On 9/6/15, Miriam Vieni <miriamvieni@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Looking back through the Fog of Time, I can't say exactly what it was
Higgins writes: "The ruling is a victory for the coalition that filed the
suit in July 2013, asking a judge to declare the law unconstitutional for
'improperly diverting public-school funds to private organizations that are
not subject to local voter control.'"
Employees of Washington Commercial Painters retouch the interior at the
Summit Sierra charter school in Seattle after hours Friday. After nearly a
year of deliberation, the state Supreme Court ruled late Friday afternoon
that charter schools are not constitutional. (photo: Sy Bean/The Seattle
Times)
Washington State Supreme Court: Charter Schools Are Unconstitutional
By John Higgins, The Seattle Times
06 September 15
After nearly a year of deliberation, the state Supreme Court ruled late
Friday afternoon that charter schools are not constitutional.
After nearly a year of deliberation, the state Supreme Court ruled 6-3 late
Friday afternoon that charter schools are unconstitutional, creating chaos
for hundreds of families whose children have already started classes.
The ruling — believed to be one of the first of its kind in the country —
overturns the law voters narrowly approved in 2012 allowing publicly
funded,
but privately operated, schools.
Eight new charter schools are opening in Washington this fall, in addition
to one that opened in Seattle last year.
It was not immediately known what would happen with the schools that are
already running. The parties have 20 days to ask the court for
reconsideration before the ruling becomes final.
In Seattle, Summit Sierra, a new college-prep high school, opened Aug. 17
in
the Chinatown International District with its inaugural freshman class of
130.
“We will absolutely be here ready for kids on Tuesday,” said Executive
Director Malia Burns.
School also started Aug. 17 at SOAR Academy and Summit: Olympus in Tacoma.
Excel Public Charter School in Kent began Aug. 20, and Destiny Charter
Middle School in Tacoma opened Aug. 24. Rainier Prep’s first day of class
was Tuesday.
PRIDE Prep and Spokane International Academy in the Spokane area opened
last
month.
In the ruling, Chief Justice Barbara Madsen wrote that charter schools
aren’t “common schools” because they’re governed by appointed rather than
elected boards.
Therefore, “money that is dedicated to common schools is unconstitutionally
diverted to charter schools,” Madsen wrote.
Justice Mary E. Fairhurst agreed with the majority that charter schools
aren’t common schools, but argued in a partial dissenting opinion that the
state “can constitutionally support charter schools through the general
fund.”
She was joined by Justices Steven C. González and Sheryl Gordon McCloud.
Charter schools, at a glance
Where are they? Three in the Seattle area, three in Tacoma, two in Spokane.
Are they full? Yes. All eight new charter schools report they have filled
their available seats, usually with lotteries.
How many charter schools would have been allowed in the state? Under the
2012 law, up to 40 new charter schools could have opened in Washington over
a five-year period.
The ruling is a victory for the coalition that filed the suit in July 2013,
asking a judge to declare the law unconstitutional for “improperly
diverting
public-school funds to private organizations that are not subject to local
voter control.”
The Washington Education Association was joined by the League of Women
Voters of Washington, El Centro de la Raza, the Washington Association of
School Administrators and several individual plaintiffs.
“The Supreme Court has affirmed what we’ve said all along — charter schools
steal money from our existing classrooms, and voters have no say in how
these charter schools spend taxpayer funding,” said Kim Mead, president of
the Washington Education Association.
“To tell you the truth, I cried. It’s been a long hard fight,” said Melissa
Westbrook, an education blogger who chaired the campaign opposing the
charter-school law in 2012.
Joshua Halsey, executive director of the state charter-school commission,
criticized the court’s timing.
“The court had this case in front of them since last October and waiting
until students were attending public charter schools to issue their ruling
is unconscionable,” Halsey said. “We are most concerned about the almost
1,000 students and families attending charter schools and making sure they
understand what this ruling means regarding their public-school educational
options.”
The state Attorney General’s Office said attorneys are reviewing the
decision, but had no comment Friday.
David Postman, communications director for Gov. Jay Inslee, said the
governor’s office is reviewing the court’s decision and will consult with
the Attorney General’s Office.
“But until we have a thorough analysis, we can’t say what that means for
schools operating today,” Postman said.
Under the 2012 law, up to 40 new charter schools could have opened in
Washington over a five-year period.
In December 2013, King County Superior Court Judge Jean Rietschel struck
down the part of the law that would have made charter schools eligible for
state construction money, but essentially cleared the way for the state
commission and the Spokane school district to authorize new schools.
Spokane
is the only school district with such authority.
All sides expected the case to reach the Supreme Court, which heard oral
arguments last October.
Washington State Charter School Commission Chair Steve Sundquist said that
commissioners anticipated a range of possible outcomes affecting funding,
but didn’t draw up a plan to deal with a complete reversal.
“We were not expecting a ruling as deeply disappointing as this one,”
Sundquist said.
He said the commission’s lawyer in the Attorney General’s Office will be
meeting Saturday morning with other attorneys to discuss options.
The attorney for the plaintiffs, Paul Lawrence, doesn’t think there’s much
more legal work to do on the issue. But he acknowledged that much has to be
sorted out regarding the nine charter schools that are already up and
running.
“The bottom line is that the initiative is unconstitutional so the charter
schools that were authorized under the charter-school initiative can’t be
publicly funded,” Lawrence said. “If there’s any avenue, it’s going to be
through some act of the Legislature.”
That’s what happened in Georgia.
In 2011, the Georgia Supreme Court struck down a 2008 law that created a
state commission to authorize charter schools, which have been legal in the
state since 1993.
The decision didn’t affect the vast majority of Georgia’s charter schools,
according to the Georgia Charter Schools Association. In 2012, voters
approved a constitutional amendment that reinstated the state commission.
Tom Franta, leader of the Washington State Charter Schools Association
advocacy group, said he was waiting to hear back from the nonprofit’s
attorney to find out what happens next.
“We haven’t had a chance to debrief the opinion with attorneys, with what
does happen next with the schools that are open,” he said.
Rep. Chad Magendanz, R-Issaquah, and ranking member on the House Education
Committee, said he was stunned by the decision.
“I’m shocked. I’m worried about the political aspects about this,”
Magendanz
said. “The court is becoming too much of ‘a political animal,’ ” said
Magendanz, a charter-school supporter.
Error! Hyperlink reference not valid. Error! Hyperlink reference not
valid.
Employees of Washington Commercial Painters retouch the interior at the
Summit Sierra charter school in Seattle after hours Friday. After nearly a
year of deliberation, the state Supreme Court ruled late Friday afternoon
that charter schools are not constitutional. (photo: Sy Bean/The Seattle
Times)
http://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/education/state-supreme-court-chart
er-schools-are-unconstitutional/http://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/edu
cation/state-supreme-court-charter-schools-are-unconstitutional/
Washington State Supreme Court: Charter Schools Are Unconstitutional
By John Higgins, The Seattle Times
06 September 15
After nearly a year of deliberation, the state Supreme Court ruled late
Friday afternoon that charter schools are not constitutional.
fter nearly a year of deliberation, the state Supreme Court ruled 6-3 late
Friday afternoon that charter schools are unconstitutional, creating chaos
for hundreds of families whose children have already started classes.
The ruling — believed to be one of the first of its kind in the country —
overturns the law voters narrowly approved in 2012 allowing publicly
funded,
but privately operated, schools.
Eight new charter schools are opening in Washington this fall, in addition
to one that opened in Seattle last year.
It was not immediately known what would happen with the schools that are
already running. The parties have 20 days to ask the court for
reconsideration before the ruling becomes final.
In Seattle, Summit Sierra, a new college-prep high school, opened Aug. 17
in
the Chinatown International District with its inaugural freshman class of
130.
“We will absolutely be here ready for kids on Tuesday,” said Executive
Director Malia Burns.
School also started Aug. 17 at SOAR Academy and Summit: Olympus in Tacoma.
Excel Public Charter School in Kent began Aug. 20, and Destiny Charter
Middle School in Tacoma opened Aug. 24. Rainier Prep’s first day of class
was Tuesday.
PRIDE Prep and Spokane International Academy in the Spokane area opened
last
month.
In the ruling, Chief Justice Barbara Madsen wrote that charter schools
aren’t “common schools” because they’re governed by appointed rather than
elected boards.
Therefore, “money that is dedicated to common schools is unconstitutionally
diverted to charter schools,” Madsen wrote.
Justice Mary E. Fairhurst agreed with the majority that charter schools
aren’t common schools, but argued in a partial dissenting opinion that the
state “can constitutionally support charter schools through the general
fund.”
She was joined by Justices Steven C. González and Sheryl Gordon McCloud.
Charter schools, at a glance
Where are they? Three in the Seattle area, three in Tacoma, two in Spokane.
Are they full? Yes. All eight new charter schools report they have filled
their available seats, usually with lotteries.
How many charter schools would have been allowed in the state? Under the
2012 law, up to 40 new charter schools could have opened in Washington over
a five-year period.
The ruling is a victory for the coalition that filed the suit in July 2013,
asking a judge to declare the law unconstitutional for “improperly
diverting
public-school funds to private organizations that are not subject to local
voter control.”
The Washington Education Association was joined by the League of Women
Voters of Washington, El Centro de la Raza, the Washington Association of
School Administrators and several individual plaintiffs.
“The Supreme Court has affirmed what we’ve said all along — charter schools
steal money from our existing classrooms, and voters have no say in how
these charter schools spend taxpayer funding,” said Kim Mead, president of
the Washington Education Association.
“To tell you the truth, I cried. It’s been a long hard fight,” said Melissa
Westbrook, an education blogger who chaired the campaign opposing the
charter-school law in 2012.
Joshua Halsey, executive director of the state charter-school commission,
criticized the court’s timing.
“The court had this case in front of them since last October and waiting
until students were attending public charter schools to issue their ruling
is unconscionable,” Halsey said. “We are most concerned about the almost
1,000 students and families attending charter schools and making sure they
understand what this ruling means regarding their public-school educational
options.”
The state Attorney General’s Office said attorneys are reviewing the
decision, but had no comment Friday.
David Postman, communications director for Gov. Jay Inslee, said the
governor’s office is reviewing the court’s decision and will consult with
the Attorney General’s Office.
“But until we have a thorough analysis, we can’t say what that means for
schools operating today,” Postman said.
Under the 2012 law, up to 40 new charter schools could have opened in
Washington over a five-year period.
In December 2013, King County Superior Court Judge Jean Rietschel struck
down the part of the law that would have made charter schools eligible for
state construction money, but essentially cleared the way for the state
commission and the Spokane school district to authorize new schools.
Spokane
is the only school district with such authority.
All sides expected the case to reach the Supreme Court, which heard oral
arguments last October.
Washington State Charter School Commission Chair Steve Sundquist said that
commissioners anticipated a range of possible outcomes affecting funding,
but didn’t draw up a plan to deal with a complete reversal.
“We were not expecting a ruling as deeply disappointing as this one,”
Sundquist said.
He said the commission’s lawyer in the Attorney General’s Office will be
meeting Saturday morning with other attorneys to discuss options.
The attorney for the plaintiffs, Paul Lawrence, doesn’t think there’s much
more legal work to do on the issue. But he acknowledged that much has to be
sorted out regarding the nine charter schools that are already up and
running.
“The bottom line is that the initiative is unconstitutional so the charter
schools that were authorized under the charter-school initiative can’t be
publicly funded,” Lawrence said. “If there’s any avenue, it’s going to be
through some act of the Legislature.”
That’s what happened in Georgia.
In 2011, the Georgia Supreme Court struck down a 2008 law that created a
state commission to authorize charter schools, which have been legal in the
state since 1993.
The decision didn’t affect the vast majority of Georgia’s charter schools,
according to the Georgia Charter Schools Association. In 2012, voters
approved a constitutional amendment that reinstated the state commission.
Tom Franta, leader of the Washington State Charter Schools Association
advocacy group, said he was waiting to hear back from the nonprofit’s
attorney to find out what happens next.
“We haven’t had a chance to debrief the opinion with attorneys, with what
does happen next with the schools that are open,” he said.
Rep. Chad Magendanz, R-Issaquah, and ranking member on the House Education
Committee, said he was stunned by the decision.
“I’m shocked. I’m worried about the political aspects about this,”
Magendanz
said. “The court is becoming too much of ‘a political animal,’ ” said
Magendanz, a charter-school supporter.
http://e-max.it/posizionamento-siti-web/socialize
http://e-max.it/posizionamento-siti-web/socialize
