and also
possess tremendous blind spots. She knows policy and campaigns awkwardly.
The Clinton White House years were marked by her unsuccessful but
well-intentioned effort to achieve national health insurance, her
husband's
fight to beat back draconian GOP cuts in Medicare, Medicaid,
environmental and education funding, and assorted controversies, some
real (her cattle futures trading, last-minute pardons, the Lewinsky
affair) and some trumped
up (Travelgate, Filegate, Vince Foster's death). She has long
supported progressive causes (abortion rights, affordable child care,
LGBT rights, family leave, immigration reform, women's rights, gun
safety, climate
change) but was a partner in her husband's ideological triangulation
and, more recently, has been less than steady in opposing the proposed
TPP trade
deal. It's no wonder that one leitmotif of the Dems' week in
Philadelphia was the difficulty many Sanders delegates have coming to
terms with Clinton
as the Democratic nominee.
As the convention managers and leaders of the Clinton campaign pushed
a message of party unity in celebration of the first woman to win a
major party's nomination--and Sen. Bernie Sanders joined in by
declaring in his prime-time speech that it was essential to support
Clinton and that she would make an "outstanding" president--a large
chunk of Sanders delegates noted they were not ready for her. Though
the Sanders campaign had achieved
so much more than past within-the-party insurgencies (Jesse Jackson in
1984
and 1988, Jerry Brown in 1992) by winning significant victories during
the party platform and rules deliberations, many Sanders delegates
during the week focused on grievances and slights: the leaked
Democratic National Committee emails that showed (no shocker) that
some Democratic staffers were
not Sanders fans; the Clinton campaign's embrace of Debbie Wasserman
Schultz
after she resigned as party chairman; the convention managers
preventing [1]
a prominent Sanders supporter from speaking from the stage. Rather
than celebrate their triumphs, many Sanders delegates groused
repeatedly that the
Clinton campaign had not reached out to them. They openly rejected
how the process was conducted,"
instruction to refrain from protests during the convention proceedings
and to embrace Clinton in the crusade against Trump.
Throughout the week, numerous Sanders delegates said, "I'm not there
yet."
They insisted it was still up to Clinton, whom some dismissed as a
"neoliberal hawk" and phony progressive, to win them over and to
convince them she would stick to her opposition to the TPP (the policy
issue that most engaged Sanders delegates). They voiced disappointment
that Clinton had
not adopted the Sanders position on fracking, single-payer Medicare
for all,
and Middle East policy.
Norman Solomon, a Sanders delegate and coordinator of the Bernie
Delegates Network (which is not affiliated with the Sanders campaign),
complained that
the convention was full of "cheerleading for war." Chuck Pennacchio, a
Sanders delegate from Pennsylvania, warned that Sanders delegates were
not content to "hand the ball" to Clinton. He added, "Clinton and her
surrogates
need to get out in the field and say [to Sanders supporters], 'I
really want
to hear you.' And that has not happened." He griped, "When I talk to
the Hillary people, they say, 'Get over yourself.'"
Older Sanders delegates routinely noted that the millennials who had
boarded
the Bernie Express as volunteers and delegates needed more time to
process their defeat and that they had to be courted by Clinton. A
senior Sanders strategist insisted that Clinton had to accept the
responsibility of engaging with this group via texts, tweets, and
videos. "There is a lot of mistrust among our young Bernie voters about
policies."
said Donna Smith, the executive director of Progressive Democrats of
America
and a Sanders advocate. "To think young people would make a pivot in
four days is not very realistic...It is not a given that people will
hold their nose and vote for her." On the last night, many
not-there-yet Sanders delegates attended the convention wearing yellow
T-shirts emblazoned with the slogan "Enough is enough."
It was unclear how many Sanders backers were in such a dark place. Ten
percent? Half? More? It did seem that some of the independent
senator's supporters would never accept Clinton and that despite
Sanders own statements many of his ardent followers had not absorbed
the message that their insurgency had racked up impressive gains.
After listening to several
Sanders delegates say that Clinton was not addressing their concerns,
Tony Russomanno, a Clinton delegate from California, wondered if the
Sanders die-hards could ever be satisfied and deal with the reality
that Clinton had
won the nomination. Sanders "people are conflating being listened to
to getting their own way," he said with a sigh.
Whether or not energizing Sanders-ites is a top priority for the
Clinton camp--and it's open to debate whether it's more important for
her to excite
the progressive base or to draw in moderates (or to do both) in order
to bag
the few swing states necessary for victory--she did reach out to
independents and Republicans. Throughout the convention, speakers and
videos
made the case to moderate Rs and independents (see Michael Bloomberg's
speech [2]) that in a world where Trump could end up in the White
House and
in command of nuclear weapons, Clinton is a just fine if not perfect
alternative.
With her acceptance speech, Clinton sought to depict herself as an
advocate
of compromise, steady leadership, and across-the-aisle conversation.
She came across as a workhorse. She noted, "I sweat the details of
The level of lead in drinking water. The cost of prescription drugs.weapons."
The number of mental health facilities in a state. She confessed she
might not be the best politician: "The service part has always come
easier to me than
the public part...I get it: Some people don't know what to make of
me." And
she went the Full Bernie, declaring she was prepared to collaborate
with the
Sanders crowd to advance the "progressive" platform the two campaigns
developed together. Addressing Sanders supporters, she declared, "I
heard you. Your cause is our cause." She touched all the Sanders
issues: economic
inequality, big-money corruption, Wall Street greed, climate change,
unfair
trade deals, expanding Social Security, tuition-free college, and
more. It was an outright play for their support.
Clinton slyly slammed Trump, casting him as the candidate of fear,
division,
and insult. She poked at his habit of stiffing small-business
contractors.
"Donald Trump says he wants to make America great again," she jabbed.
"He could start by actually making things in America." She zeroed in
on his
temperament: "Imagine him in the Oval Office, facing a real crisis...A
man you can bait with a tweet is not a man you can trust with nuclear
for her, so be it.
Her overall theme was "stronger together." And she is trying to build
a non-Trump coalition that stretches from Sanders progressives to
Reaganesque
Republicans who fear Trump. She juxtaposed her desire for communal
politics
with Trump's politics of the ego. It was an effective speech, and
Clinton succeeded in illustrating the stark choice this presidential
election presents.
Within the convention hall, there were plenty of Democrats excited to
be led
by Clinton, inspired by her work and stances over the years, and
thrilled by
the historic nature of the moment. But for many Democrats,
progressives, independents, and GOPers horrified at the prospect of a
bullying, bigoted, and erratic celebrity tycoon becoming
president--and perhaps not fully enthused by Clinton--Clinton has to
sell herself as the best option available. Hours before her speech,
Robby Mook, the Clinton campaign manager, acknowledged that some
voters are "skeptical" of Clinton and noted
that she must show them her "core values and core motivations and her
lifetime of work." In a way, her task in the next three months is to
show those skeptical voters, in the words of Stuart Smalley, the Al
Franken SNL character, "I'm good enough, I'm smart enough, and doggone
it, people like me." And if some voters feel they are settling by voting
candidate.
Clinton has spent decades in public life, and there won't be a new
Hillary in the weeks ahead. She is unlikely to become an inspirational
She is unlikely to lower dramatically her approval ratings. She won't
become
a progressive hero. She won't become trusted by Republicans who have
long eyed the Clintons with suspicion. She is, though, the only chance
to stop Trump's takeover of America--and her job is to persuade voters
that for now
she is indeed the last best hope.
Source URL:
http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2016/07/hillary-clinton-dnc-speech
-message
Links:
[1]
http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2016/07/bernie-sanders-delegates-c
onvention-protest-walk-out
[2]
http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2016/07/michael-bloomberg-democrat
s-found-perfect-foil-donald-trump
