Boardman writes: "Waging genocidal war on a defenseless country was never so
baldly and honestly put on any agenda for talks among US Secretary of State
John Kerry, representatives of Saudi Arabia's dictatorship, and their mutual
allies, even though they are all engaged in an endless genocidal war on
Yemen."
Air strike by Saudi Arabia on the al-Oradi Hospital in Sanaa, Yemen on June
9, 2015. (photo: Alex Potter/Harpers)
US Okay With Surgical Strikes on Yemen Hospitals
By William Boardman, Reader Supported News
24 August 16
Nuremberg: "a war of aggression . is the supreme international crime"
Waging genocidal war on a defenseless country was never so baldly and
honestly put on any agenda for talks among US secretary of state John Kerry,
representatives of Saudi Arabia's dictatorship, and their mutual allies,
even though they are all engaged in an endless genocidal war on Yemen. This
war is a war of aggression, started by Saudi Arabia in March 2015, with
crucial US blessing, participation, personnel, and ordnance. The US has been
a willing, guilty partner and enabler in 18 months of military atrocities in
a one-sided war that everyone involved knew - or should have known - was a
pure war crime based on a paranoid delusion.
American participation in this war of aggression was a war declared by press
release from the National Security Council on March 25, 2015, another
example of the imperial presidency's ability to act by fiat without fear of
serious objection from the public, the media, or even Congress:
President Obama has authorized the provision of logistical and intelligence
support to GCC [Gulf Cooperation Council]-led military operations. [emphasis
added]
The fundamental crime in Yemen is waging a war of aggression, which
encompasses all the subsequent war crimes including bombing civilians, using
cluster bombs, bombing hospitals, bombing food supplies, and trying to
starve a population to submission or death. Yemen, with a population of 26
million people, was the poorest country in the region even before it was
attacked. What the US supports and sanctions against Yemen makes any US
complaint about Russian actions in Crimea sound like howling hypocrisy.
For all that the Saudis frame their war on Yemen as a defense against a
threat from Iran, there has never been any credible evidence of any credible
threat to Saudi Arabia from any element of the miniscule Iranian presence in
Yemen. Yemen is fighting a civil war, a new version of the same old civil
war Yemenis have been fighting for decades, both before and after Yemen was
two separate countries. The Iran "threat" is the paranoid delusion
supposedly justifying a merciless war on a civil population already beset by
a four-sided civil war. There is no way that those who decided to wage this
war of aggression could not have known the reality in Yemen if they had
wanted to know it. Presumably they knew it all full well and chose a war of
aggression anyway, recklessly, perhaps even thoughtlessly, but criminally
all the same. The Saudi goal was always get rid of a longstanding threat on
its southwestern border, where the tribal land of the Houthis lay both in
Yemen and Saudi Arabia. When the long-oppressed Houthis, a Shia minority in
a Sunni world, drove out the Sunni government of Yemen in 2015, the Saudis,
without saying so in so many words, decided on a course of action that could
lead to a final solution. And everyone knew, at the time, and no one
objected, according to this account by the highly reliable Andrew Cockburn
on Democracy NOW! (whose piece in Harper's Magazine for September 2016,
ironically titled "Acceptable Losses," provides an excellent exegesis of the
war on Yemen, but with a more elegiac tone):
I was told, very early on in the war, Deputy Secretary of State Tony Blinken
went to Riyadh to ask the-this is two weeks-yeah, it was two weeks into the
war [mid-April 2015], when they had already been bombing away, using the
U.S. bombs, U.S.-supplied bombs, using U.S. weapons, killing already dozens,
if not certainly, you know, hundreds of civilians, destroying factories. And
finally, Blinken turns up in Riyadh and asks, "By the way, what are you
trying to accomplish here?" And the Saudis effectively said, or at least the
Americans understood them to say, "Well, we basically want to wipe out the
Houthis." Well, they termed it as "end all Iranian influence in Yemen." So,
the Americans-Blinken was a bit shocked by that, so I'm told, and said,
"Well, you know, that's going a bit far. But it's-you should certainly stop
the Houthis taking over the country." And that, effectively, gave the Saudis
carte blanche to continue this kind of mindless carpet bombing..
By 2015, American hands were already bloody with the US drone assassination
program that had killed not only innocent civilians, but American citizens,
without a trace of due process of law. In effect, already enmeshed in its
own nexus of war crimes in Yemen, the US green-lighted the Saudi-led war of
aggression that would make American crimes pale by comparison. As American
policy over the years would have it, American weapons have been dispersed
all over Yemen since 2006.
Kerry to consult on terrorism, but not US or Saudi terrorism
Terror bombing, an example of which is Saudi pilots flying American planes
dropping American bombs on defenseless Yemeni civilian targets, is probably
not the terrorism Secretary Kerry wants to discuss - ever - with the Saudis
and their allies, never mind other weapons suppliers like France and the
United Kingdom. As the official State Department notice put it in deadly
opaque prose:
Secretary Kerry will travel to Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, for a series of
meetings with senior Saudi leaders, his counterparts from the Gulf
Cooperation Council, the United Kingdom, and the United Nations Special
Envoy for Yemen. His discussion will focus on the ongoing conflict in Yemen
and efforts to restore peace and stability..
Those "efforts to restore peace and stability" notably include the
destruction of two schools, another hospital, and a potato chip factory,
along with the associated men, women, and children, especially at the
schools. Perhaps the latest great military "victory" achieved by the war
criminals known as the Saudi-led coalition is to drive the world's leading
medical crisis-zone organization out of Yemen by targeting its hospitals
over and over and over and over since March 2015. Of course, America the
Exceptional does not stand for this betrayal of human decency, and our
presidential candidates of all parties have railed ceaselessly against this
indiscriminate murder of patients, their families, their doctors and other
medical personnel, forcing the White House to take action to bring to an end
17 months of aggressive war and other war crimes and crimes against humanity
- no, wait, that's not happening, is it?
Actually, if any presidential candidate of any political party has expressed
the slightest objection to the Saudi-coalition's genocidal war on Yemen,
such evidence is so hard to come by that it may as well not exist. (In
August 2015, Jill Stein of the Green Party mentioned in passing that the
Saudis "are committing war crimes right now in Yemen," and more recently she
called for an end to US funding for Saudi Arabia and Israel because of their
violations of human rights laws, but she does not tend to make a point of
the US support for a war of aggression in Yemen. But she's better than any
other candidate on Yemen.) At this point, a year and a half into our shared
war of aggression, every candidate is complicit in this horrendous,
unjustified war promoted and pursued with smug disdain for anything like
peace by our peace prize winning President Obama. The blood drips from all
their hands, their feet, their tongues and eyelashes, but most of all from
every pore of our Nobel Laureate in the White House. (As the book Double
Down reported in 2012: "Turns out I'm really good at killing people," Obama
said quietly, "Didn't know that was gonna be a strong suit of mine.")
With the US at war, Congress has nothing to say about any of it
The US is at war with Yemen, in support of the Saudi-led coalition that
launched its undeclared war of aggression on March 26, 2015. US war-making
includes, but is not limited to: US intelligence services providing
intelligence to the aggressor nations; US military personnel participating
in daily target planning and attack assessment; US tanker aircraft
re-fueling aggressor nation aircraft bombing Yemen (46,500 acknowledged
sorties in the first 11 months of war); US drones targeting and attacking
under US control; US military contractors servicing the Saudi F-15s that
bomb Yemen; US personnel training Saudi military; US military personnel
operating in Yemen; and the US Navy reinforcing the Saudi blockade intent on
starving Yemen into submission.
The US Congress has never debated, never authorized US participation in a
war of aggression against Yemen. The US president has never asked Congress
for such authorization of a war of aggression against Yemen. Neither house
of Congress has acted on any bill that directly addresses the war of
aggression against Yemen. More than a year after the war started, two
Democratic members of Congress (joined by two Republicans) introduced
identical bills intended to respond to the war. California congressman Ted
Lieu (joined by Florida congressman Ted Yoho) and Connecticut senator
Christopher Murphy (joined by Kentucky senator Rand Paul) asked their
colleagues to address the horrors of the war (briefly enumerated in the
bill), not by ending the war, but only by temporarily limiting US arms sales
to Saudi Arabia. That's it. They did not mention US participation in the
war. Both their bills were referred to committee. At the time there was a
spotty ceasefire in Yemen while peace talks proceeded in Kuwait (the talks
were suspended in early August, leading to the Saudi escalation currently
killing more civilians).
Incredibly, this non-response response to war crimes in Yemen has gotten
Rep. Lieu some recent positive press coverage, in The Intercept of August 22
and elsewhere, even though his bill is designed to have no immediate impact
on the carnage. Rep. Lieu is a colonel in the US Air Force Reserve. When he
was on active duty he taught the law of war to other Air Force officers. His
interview rhetoric, like most of his public action, is soft-edged even
though he knows perfectly well his country is committing war crimes. He
almost said as much in an August 15 statement objecting to the Saudi attack
on a school in Haydan, Yemen, that killed 10 children:
The indiscriminate civilian killings by Saudi Arabia look like war crimes to
me. In this case, children as young as 8 were killed by Saudi Arabian air
strikes. By assisting Saudi Arabia, the United States is aiding and abetting
what appears to be war crimes in Yemen. The Administration must stop
enabling this madness now. [emphasis in original]
Rep. Lieu and others have also objected to the State Department's
certification of another arms sale to Saudi Arabia: this one is $1.15
billion for 153 tanks, hundreds of machine guns, and other war materiel.
This is in addition to the record $100 billion in arms sales to the Saudis
already made by the Obama administration. The latest arms deal suggested to
Rep. Lieu "that the administration is, at best, callously indifferent to the
mass amount of civilians dying as a result of the Saudi-led coalition's
bombing." He did not openly consider whether 153 Abrams Main Battle Tanks
and other weaponry might open the way for the air war of aggression to be
matched by an escalation of the ground war of aggression as well. Twenty of
those new US tanks are specifically designated as replacements for tanks
lost in combat, some of them in Yemen. On the other hand, the official State
Department notice of the Abrams Tank sale assures Congress: "The proposed
sale of this equipment and support will not alter the basic military balance
in the region." That's hardly reassuring in a region where wars of attrition
and military quagmires are killing not only thousands of Yemenis, but
Palestinians, Israelis, Lebanese, Syrians, Saudis, Turks, Kurds, Iraqis,
Afghans, and god knows who else, more often than not with Made-in-USA
weapons and munitions.
The proposed US tank sale has drawn the attention of several NGOs
(non-governmental organizations) looking to wash American hands of the war
on Yemen by blocking the sale, or at least having a debate about it in
Congress. Human Rights Watch (HRW) wrote a letter to Secretary Kerry August
19, with temperate language of concern about several countries, including
Yemen. HRW asked Secretary Kerry "to emphasize the potential consequences if
Saudi Arabia fails to improve its conduct." But it did not suggest what
those consequences might be in light of the reality that the US has
coordinated and condones all Saudi conduct to date. CODEPINK is supporting a
petition to support the Congressional letter that urges President Obama to
postpone the US tank sale to the Saudis.
Even The New York Times is expressing something shy of anguish over
"American complicity" and "carnage" and targets that are not "legitimate"
under international law as it supports efforts to block the tank sale in
Congress. The Times doesn't mention that this is the same Congress that in
June - supporting a White House request - refused to block the sale of
cluster bombs to Saudi Arabia for fear of "stigmatizing" cluster bombs.
That's a reflection of the American version of reality, since cluster bombs
are already stigmatized by most countries of the world and using them on
civilians, as US-Saudi forces do in Yemen, is widely understood to be a war
crime. The solution, according to the Times:
Congress should put the arms sales on hold and President Obama should
quietly inform Riyadh that the United States will withdraw crucial
assistance if the Saudis do not stop targeting civilians and agree to
negotiate peace.
That can't happen in the real world, where the president and the Saudis all
know they are war criminals and are, like Macbeth, so steeped in blood "that
should I wade no more,/Returning were as tedious as go o'er."
There is no reason to expect any good to come to Yemen until a whole lot
more Americans face the reality of their country's support for a genocidal
war of aggression. When enough Americans recognize that, then they will have
to do a lot more about it than stop selling tanks to the aggressors. Until
then the US-sponsored atrocity of ethnic cleansing in a poverty-stricken
country that threatens no one will continue unabated.
________________________________________
William M. Boardman has over 40 years experience in theatre, radio, TV,
print journalism, and non-fiction, including 20 years in the Vermont
judiciary. He has received honors from Writers Guild of America, Corporation
for Public Broadcasting, Vermont Life magazine, and an Emmy Award nomination
from the Academy of Television Arts and Sciences.
Reader Supported News is the Publication of Origin for this work. Permission
to republish is freely granted with credit and a link back to Reader
Supported News.
Error! Hyperlink reference not valid. Error! Hyperlink reference not valid.
Air strike by Saudi Arabia on the al-Oradi Hospital in Sanaa, Yemen on June
9, 2015. (photo: Alex Potter/Harpers)
http://readersupportednews.org/http://readersupportednews.org/
US Okay With Surgical Strikes on Yemen Hospitals
By William Boardman, Reader Supported News
24 August 16
Nuremberg: "a war of aggression . is the supreme international crime"
aging genocidal war on a defenseless country was never so baldly and
honestly put on any agenda for talks among US secretary of state John Kerry,
representatives of Saudi Arabia's dictatorship, and their mutual allies,
even though they are all engaged in an endless genocidal war on Yemen. This
war is a war of aggression, started by Saudi Arabia in March 2015, with
crucial US blessing, participation, personnel, and ordnance. The US has been
a willing, guilty partner and enabler in 18 months of military atrocities in
a one-sided war that everyone involved knew - or should have known - was a
pure war crime based on a paranoid delusion.
American participation in this war of aggression was a war declared by press
release from the National Security Council on March 25, 2015, another
example of the imperial presidency's ability to act by fiat without fear of
serious objection from the public, the media, or even Congress:
President Obama has authorized the provision of logistical and intelligence
support to GCC [Gulf Cooperation Council]-led military operations. [emphasis
added]
The fundamental crime in Yemen is waging a war of aggression, which
encompasses all the subsequent war crimes including bombing civilians, using
cluster bombs, bombing hospitals, bombing food supplies, and trying to
starve a population to submission or death. Yemen, with a population of 26
million people, was the poorest country in the region even before it was
attacked. What the US supports and sanctions against Yemen makes any US
complaint about Russian actions in Crimea sound like howling hypocrisy.
For all that the Saudis frame their war on Yemen as a defense against a
threat from Iran, there has never been any credible evidence of any credible
threat to Saudi Arabia from any element of the miniscule Iranian presence in
Yemen. Yemen is fighting a civil war, a new version of the same old civil
war Yemenis have been fighting for decades, both before and after Yemen was
two separate countries. The Iran "threat" is the paranoid delusion
supposedly justifying a merciless war on a civil population already beset by
a four-sided civil war. There is no way that those who decided to wage this
war of aggression could not have known the reality in Yemen if they had
wanted to know it. Presumably they knew it all full well and chose a war of
aggression anyway, recklessly, perhaps even thoughtlessly, but criminally
all the same. The Saudi goal was always get rid of a longstanding threat on
its southwestern border, where the tribal land of the Houthis lay both in
Yemen and Saudi Arabia. When the long-oppressed Houthis, a Shia minority in
a Sunni world, drove out the Sunni government of Yemen in 2015, the Saudis,
without saying so in so many words, decided on a course of action that could
lead to a final solution. And everyone knew, at the time, and no one
objected, according to this account by the highly reliable Andrew Cockburn
on Democracy NOW! (whose piece in Harper's Magazine for September 2016,
ironically titled "Acceptable Losses," provides an excellent exegesis of the
war on Yemen, but with a more elegiac tone):
I was told, very early on in the war, Deputy Secretary of State Tony Blinken
went to Riyadh to ask the-this is two weeks-yeah, it was two weeks into the
war [mid-April 2015], when they had already been bombing away, using the
U.S. bombs, U.S.-supplied bombs, using U.S. weapons, killing already dozens,
if not certainly, you know, hundreds of civilians, destroying factories. And
finally, Blinken turns up in Riyadh and asks, "By the way, what are you
trying to accomplish here?" And the Saudis effectively said, or at least the
Americans understood them to say, "Well, we basically want to wipe out the
Houthis." Well, they termed it as "end all Iranian influence in Yemen." So,
the Americans-Blinken was a bit shocked by that, so I'm told, and said,
"Well, you know, that's going a bit far. But it's-you should certainly stop
the Houthis taking over the country." And that, effectively, gave the Saudis
carte blanche to continue this kind of mindless carpet bombing..
By 2015, American hands were already bloody with the US drone assassination
program that had killed not only innocent civilians, but American citizens,
without a trace of due process of law. In effect, already enmeshed in its
own nexus of war crimes in Yemen, the US green-lighted the Saudi-led war of
aggression that would make American crimes pale by comparison. As American
policy over the years would have it, American weapons have been dispersed
all over Yemen since 2006.
Kerry to consult on terrorism, but not US or Saudi terrorism
Terror bombing, an example of which is Saudi pilots flying American planes
dropping American bombs on defenseless Yemeni civilian targets, is probably
not the terrorism Secretary Kerry wants to discuss - ever - with the Saudis
and their allies, never mind other weapons suppliers like France and the
United Kingdom. As the official State Department notice put it in deadly
opaque prose:
Secretary Kerry will travel to Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, for a series of
meetings with senior Saudi leaders, his counterparts from the Gulf
Cooperation Council, the United Kingdom, and the United Nations Special
Envoy for Yemen. His discussion will focus on the ongoing conflict in Yemen
and efforts to restore peace and stability..
Those "efforts to restore peace and stability" notably include the
destruction of two schools, another hospital, and a potato chip factory,
along with the associated men, women, and children, especially at the
schools. Perhaps the latest great military "victory" achieved by the war
criminals known as the Saudi-led coalition is to drive the world's leading
medical crisis-zone organization out of Yemen by targeting its hospitals
over and over and over and over since March 2015. Of course, America the
Exceptional does not stand for this betrayal of human decency, and our
presidential candidates of all parties have railed ceaselessly against this
indiscriminate murder of patients, their families, their doctors and other
medical personnel, forcing the White House to take action to bring to an end
17 months of aggressive war and other war crimes and crimes against humanity
- no, wait, that's not happening, is it?
Actually, if any presidential candidate of any political party has expressed
the slightest objection to the Saudi-coalition's genocidal war on Yemen,
such evidence is so hard to come by that it may as well not exist. (In
August 2015, Jill Stein of the Green Party mentioned in passing that the
Saudis "are committing war crimes right now in Yemen," and more recently she
called for an end to US funding for Saudi Arabia and Israel because of their
violations of human rights laws, but she does not tend to make a point of
the US support for a war of aggression in Yemen. But she's better than any
other candidate on Yemen.) At this point, a year and a half into our shared
war of aggression, every candidate is complicit in this horrendous,
unjustified war promoted and pursued with smug disdain for anything like
peace by our peace prize winning President Obama. The blood drips from all
their hands, their feet, their tongues and eyelashes, but most of all from
every pore of our Nobel Laureate in the White House. (As the book Double
Down reported in 2012: "Turns out I'm really good at killing people," Obama
said quietly, "Didn't know that was gonna be a strong suit of mine.")
With the US at war, Congress has nothing to say about any of it
The US is at war with Yemen, in support of the Saudi-led coalition that
launched its undeclared war of aggression on March 26, 2015. US war-making
includes, but is not limited to: US intelligence services providing
intelligence to the aggressor nations; US military personnel participating
in daily target planning and attack assessment; US tanker aircraft
re-fueling aggressor nation aircraft bombing Yemen (46,500 acknowledged
sorties in the first 11 months of war); US drones targeting and attacking
under US control; US military contractors servicing the Saudi F-15s that
bomb Yemen; US personnel training Saudi military; US military personnel
operating in Yemen; and the US Navy reinforcing the Saudi blockade intent on
starving Yemen into submission.
The US Congress has never debated, never authorized US participation in a
war of aggression against Yemen. The US president has never asked Congress
for such authorization of a war of aggression against Yemen. Neither house
of Congress has acted on any bill that directly addresses the war of
aggression against Yemen. More than a year after the war started, two
Democratic members of Congress (joined by two Republicans) introduced
identical bills intended to respond to the war. California congressman Ted
Lieu (joined by Florida congressman Ted Yoho) and Connecticut senator
Christopher Murphy (joined by Kentucky senator Rand Paul) asked their
colleagues to address the horrors of the war (briefly enumerated in the
bill), not by ending the war, but only by temporarily limiting US arms sales
to Saudi Arabia. That's it. They did not mention US participation in the
war. Both their bills were referred to committee. At the time there was a
spotty ceasefire in Yemen while peace talks proceeded in Kuwait (the talks
were suspended in early August, leading to the Saudi escalation currently
killing more civilians).
Incredibly, this non-response response to war crimes in Yemen has gotten
Rep. Lieu some recent positive press coverage, in The Intercept of August 22
and elsewhere, even though his bill is designed to have no immediate impact
on the carnage. Rep. Lieu is a colonel in the US Air Force Reserve. When he
was on active duty he taught the law of war to other Air Force officers. His
interview rhetoric, like most of his public action, is soft-edged even
though he knows perfectly well his country is committing war crimes. He
almost said as much in an August 15 statement objecting to the Saudi attack
on a school in Haydan, Yemen, that killed 10 children:
The indiscriminate civilian killings by Saudi Arabia look like war crimes to
me. In this case, children as young as 8 were killed by Saudi Arabian air
strikes. By assisting Saudi Arabia, the United States is aiding and abetting
what appears to be war crimes in Yemen. The Administration must stop
enabling this madness now. [emphasis in original]
Rep. Lieu and others have also objected to the State Department's
certification of another arms sale to Saudi Arabia: this one is $1.15
billion for 153 tanks, hundreds of machine guns, and other war materiel.
This is in addition to the record $100 billion in arms sales to the Saudis
already made by the Obama administration. The latest arms deal suggested to
Rep. Lieu "that the administration is, at best, callously indifferent to the
mass amount of civilians dying as a result of the Saudi-led coalition's
bombing." He did not openly consider whether 153 Abrams Main Battle Tanks
and other weaponry might open the way for the air war of aggression to be
matched by an escalation of the ground war of aggression as well. Twenty of
those new US tanks are specifically designated as replacements for tanks
lost in combat, some of them in Yemen. On the other hand, the official State
Department notice of the Abrams Tank sale assures Congress: "The proposed
sale of this equipment and support will not alter the basic military balance
in the region." That's hardly reassuring in a region where wars of attrition
and military quagmires are killing not only thousands of Yemenis, but
Palestinians, Israelis, Lebanese, Syrians, Saudis, Turks, Kurds, Iraqis,
Afghans, and god knows who else, more often than not with Made-in-USA
weapons and munitions.
The proposed US tank sale has drawn the attention of several NGOs
(non-governmental organizations) looking to wash American hands of the war
on Yemen by blocking the sale, or at least having a debate about it in
Congress. Human Rights Watch (HRW) wrote a letter to Secretary Kerry August
19, with temperate language of concern about several countries, including
Yemen. HRW asked Secretary Kerry "to emphasize the potential consequences if
Saudi Arabia fails to improve its conduct." But it did not suggest what
those consequences might be in light of the reality that the US has
coordinated and condones all Saudi conduct to date. CODEPINK is supporting a
petition to support the Congressional letter that urges President Obama to
postpone the US tank sale to the Saudis.
Even The New York Times is expressing something shy of anguish over
"American complicity" and "carnage" and targets that are not "legitimate"
under international law as it supports efforts to block the tank sale in
Congress. The Times doesn't mention that this is the same Congress that in
June - supporting a White House request - refused to block the sale of
cluster bombs to Saudi Arabia for fear of "stigmatizing" cluster bombs.
That's a reflection of the American version of reality, since cluster bombs
are already stigmatized by most countries of the world and using them on
civilians, as US-Saudi forces do in Yemen, is widely understood to be a war
crime. The solution, according to the Times:
Congress should put the arms sales on hold and President Obama should
quietly inform Riyadh that the United States will withdraw crucial
assistance if the Saudis do not stop targeting civilians and agree to
negotiate peace.
That can't happen in the real world, where the president and the Saudis all
know they are war criminals and are, like Macbeth, so steeped in blood "that
should I wade no more,/Returning were as tedious as go o'er."
There is no reason to expect any good to come to Yemen until a whole lot
more Americans face the reality of their country's support for a genocidal
war of aggression. When enough Americans recognize that, then they will have
to do a lot more about it than stop selling tanks to the aggressors. Until
then the US-sponsored atrocity of ethnic cleansing in a poverty-stricken
country that threatens no one will continue unabated.
William M. Boardman has over 40 years experience in theatre, radio, TV,
print journalism, and non-fiction, including 20 years in the Vermont
judiciary. He has received honors from Writers Guild of America, Corporation
for Public Broadcasting, Vermont Life magazine, and an Emmy Award nomination
from the Academy of Television Arts and Sciences.
Reader Supported News is the Publication of Origin for this work. Permission
to republish is freely granted with credit and a link back to Reader
Supported News.
http://e-max.it/posizionamento-siti-web/socialize
http://e-max.it/posizionamento-siti-web/socialize
