[blind-democracy] Turkey Provokes Russia with Shoot-down

  • From: Miriam Vieni <miriamvieni@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: blind-democracy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 22:10:08 -0500

Turkey Provokes Russia with Shoot-down
Published on
Wednesday, November 25, 2015
by
Consortium News
Turkey Provokes Russia with Shoot-down
Turkey appears to have deliberately shot down a Russian warplane as a
provocation designed to escalate tensions between NATO and Russia, a ploy
that seems to have sucked in President Obama as he tries to look tough
against Russia to appease his neocon critics
by
Robert Parry

Russian President Vladimir Putin angrily called the Turkish attack a "stab
in the back delivered by the accomplices of terrorists." He warned of
"serious consequences for Russian-Turkish relations." (Photo: Kremlin Press
Service)
President Barack Obama - always sensitive to neocon criticism that he's
"weak" - continues to edge the world closer to a nuclear confrontation with
Russia as he talks tough and tolerates more provocations against Moscow, now
including Turkey's intentional shoot-down of a Russian warplane along the
Turkish-Syrian border.
Rather than rebuke Turkey, a NATO member, for its reckless behavior - or
express sympathy to the Russians - Obama instead asserted that "Turkey, like
every country, has a right to defend its territory and its airspace."
It was another one of Obama's breathtaking moments of hypocrisy, since he
has repeatedly violated the territorial integrity of various countries,
including in Syria where he has authorized bombing without the government's
permission and has armed rebels fighting to overthrow Syria's secular
regime.
Obama's comment on Turkey's right to shoot down planes - made during a joint
press conference with French President Francois Hollande on Tuesday - was
jarring, too, because there was no suggestion that even if the SU-24
jetfighter had strayed briefly into Turkish territory, which the Russians
deny, that it was threatening Turkish targets.
Russian President Vladimir Putin angrily called the Turkish attack a "stab
in the back delivered by the accomplices of terrorists." He warned of
"serious consequences for Russian-Turkish relations."
Further provoking the Russians, Turkish-backed Syrian rebels then killed the
two Russian pilots by riddling their bodies with bullets after they
parachuted from the doomed plane and were floating toward the ground.
Another Russian soldier was killed when a U.S.-supplied TOW missile brought
down a Russian helicopter on a search-and-rescue mission, according to
reports.
But Obama, during the news conference, seemed more interested in
demonstrating his disdain for Putin, referring to him at one point by his
last name only, without the usual use of a courtesy title, and demeaning the
size of Putin's coalition in helping Syria battle the jihadist rebels.
"We've got a coalition of 65 countries who have been active in pushing back
against ISIL for quite some time," Obama said, citing the involvement of
countries around the world. "Russia right now is a coalition of two, Iran
and Russia, supporting [Syrian President Bashar al-] Assad."
However, there have been doubts about the seriousness of Obama's coalition,
which includes Sunni countries, such as Saudi Arabia and Turkey, which have
been covertly supporting some of the jihadist elements, including Al Qaeda's
Nusra Front and its ally, Ahrar al-Sham.
Syrian rebels, including jihadists fighting with Ahrar al-Sham, have
received hundreds of U.S. TOW anti-tank missiles, apparently through Sunni
regional powers with what I've been told was Obama's direct approval. The
jihadists have celebrated their use of TOWs to kill tank crews of the Syrian
army. Yet Obama talks about every country's right to defend its territory.
Obama and the U.S. mainstream media also have pretended that the only
terrorists that need to be fought in Syria are those belonging to the
Islamic State (also known as ISIS, ISIL or Daesh), but Al Qaeda's Nusra
Front and its ally, Ahrar al-Sham, which was founded in part by Al Qaeda
veterans, make up the bulk of the Turkish-and-Saudi-backed Army of Conquest
which was gaining ground - with the help of those American TOW missiles -
until Russia intervened with air power at the request of Syrian President
Assad in late September.
The SU-24 Shoot-down
As for the circumstances surrounding the Turkish shoot-down of the Russian
SU-24, Turkey claimed to have radioed ten warnings over five minutes to the
Russian pilots but without getting a response. However, the New York Times
reported that a diplomat who attended a NATO meeting in which Turkey laid
out its account said "the Russian SU-24 plane was over the Hatay region of
Turkey for about 17 seconds when it was struck."
How those two contradictory time frames matched up was not explained.
However, if the 17-second time frame is correct, it appears that Turkey
intended to shoot down a Russian plane - whether over its territory or not -
to send a message that it would not permit Russia to continue attacking
Turkish-backed rebels in Syria.
After shooting down the plane, Turkey sought an emergency NATO meeting to
support its attack. Though some NATO members reportedly consider Turkish
President Recep Tayyip Erdogan a loose cannon, NATO Secretary General Jens
Stoltenberg declared that the allies "stand in solidarity with Turkey."
Further increasing the prospect of a dangerous escalation, NATO has been
conducting large-scale military exercises near the Russian border in
response to the Ukraine crisis.
Erdogan's government also appears to have dabbled in dangerous provocations
before, including the alleged role of Turkish intelligence in helping
jihadist rebels stage a lethal sarin gas attack outside Damascus on Aug. 21,
2013, with the goal of blaming Assad's military and tricking Obama into
launching punitive airstrikes that would have helped clear the way for a
jihadist victory.
Obama only pulled back at the last minute amid doubts among U.S.
intelligence analysts about who was responsible for the sarin attack. Later
evidence pointed to a jihadist provocation with possible Turkish assistance,
but the Obama administration has never formally retracted its allegations
blaming Assad's forces.
One motive for Erdogan to go along with the sarin "false flag" attack in
2013 would have been that his two-year campaign to overthrow the Assad
government was sputtering, a situation similar to today with the Russian
military intervention hammering jihadist positions and putting the Syrian
army back on the offensive.
By shooting down a Russian plane and then rushing to NATO with demands for
retaliation against Russia, Erdogan is arguably playing a similar game,
trying to push the United States and European countries into a direct
confrontation with Russia while also sabotaging Syrian peace talks in Vienna
- all the better to advance his goal of violently ousting Assad from power.
The Neocon Agenda
Escalating tensions with Russia also plays into the hands of America's
neoconservatives who have viewed past cooperation between Putin and Obama as
a threat to the neocon agenda of "regime change," which began in Iraq in
2003 and was supposed to continue into Syria and Iran with the goal of
removing governments deemed hostile to Israel.
After the sarin gas attack in 2013, the prospect for the U.S. bombing Syria
and paving the way for Assad's military defeat looked bright, but Putin and
Obama cooperated to defuse the sarin gas crisis. The two teamed up again to
advance negotiations to constrain Iran's nuclear program - a threat to
neocon hopes for bombing Iran, too.
However, in late 2013 and early 2014, that promising Putin-Obama
collaboration was blasted apart in Ukraine with American neocons playing key
roles, including National Endowment for Democracy president Carl Gershman,
Sen. John McCain and Assistant Secretary of State for European Affairs
Victoria Nuland.
The neocons targeted the elected government of President Viktor Yanukovych,
recognizing how sensitive Ukraine was to Russia. The Feb. 22, 2014 coup,
which was spearheaded by neo-Nazis and other extreme Ukrainian nationalists,
established a fiercely anti-Russian regime in Kiev and provoked what quickly
took on the look of a new Cold War.
When the heavily ethnic Russian population of Crimea, which had voted
overwhelmingly for Yanukovych, reacted to the coup by voting 96 percent to
leave Ukraine and rejoin Russia, the neocon-dominated U.S. mainstream media
pronounced the referendum a "sham" and the secession a Russian "invasion."
Cold War hysteria followed.
However, in the nearly two years since the Ukraine coup, it has become
increasingly clear that the new regime in Kiev is not the shining light that
the neocons and the mainstream media pretended it was. It appears to be as
corrupt as the old one, if not more so. Plus, livings standards of average
Ukrainians have plunged.
The recent flooding of Europe with Syrian refugees over the summer and this
month's Paris terror attacks by Islamic State jihadists also have forced
European officials to take events in Syria more seriously, prompting a
growing interest in a renewed cooperation with Russia's Putin.
That did not sit well with ultranationalist Ukrainians angered at the
reduced interest in the Ukraine crisis. These activists have forced their
dispute with Russia back into the newspapers by destroying power lines
supplying electricity to Crimea, throwing much of the peninsula into
darkness. Their goal seems to be to ratchet up tensions again between Russia
and the West.
Now, Turkey's shoot-down of the SU-24 and the deliberate murder of the two
Russian pilots have driven another wedge between NATO countries and Russia,
especially if President Obama and other NATO leaders continue taking
Turkey's side in the incident.
But the larger question - indeed the existential question - is whether Obama
will continue bowing to neocon demands for tough talk against Putin even if
doing so risks pushing tensions to a level that could spill over into a
nuclear confrontation.
C 2015 Consortium News
Turkey Provokes Russia with Shoot-down
Published on
Wednesday, November 25, 2015
by
Consortium News
Turkey Provokes Russia with Shoot-down
Turkey appears to have deliberately shot down a Russian warplane as a
provocation designed to escalate tensions between NATO and Russia, a ploy
that seems to have sucked in President Obama as he tries to look tough
against Russia to appease his neocon critics
by
Robert Parry
. 9 Comments
.
. Russian President Vladimir Putin angrily called the Turkish attack a
"stab in the back delivered by the accomplices of terrorists." He warned of
"serious consequences for Russian-Turkish relations." (Photo: Kremlin Press
Service)
. President Barack Obama - always sensitive to neocon criticism that
he's "weak" - continues to edge the world closer to a nuclear confrontation
with Russia as he talks tough and tolerates more provocations against
Moscow, now including Turkey's intentional shoot-down of a Russian warplane
along the Turkish-Syrian border.
. Rather than rebuke Turkey, a NATO member, for its reckless behavior
- or express sympathy to the Russians - Obama instead asserted that "Turkey,
like every country, has a right to defend its territory and its airspace."
. It was another one of Obama's breathtaking moments of hypocrisy,
since he has repeatedly violated the territorial integrity of various
countries, including in Syria where he has authorized bombing without the
government's permission and has armed rebels fighting to overthrow Syria's
secular regime.
. Obama's comment on Turkey's right to shoot down planes - made during
a joint press conference with French President Francois Hollande on Tuesday
- was jarring, too, because there was no suggestion that even if the SU-24
jetfighter had strayed briefly into Turkish territory, which the Russians
deny, that it was threatening Turkish targets.
Russian President Vladimir Putin angrily called the Turkish attack a "stab
in the back delivered by the accomplices of terrorists." He warned of
"serious consequences for Russian-Turkish relations."
Further provoking the Russians, Turkish-backed Syrian rebels then killed the
two Russian pilots by riddling their bodies with bullets after they
parachuted from the doomed plane and were floating toward the ground.
Another Russian soldier was killed when a U.S.-supplied TOW missile brought
down a Russian helicopter on a search-and-rescue mission, according to
reports.
But Obama, during the news conference, seemed more interested in
demonstrating his disdain for Putin, referring to him at one point by his
last name only, without the usual use of a courtesy title, and demeaning the
size of Putin's coalition in helping Syria battle the jihadist rebels.
"We've got a coalition of 65 countries who have been active in pushing back
against ISIL for quite some time," Obama said, citing the involvement of
countries around the world. "Russia right now is a coalition of two, Iran
and Russia, supporting [Syrian President Bashar al-] Assad."
However, there have been doubts about the seriousness of Obama's coalition,
which includes Sunni countries, such as Saudi Arabia and Turkey, which have
been covertly supporting some of the jihadist elements, including Al Qaeda's
Nusra Front and its ally, Ahrar al-Sham.
Syrian rebels, including jihadists fighting with Ahrar al-Sham, have
received hundreds of U.S. TOW anti-tank missiles, apparently through Sunni
regional powers with what I've been told was Obama's direct approval. The
jihadists have celebrated their use of TOWs to kill tank crews of the Syrian
army. Yet Obama talks about every country's right to defend its territory.
Obama and the U.S. mainstream media also have pretended that the only
terrorists that need to be fought in Syria are those belonging to the
Islamic State (also known as ISIS, ISIL or Daesh), but Al Qaeda's Nusra
Front and its ally, Ahrar al-Sham, which was founded in part by Al Qaeda
veterans, make up the bulk of the Turkish-and-Saudi-backed Army of Conquest
which was gaining ground - with the help of those American TOW missiles -
until Russia intervened with air power at the request of Syrian President
Assad in late September.
The SU-24 Shoot-down
As for the circumstances surrounding the Turkish shoot-down of the Russian
SU-24, Turkey claimed to have radioed ten warnings over five minutes to the
Russian pilots but without getting a response. However, the New York Times
reported that a diplomat who attended a NATO meeting in which Turkey laid
out its account said "the Russian SU-24 plane was over the Hatay region of
Turkey for about 17 seconds when it was struck."
How those two contradictory time frames matched up was not explained.
However, if the 17-second time frame is correct, it appears that Turkey
intended to shoot down a Russian plane - whether over its territory or not -
to send a message that it would not permit Russia to continue attacking
Turkish-backed rebels in Syria.
After shooting down the plane, Turkey sought an emergency NATO meeting to
support its attack. Though some NATO members reportedly consider Turkish
President Recep Tayyip Erdogan a loose cannon, NATO Secretary General Jens
Stoltenberg declared that the allies "stand in solidarity with Turkey."
Further increasing the prospect of a dangerous escalation, NATO has been
conducting large-scale military exercises near the Russian border in
response to the Ukraine crisis.
Erdogan's government also appears to have dabbled in dangerous provocations
before, including the alleged role of Turkish intelligence in helping
jihadist rebels stage a lethal sarin gas attack outside Damascus on Aug. 21,
2013, with the goal of blaming Assad's military and tricking Obama into
launching punitive airstrikes that would have helped clear the way for a
jihadist victory.
Obama only pulled back at the last minute amid doubts among U.S.
intelligence analysts about who was responsible for the sarin attack. Later
evidence pointed to a jihadist provocation with possible Turkish assistance,
but the Obama administration has never formally retracted its allegations
blaming Assad's forces.
One motive for Erdogan to go along with the sarin "false flag" attack in
2013 would have been that his two-year campaign to overthrow the Assad
government was sputtering, a situation similar to today with the Russian
military intervention hammering jihadist positions and putting the Syrian
army back on the offensive.
By shooting down a Russian plane and then rushing to NATO with demands for
retaliation against Russia, Erdogan is arguably playing a similar game,
trying to push the United States and European countries into a direct
confrontation with Russia while also sabotaging Syrian peace talks in Vienna
- all the better to advance his goal of violently ousting Assad from power.
The Neocon Agenda
Escalating tensions with Russia also plays into the hands of America's
neoconservatives who have viewed past cooperation between Putin and Obama as
a threat to the neocon agenda of "regime change," which began in Iraq in
2003 and was supposed to continue into Syria and Iran with the goal of
removing governments deemed hostile to Israel.
After the sarin gas attack in 2013, the prospect for the U.S. bombing Syria
and paving the way for Assad's military defeat looked bright, but Putin and
Obama cooperated to defuse the sarin gas crisis. The two teamed up again to
advance negotiations to constrain Iran's nuclear program - a threat to
neocon hopes for bombing Iran, too.
However, in late 2013 and early 2014, that promising Putin-Obama
collaboration was blasted apart in Ukraine with American neocons playing key
roles, including National Endowment for Democracy president Carl Gershman,
Sen. John McCain and Assistant Secretary of State for European Affairs
Victoria Nuland.
The neocons targeted the elected government of President Viktor Yanukovych,
recognizing how sensitive Ukraine was to Russia. The Feb. 22, 2014 coup,
which was spearheaded by neo-Nazis and other extreme Ukrainian nationalists,
established a fiercely anti-Russian regime in Kiev and provoked what quickly
took on the look of a new Cold War.
When the heavily ethnic Russian population of Crimea, which had voted
overwhelmingly for Yanukovych, reacted to the coup by voting 96 percent to
leave Ukraine and rejoin Russia, the neocon-dominated U.S. mainstream media
pronounced the referendum a "sham" and the secession a Russian "invasion."
Cold War hysteria followed.
However, in the nearly two years since the Ukraine coup, it has become
increasingly clear that the new regime in Kiev is not the shining light that
the neocons and the mainstream media pretended it was. It appears to be as
corrupt as the old one, if not more so. Plus, livings standards of average
Ukrainians have plunged.
The recent flooding of Europe with Syrian refugees over the summer and this
month's Paris terror attacks by Islamic State jihadists also have forced
European officials to take events in Syria more seriously, prompting a
growing interest in a renewed cooperation with Russia's Putin.
That did not sit well with ultranationalist Ukrainians angered at the
reduced interest in the Ukraine crisis. These activists have forced their
dispute with Russia back into the newspapers by destroying power lines
supplying electricity to Crimea, throwing much of the peninsula into
darkness. Their goal seems to be to ratchet up tensions again between Russia
and the West.
Now, Turkey's shoot-down of the SU-24 and the deliberate murder of the two
Russian pilots have driven another wedge between NATO countries and Russia,
especially if President Obama and other NATO leaders continue taking
Turkey's side in the incident.
But the larger question - indeed the existential question - is whether Obama
will continue bowing to neocon demands for tough talk against Putin even if
doing so risks pushing tensions to a level that could spill over into a
nuclear confrontation.
C 2015 Consortium News


Other related posts:

  • » [blind-democracy] Turkey Provokes Russia with Shoot-down - Miriam Vieni