https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2016/04/16/pers-a16.html
Where’s the socialism in the Sanders campaign?
16 April 2016
In the campaign for the 1984 Democratic presidential nomination, Walter
Mondale, citing a then-popular advertising tagline, reproached his chief
rival Gary Hart for empty platitudes and lack of substance, asking him
repeatedly, “Where’s the beef?” In the 2016 campaign, a similarly blunt
question could be posed to Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders: “Where’s the
socialism?”
Sanders rocketed to prominence last summer as a self-proclaimed
“democratic socialist,” striking a pose of intransigent opposition to
Wall Street and the domination of American politics by the “millionaires
and billionaires.” He has capitalized on the growing popularity of
socialism among millions of students and younger workers, winning more
than 7.5 million votes and posing a substantial challenge to the
Democratic frontrunner, former secretary of state Hillary Clinton.
His identification with socialism has been critical to Sanders winning
support among the younger generation of working people, who have seen
capitalism produce nothing but economic decay, financial crisis and
never-ending war. One recent poll showed that voters under 30 preferred
socialism to capitalism by a sizeable margin, 43 percent to 32 percent,
despite the nonstop media demonization of socialism.
But aside from the label, which Sanders now rarely uses, his “socialism”
is invisible. He has not called for a single industry to be placed under
public ownership and democratic control—not the oil companies, not the
arms manufacturers, not the utilities, not the Wall Street banks that
plunged the US and world economy into the deepest economic crisis since
the Great Depression.
The completely vacuous character of Sanders’ “socialism” was on display
in his debate Thursday night in Brooklyn with Hillary Clinton, when
Sanders was questioned about his call to break up the biggest US banks,
bailed out by the federal government in the 2008-2009 Wall Street
crisis. CNN journalist Dana Bash asked why he proposed to let the banks
themselves decide how the breakup would proceed:
Sanders: The point is we have got to break them up so that they do not
pose a systemic risk and so that we have a vibrant economy with a
competitive financial system.
Bash: But Senator, you didn’t answer the specific question, which is not
just about breaking up the banks, but why allow the banks to do it
themselves?
Sanders: Because I’m not sure—what the government should say is you are
too big to fail. You’ve got to be a certain size. And then the banks
themselves can figure out what they want to sell off. I don’t know that
it’s appropriate that the Department of Treasury be making those decisions.
There is nothing at all radical here. Sanders argues like a free-market
conservative, declaring it isn’t “appropriate” for the government to
make decisions about the sell-off of bank assets. And this after
repeatedly declaring that “the business model of Wall Street is fraud.”
Apparently, the fraudsters can continue their operations unhindered,
just on a somewhat smaller scale.
Sanders’s proposal to break up the major Wall Street banks, is not, as
the WSWS has explained, a socialist measure. He does not propose placing
the banking system under public ownership and democratic control, so
that the resources of society can be used for human need and not the
accumulation of personal wealth by a financial aristocracy. Instead, he
advocates maintaining the private ownership of the banks, only dividing
them into smaller units to create what he called in the debate “a
competitive financial system.”
His call to downsize the biggest banks is, in fact, the position of a
faction within the ruling class and the financial bureaucracy itself.
The Minneapolis Federal Reserve Bank and its president, Neel Kashkari,
are holding public symposiums promoting the proposal. Kashkari, a former
Goldman Sachs banker and Treasury official in the Bush administration,
was the administrator of the $700 billion Troubled Asset Relief Program
bank bailout.
In his only public address devoted to the question of socialism, last
November 19 at Georgetown University, Sanders presented his policies as
an extension of Franklin D. Roosevelt’s New Deal and Lyndon Johnson’s
Great Society, both efforts at liberal reform to save capitalism, not
put an end to it. He declared categorically, “I don’t believe government
should own the means of production… I believe in private companies that
thrive and invest and grow in America.”
The policies Sanders advocates on jobs, health care, education and the
like would not have been out of place in the Democratic Party of the
1960s, and are far less radical than those proposed by the Populists of
the 1890s and the Progressive and Farmer-Labor parties of the early 20th
century, which called for public ownership of the railroads and
utilities, and the breaking up of corporate monopolies.
What Sanders is proposing now for Wall Street—a self-directed
breakup—has a noxious historical precedent: the breakup of the
telecommunications industry in 1984. Under government prodding, the
telephone monopoly AT&T broke itself up into seven component parts,
initiating a process of deregulation, asset-stripping and mergers that
has produced an unmitigated disaster for the workers of that industry,
as demonstrated by the current strike by telecommunications workers at
Verizon.
Sanders made an appearance on the Verizon picket line and has been
endorsed by the leadership of the Communication Workers of America, the
union that has sold out strike after strike and is preparing a similar
fate for the current struggle. A socialist would raise the demand that
Verizon and the other telecommunications companies be nationalized under
the democratic control of the workers. But Sanders is not a socialist.
Toward the end of the Brooklyn debate, Sanders boasted that he had
brought millions of new voters, both independents and young people, into
the Democratic Party. “I am proud that millions of young people who
previously were not involved in the political process are now coming
into it,” he said, “and I do believe that we have got to open the door
of the Democratic Party to those people.”
Sanders is like the rooster who thinks his crowing causes the sun to
rise. Millions of workers and youth are moving to the left, not because
of the senator from Vermont, who is a temporary and undeserving
beneficiary of this process, but because of the crisis and breakdown of
American and world capitalism.
While Sanders seeks to keep this movement trapped within the
straitjacket of the Democratic Party and offers his “socialist” persona
and anti-Wall Street rhetoric as a means of doing so, it would be wrong
to confuse the aspirations of those supporting him with the calculations
of the senator himself. There is an objective logic to politics. The
support for Sanders is only a transitional stage in a political
radicalization that is placing mass struggles against the capitalist
system on the agenda in the United States.
What is needed is the building of a new political leadership among
workers and youth that can explain what socialism is, why it is
necessary, and how it is to be achieved. That is the task the Socialist
Equality Party will undertake in the course of the 2016 elections and
beyond.
Patrick Martin
The author also recommends:
The message of Wisconsin
[7 April 2016]
Is Sanders’ call to “break up the banks” a socialist demand?
[12 April 2016]
Share this article:
Facebook
Twitter
Digg
Reddit
Delicious
StumbleUpon
Blogger
E-Mail
Commenting Discussion Rules »
New Today
US defence secretary sends menacing message to China
Where’s the socialism in the Sanders campaign?
Australian prime minister skirts controversy in China
UK Brexit referendum campaigns officially begin
Tensions mount as Verizon strike continues
more articles »
Perspectives
Where’s the socialism in the Sanders campaign?
Zika, social inequality and capitalism
The political issues in the Verizon strike
The social reality behind the US elections
Kerry in Hiroshima
more articles »
US Politics
Where’s the socialism in the Sanders campaign?
Financial crisis panel urged Obama administration to prosecute top bankers
US elections: Republican crisis deepens over prospect of contested
convention
Sanders campaigns in Syracuse, New York
Is Sanders’ call to “break up the banks” a socialist demand?
more articles »
Mehring Books
In Defense of Leon Trotsky (second edition)
undefined
By David North
Get Involved!
Donate to the WSWS
About the ICFI
Join the IYSSE
Join the SEP
Socialist Equality Parties United States Germany Australia United
Kingdom Sri Lanka Canada
Follow the WSWS
Facebook
Twitter
Youtube
RSS Feed
Daily Podcast
WSWS Newsletter
The Political Lessons of Syriza’s Betrayal in Greece
Socialism and the Struggle Against War
The political struggle against war and the tasks of the Socialist
Equality Party (Sri Lanka)
The IYSSE’s campaign against war and historical falsification at
Humboldt University
The return of German militarism and the tasks of the Partei für Soziale
Gleichheit
The Fight Against War and the Political Tasks of the Socialist Equality
Party
Capitalist breakdown and the drive to war
Seventy-five years since the outbreak of World War II
Oppose the Israeli invasion of Gaza
Who is responsible for the catastrophes in the Middle East?
One hundred years since Sarajevo
Australian imperialism and the Obama administration’s “pivot to Asia”
Does Washington want war with Russia?
More on imperialism and war »
Seventy-five years since the assassination of Leon Trotsky
Why and how the GPU murdered Trotsky
--An interview with David North
Socialism and historical truth
--A lecture delivered by David North at the Leipzig Book Fair
The IYSSE’s campaign against war and historical falsification at
Humboldt University
Berlin IYSSE protests Professor Jörg Baberowski’s suppression of
democratic discussion at Humboldt University
Appearance of Robert Service in Berlin ends in fiasco
The philosophical and political foundations of historical falsification
Leon Trotsky and the defense of historical truth
Lecture by David North
More on Leon Trotsky and the defense of historical truth »
SEP/ICFI
Four-part series from Sri Lanka: The LSSP’s Great Betrayal
Resolutions of the SEP (US) Third National Congress
2014 International May Day Rally
Resolutions of the Second National Congress of the SEP (US)
Socialist Equality Party (Australia) holds Second National Congress
The Historical and International Foundations of the Socialist Equality
Party (Sri Lanka)
Socialist Equality Party (UK) holds First National Congress
The Historical and International Foundations of the Socialist Equality
Party (Britain)
The Historical Fondations of the Partei für Soziale Gleichheit (SEP Germany)
Report to the Second National Congress of the Socialist Equality Party
by David North
more ICFI documents »
Fund
DVD
Lectures and Reports
A tribute to Dave Hyland
US imperialism and the proxy war in Syria
Seventy-five years of the Fourth International
Twenty years since the dissolution of the USSR
The capitalist crisis and the radicalization of the working class in 2012
25 years since Keerthi Balasuriya’s death
South Asia’s foremost Marxist of the second half of the 20th century
by Wije Dias
The enduring significance of the life and work of Comrade Keerthi
Balasuriya
In Memory of Keerthi Balasuriya
by David North
more documents »
.
About the WSWS | Contact Us | Privacy Statement | Top of page
Copyright © 1998-2016 World Socialist Web Site - All rights reserve
