Alice, that is what I was referring to as well. The interviews I have heard he
has quite obviously refused to endorse Clinton.
Frank
From: blind-democracy-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:blind-democracy-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Alice Dampman Humel
Sent: Friday, March 25, 2016 6:28 PM
To: blind-democracy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [blind-democracy] Re: Trump and Clinton's Big Night Poses Hard
Questions For Sanders Campaign and His Youthful Supporters
I have not heard him say that at all, in fact in an interview within the last
day or two, he was asked that question directly, whether he would support
Hillary, and he laughed, said something like, now don't get me into trouble
here, and left the question unanswered...has he changed his stance, or is one
of us missing something somewhere?
On Mar 25, 2016, at 6:16 PM, Miriam Vieni
<miriamvieni@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:miriamvieni@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Frank,
He ran as a Democrat so that his messsage would be heard. He has been
roundly criticized by the Left for not running as an independent and for
saying that if he does not win in the primaries, he will support Clinton. He
is being criticized by the Left because if there is any money left over in
his campaign treasury and he doesn't get the nomination, the money will go
to Hillary and he has said repeatedly that he will ask his supporters to
vote for her. He also said that he didn't run as an independent because he
didn't want to be "a spoiler". Really, if you're going to toss insults and
criticisms at him, it might be a good idea to first read all of the material
and get all the facts straight. I've posted Chris Hedges' tirades against
Sanders for running as a Democrat s well as the angry articles of several
other people like Glenn Ford.
Miriam
-----Original Message-----
From:
blind-democracy-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:blind-democracy-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[mailto:blind-democracy-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Frank Ventura
Sent: Friday, March 25, 2016 5:13 PM
To: blind-democracy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:blind-democracy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [blind-democracy] Re: Trump and Clinton's Big Night Poses Hard
Questions For Sanders Campaign and His Youthful Supporters
Marsha, your message is exactally what I am talking about. Your position
isn't in positive support of any viable candidate but instead is merely a
negative protest against one that you dislike (Clinton). Remember what they
say about your nose and your face. As far as Sanders goes; like I said, I
voted for him but I see now that he probably isn't serious about winning,
just serious about keeping Clinton out of office. The reason I say this is
that here in Massachusetts the primary was his to win. He could have won
easily but essentially flipped us the bird by not aggressively campaigning.
That was his betrayal. Also both you and Miriam are ignoring one very
important fact. Sanders switched from being an independent to a Democrat to
win. If he was serious about a presidential run he could have easily ran as
an independent. Why get on the Democratic ticket, if not to try to derail
the Democratic front runner?
Frank
-----Original Message-----
From:
blind-democracy-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:blind-democracy-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[mailto:blind-democracy-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Martian.Lady
Sent: Friday, March 25, 2016 2:21 AM
To: blind-democracy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:blind-democracy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [blind-democracy] Re: Trump and Clinton's Big Night Poses Hard
Questions For Sanders Campaign and His Youthful Supporters
HI
Who Says Sanders is running to be a spoiler. Perhaps he doesn't have much
of a chance but he has surprised people. Hilary is a two-faced liar who
really shouldn't even be elected to dog catcher. Would not want to take it
out on the poor dogs.
Marsha
