[blind-democracy] Re: What It Means to Be a Socialist

  • From: Miriam Vieni <miriamvieni@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: blind-democracy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2015 21:25:54 -0400

He probably never heard of her. I haven't. Why would anyone vote for a
completely unknown quantity, just a name endorsed by a party? She might not
even be on the ballot in his state. That's my point. You have to be one of
the anointed to know about these people. Wouldn't it be better if all of the
people who were unhappy with the corporate Democrats and had similar views
on needed changes, got together in a really large group and then organized?
And since the Green Party already is able to get their candidate on the
ballot in many states and has more resources and more recognition, why not
all join together in that party? So what if they're not politically correct?
They're close enough at least make a stab at changing things.

Miriam

-----Original Message-----
From: blind-democracy-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:blind-democracy-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Roger Loran
Bailey (Redacted sender "rogerbailey81" for DMARC)
Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 8:03 PM
To: blind-democracy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [blind-democracy] Re: What It Means to Be a Socialist

Have you considered Gloria La Riva?

On 9/22/2015 3:58 PM, Bob Hachey wrote:

Hi Miriam,
All good points. I do wonder though if folks like Sanders and FDR make
it easier for the ruling class to remain in control as Hedges
suggests. No doubt, they've both made life better for lots of low
income folks. If, somehow, sanders is on the final ballot for
president, I still may be tempted to vote for Jill Stein. That may be
a decision made in the voting booth. Let's hope I get to make such a
decision.
Bob





Other related posts: