And we could theorize as to why he didn't. It appears that he didn't because
unllike the image that people had of him, he was a Corporate Democrat, a
politician who was right of center when it came to financial policy. He
epitomizes what the Democratic Party has become. We, the common people, no
longer have any party with political power, looking out for our interests.
Miriam
-----Original Message-----
From: blind-democracy-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:blind-democracy-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Charles Krugman
(Redacted sender "ckrugman" for DMARC)
Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2016 4:54 AM
To: blind-democracy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [blind-democracy] Re: Trump and Clinton's Big Night Poses Hard
Questions For Sanders Campaign and His Youthful Supporters
The problem is primarily the Republicans in Congress and if they were to
continue to maintain control they would be worse on Sanders than they were
on Obama. Now Obama did not srtrike in his first term when the iron was hot
which caused him problems for the rest of his administration. Had he come on
in a very decisive manner when he was first elected the scenario today might
be quite a bit different.
Chuck
-----Original Message-----
From: Carl Jarvis
Sent: Friday, March 25, 2016 10:27 AM
To: blind-democracy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [blind-democracy] Re: Trump and Clinton's Big Night Poses Hard
Questions For Sanders Campaign and His Youthful Supporters
I agree that the differences between Sanders and Obama could make a
difference for the working class, if Sanders were president. But I still
believe that the System is so corrupt and over powering, that Sanders would
be lucky to hold the current line.
Carl Jarvis
On 3/25/16, Miriam Vieni <miriamvieni@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Carl,escalation of war.
There is a question as to how much of what has happened in Obama's
administration can be blamed on the system and how much is his
individual responsibility. I say this because you assume that Bernie
Sanders would end up doing precisely the same things as Obama is
doing. And, you very well may be correct in that assumption. But there
are differences between them.
Obama
was a very ambitious young man who had wanted to become President for
some time and from the start, was willing to make all sorts of
compromises to attain his goal. Sanders is not ambitious in the same
way. He has tended to act on the same set of values throughout his
life. He makes political compromises, but they tend to be pragmatic
and are in the service of accomplishing specific goals relaging to
governance, not to his personal advancement. Because he comes from an
older generation, he doesn't see technology as the solution to most
problems as Obama does. Scott Shane's book points out that to Obama,
drone warfare seems like a naturally easy, precise way to dispose of
enemies without losing a lot of American lives, in the same way that
he believed that putting people's medical information in lectronic
files would fix many problems in our medical system. Obama's path to
the White House was calculated. Also, from the time that he began
living in the US, he attended an elite private school with wealthy,
privileged youngsters. Bernie lived in Brooklyn, attended public
school, and at first, one of our city colleges. His biological son was
conceived out of wedlock.
He and his son's mother never married, although they raised in
cooperatively. So yes, the pressures on a President in our century
are tremendous. But I have to think that how the President responds to
the pressures, is related to the kind of person that he is.
Miriam
-----Original Message-----
From: blind-democracy-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:blind-democracy-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Carl Jarvis
Sent: Friday, March 25, 2016 10:38 AM
To: blind-democracy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [blind-democracy] Re: Trump and Clinton's Big Night Poses
Hard Questions For Sanders Campaign and His Youthful Supporters
My my my, Frank. Do I detect just a whisper of cynicism?
Nonetheless, tomorrow I will trot off to the Quilcene high school to
participate in our caucus and cast my lot with Bernie Sanders. And
when we get past the Democratic Party freezing Sanders out, I will
most probably go fishing during the general election.
So far as I'm concerned, the Democratic Party is the Republican Party.
The last time I went Democrat and voted for a moderate, he turned out
to be a corporate man in a dark skin. So I voted for Jill Stein in
the 2012 election. And we did not wind up with some crazy Republican.
We wound up with an inept Democrat. But worse than that, Obama has
the blood of thousands...maybe millions, of innocent people on his
Liberal hands.
Which brings me back to my vote for Bernie. My vote for Bernie
Sanders is a Fool's Mission. If he did manage to win the Brass Ring,
he would find himself in exactly the same place Barak Obama is in.
And I don't mean the Oval Office. I mean he would find himself facing
a solid block of Sanders haters. Bernie has the entire Ruling Class
waiting to chew him up. Even his careful avoidance of any plan to
disengage from our foolish wars, will not save him. Indeed, within
days of swearing to God and All, he will be forced to stand by, while
more drones go fluttering off to the Killing Fields, the playgrounds
of Muslim children.
We can continue sacrificing our fellow men and women to the service of
this Corporate Capitalist Empire, only to watch them cave in or be
chewed up and spat out. It's the system that must be changed. We
working class folks have been frozen out of real participation for
many years...maybe forever.
But in order to form a new and more inclusive government, we will need
to figure out what to do with the one that is in our way. And sending
Bernie into the ring is not the answer. So, while I feel I have no
stake in this game, I'll vote for Bernie Sanders because it is my way
of making a small, quiet protest to the two-headed monster that keeps
all the marbles in the hands of the Ruling Class.
Carl Jarvis
On 3/24/16, Frank Ventura <frank.ventura@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Chuck, while I did vote for Sanders in the primary, I am alreadyprivate security forces guard their nicely manicured lawns.
regretting it. Sadly, Sanders is starting to sound more and more like
Jill Stein; that is someone who merely wants to derail the democratic
party and put a Republican in the oval office out of some sort of
protest. The sad truth is that after Stein and Sanders get their
jollies with their protest against the mainstream Democratic party
they will go back to their comfy suburban homes and sit back with a
glass of wine; while the rest of us working class suffer the
onslaught of President Trump or President Cruz and all the horrors
for our nation that it has brought. So a year from now when President
Trump's death squads are roaming the streets killing the working
class Bernie and Jill will be sitting back watching it all on Foxnews
while their
Frankmentality.
-----Original Message-----
From: blind-democracy-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:blind-democracy-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Charles ;
Krugman
Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2016 2:00 AM
To: blind-democracy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [blind-democracy] Re: Trump and Clinton's Big Night Poses
Hard Questions For Sanders Campaign and His Youthful Supporters
Miriam, in 2008 you voted for a typical Chicago politician. Spending
time in Chicago growing up in the sixties I found the political
machine in power fascinating. My problem is that I just don't like or
agree with Bernie Sanders and don't believe he is electable nor does
he possess the image of an American president. While There are lots
of things I didn't like about the Clinton Administration and I
believe that Hillary was an active participant in the decisionmaking
process and since I don't support the extreme principles of third
parties I feel that in this election I'm voting for the lesser of the
evils. I guess that there is still part of me that buys in to the
capitalistic
ChuckDemocrats, aside from social issues, LGBT rights, abortion rights, are
-----Original Message-----
From: Miriam Vieni
Sent: Sunday, March 20, 2016 11:43 AM
To: blind-democracy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [blind-democracy] Re: Trump and Clinton's Big Night Poses
Hard Questions For Sanders Campaign and His Youthful Supporters
I live in New York which, probably, will continue to be a blue state.
However, whatever kind of state it is, my vote, if Bernie isn't the
Democratic candidate, will go to Jill Stein. It won't go to Trump and
it won't go to the Clinton machine. In 2008, I thought I was voting
for a Democratic candidate who represented the values in which I
believed. I knew that he was a bit to the right in terms of
Afghanistan, but I tought he was a Liberal Democrat who believed in
the rule of law, in open government. I discovered that I'd voted for
an opportunist, an elitist, for a President who would ignore the
constitution whenever it got in the way of his appeasement of the
security state, of a President who was ready to cut social security
benefits, and who made unacceptable bargains with Republicans before
it was necessary to do so. And he is the more Ppogressive of the two.
If I vote for Hillary, I'd be voting for someone whose Neo Liberal
policies are more warlike, who is even more comfortable with the
elites, who will increase the US appeasement of Israel, whose concern
about African Americans is pure fiction, and who uses her femaleness
as a means to gain support from femininsts. I can't, in good
consciience do it. No, I don't want Trump as President. But the fact
that Clinton uses whatever words , she thinks, will get votes from
the Democratic base, doesn't reassure me. I listened to Robert
Sheer's discussion with Thomas Frank this morning on an audio clip on
Truthdig. Are you aware that Bill Clinton was about to privatize
social security? What stopped him? The Monica Lewinsky scandal.
These
not anymore the party of the working people.
Miriam
-----Original Message-----
From: blind-democracy-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:blind-democracy-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Charles ;
Krugman (Redacted sender "ckrugman" for DMARC)
Sent: Sunday, March 20, 2016 2:07 PM
To: blind-democracy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [blind-democracy] Re: Trump and Clinton's Big Night Poses
Hard Questions For Sanders Campaign and His Youthful Supporters
whether we might like it or not any vote that doesn't go to Hillary
including those on principle to minor candidates could very strongly
result in the trump presidency that no thinking person wants.
Chuck
-----Original Message-----
From: Miriam Vieni
Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2016 8:21 AM
To: blind-democracy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [blind-democracy] Re: Trump and Clinton's Big Night Poses
Hard Questions For Sanders Campaign and His Youthful Supporters
Well, voting for Clinton means voting for more of what we have now
which means more wealth going to the 1%, more power for trans
national corporations, larger even less regulated banks, and an
choice!Voting for trump may very well mean and out and out war at home onis unthinkable.
minorities along with what I outlined above. One can't tell what
Trump will actdually do in terms of international policy because his
statements are contradictory. I caught a short interview with the
author of a biography of Trump on NPR last night. Briefly, he said
Trump never reads books, does not focus on one subject when you talk
with him, but thinks just the way he sounds in his speeches, and his
basically and ego maniac, although he didn't use that term. I can't
visualize myself voting for Hillary because I can't think of any
positives in her favor. But certainly, the prospect of a Trump
Presidency
Party.
Miriam
Miriam
-----Original Message-----
From: blind-democracy-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:blind-democracy-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Carl ;
Jarvis
Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2016 10:27 AM
To: blind-democracy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [blind-democracy] Re: Trump and Clinton's Big Night Poses
Hard Questions For Sanders Campaign and His Youthful Supporters
As the World turns...so turn firm resolves.
Of course it's early yet, but winning the primary appears to be
slipping from the old, experienced hands of Senator Bernie Sanders.
To date I have held to my resolve to vote for Sanders, and then if he
does not win the Party nomination, to vote for Jill Stein, of the
Green
But that was before the Republicans trotted out their Party's Best,
the Clown Crew.
And, as we all guffawed and chuckled over their noisy sideshow, an
awful thing happened. One of the clowns began to look like something
out of the 1940's. A full blown Fascist!
Ranting and raving and telling one big lie after another, Donald
Trump rose like the Phoenix, out of the ashes of the Third Reich.
Despite the Republican Party's denial that he has the popular Party
support, Trump stomps about, stirring up the rank and file, and
winning in state after state.
We now are upon the brink of National disaster. One direction leads
to a Fascist State, and the other leads to a Corporate State. And we
have only ourselves to blame.
If the choice comes down to Clinton or Trump, or even Clinton or
Cruz, we will need to decide if we hold to our original plan to
support Stein, or to "throw away" our vote in an effort to block the
takeover of our emerging Corporate State by the Fascist State. What a
Just a fair warning that I am not ruling out a vote for Hillary Clinton.integrity.
Carl Jarvis
On 3/16/16, Miriam Vieni <miriamvieni@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Published on Alternet (http://www.alternet.org) Home > Trump and
Clinton's Big Night Poses Hard Questions For Sanders Campaign and
His Youthful Supporters ________________________________________
Trump and Clinton's Big Night Poses Hard Questions For Sanders
Campaign and His Youthful Supporters By Steven Rosenfeld [1] /
AlterNet [2] March 15, 2016 Bernie Sanders' historic and
expectation-surpassing bid for the Democratic presidential
nomination ran into hard reality in several pivotal primary contests
Tuesday, where he could not break Hillary Clinton's hold on voters
in several critical battleground states needed to win in the
fall-notably Ohio and Florida.
While Sanders supporters will point to his narrow victory in
Missouri, and overwhelming support among independents who voted in
the Democratic primary, Clinton's victories in those fall
battleground states-as well as South Carolina and Illinois-means
that it is virtually impossible for Sanders to win the delegates
needed [3] for the party's nomination. That fact undoubtedly will
take days to seep into his remarkable grassroots campaign, where it
remains to be seen how Sanders will continue his quest or align
himself with Clinton-who he's criticized for some stances but
praised as a person of
integrity.The backdrop for that as-yet unknown calculation is the deeplyTrump.
disconcerting continuing rise of Donald Trump toward the Republican
nomination, who has continued to amass a delegate lead-winning in
Florida, Illinois, South Carolina and Missouri. Although Ohio Gov.
John Kasich beat Trump in his home state, his first victory on 2016,
his chances-based on the GOP's delegate nomination math-are an even
longer shot than Sanders catching up with Clinton and wresting the
nomination. Under the current Republican National Committee rules, a
candidate needs to have won at least eight states to have their name
placed in nomination for the presidency. That renders Kasich's
pledge to supporters that he will win this fall as little more than
campaign magical thinking.
"Only one campaign has beaten Donald Trump over and over and over
again,"
said Sen. Ted Cruz, also striking a defiant tone despite losing in
every state Tuesday, including by several thousand votes in Missouri
to
Cruz recited his pledge to recast the federal government andTuesday's results.
judiciary in the most ideological right-wing mold possible, go after
enemies abroad, and said he was the only alternative to Trump.
"Starting tomorrow morning, there is a clear choice," Cruz said,
posturing before supporters in Texas.
Trump's victory in Florida prompted Marco Rubio to suspend his
campaign, telling his backers that it was not in "God's plans" for
him to win "in
2016
or maybe ever." He also implored Republicans to reject the hateful
politics pedaled by Trump, saying, "I ask the American people, 'Do
not give into the fear. Do not give into the frustration.'"
Tuesday's top two storylines-Trump's rise and Clinton all-but ending
Sanders' chances of winning sufficient delegates to be the
nominee-came together in her remarks, where she underscored that she
had won fair and square but tried to reach out to Sanders' team.
"Our campaign has won more votes than any other campaign-Democrat or
Republican," began Clinton, in remarks from Palm Beach, "and I want
to congratulate Sen. Sanders for the vigorous campaign he has waged."
Clinton said she needed the support of Democrats across the country,
and then focused on Trump but cited many issues raised by Sanders.
"Tonight, it is clearer than ever that this may be one of the most
consequential campaigns of our lifetimes," she said. "The next
president will walk into the oval office next year in January, and
sit down at that desk, and start making decisions that will affect
the lives and the livelihoods of everyone in this country and
indeed, everyone on this planet."
Clinton said the next president has three major challenges: making
positive differences in people's lives, keeping America safe and
bringing the country together. The first example she gave was a
direct nod to Sanders and his popularity with voters under age 35.
"Young people across America struggling under the weight of student
debt find it difficult to imagine the futures they want," she said,
"and they deserve a president who will relieve them of that burden
and help future generations go to college without borrowing a dime."
Clinton continued with another issue that he raised first. "And you
know grandparents who worry about retirement deserve a president who
will protect and then expand Social Security for those who need it
most-not cut or privatize it."
Her to-do list continued: affordable child care; paid family leave;
equal pay for equal work for women; good jobs with rising incomes-in
construction, manufacturing, small business and renewable energy;
standing up for workers and the middle class-"not China, not Wall
Street and not overpaid corporate executives." She said that she
knows how to make these promises become realities, and then slammed
Trump, especially his anti-immigrant and anti-Muslim stances, and
his embrace of torture and threatening adversaries.
"That doesn't make him strong, it makes him wrong," she said.
"We have to take on all forms of inequality and discrimination,"
Clinton said. "Together, we have to defend all of our rights-civil
rights and voting rights; worker's rights and women's rights; LGBT
rights and rights for people with disabilities. And that starts with
standing with President Obama when he nominates a justice to the
Supreme Court."
Whether or not Sanders' supporters will buy Clinton's words and see
how much he has sharpened her embrace and articulation of a
progressive agenda remains to be seen. There is no doubt that the
short-term messaging from the Sanders' campaign will be that they
will keep plowing ahead and fight for delegates in the remaining
states. As of Tuesday, half the states have voted. The math has
Clinton with 300 more [3] pledged delegates than Sanders. That is
not counting super-delegates, the elected officers and party
officials, where she has 427 to his 26 [3]. Sanders reportedly spent
$12 million in ads for Tuesday's contests, compared to Clinton's $7
million.
Many of Sanders' supporters have not been involved in political
campaigns before, and will have a hard time immediately processing
But there are some big unanswered questions about what is next fortogether.
them in 2016-and what Clinton will also do to bring these two
campaigns
Sanders has taken positions that appeal to the disaffected votersCitizen's Guide to Voting"
who have been drawn in by Trump and Cruz. One can only hope that the
Democratic Party knows it will need the millions of young economic
progressives to turn out in November. And they may not unless they
have a candidate they can believe in.
Steven Rosenfeld covers national political issues for AlterNet,
including America's retirement crisis, democracy and voting rights,
and campaigns and elections. He is the author of "Count My Vote: A
(AlterNet Books, 2008).
Share on Facebook Share
Share on Twitter Tweet
Report typos and corrections to 'corrections@xxxxxxxxxxxx'. [4]
[5]
________________________________________
Source URL:
http://www.alternet.org/election-2016/trump-and-clintons-big-night-p
o s es-har d-questions-sanders-campaign-and-his-youthful
Links:
[1] http://www.alternet.org/authors/steven-rosenfeld
[2] http://alternet.org
[3]
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/us/elections/primary-calenda
r
-
and-re
sults.html?action=click&contentCollection=Election%202016&re
g
i
on=Foo
ter&module=WhatsNext&version=WhatsNext&contentID=WhatsNe
x t &m oduleDetail=undefined&pgtype=Multimedia
[4] mailto:corrections@xxxxxxxxxxxx?Subject=Typo on Trump and ;
Clinton's Big Night Poses Hard Questions For Sanders Campaign and
His Youthful Supporters [5] http://www.alternet.org/ [6] ;
http://www.alternet.org/%2Bnew_src%2B
Published on Alternet (http://www.alternet.org) Home > Trump and
Clinton's Big Night Poses Hard Questions For Sanders Campaign and
His Youthful Supporters
Trump and Clinton's Big Night Poses Hard Questions For Sanders
Campaign and His Youthful Supporters By Steven Rosenfeld [1] /
AlterNet [2] March 15, 2016 Bernie Sanders' historic and
expectation-surpassing bid for the Democratic presidential
nomination ran into hard reality in several pivotal primary contests
Tuesday, where he could not break Hillary Clinton's hold on voters
in several critical battleground states needed to win in the
fall-notably Ohio and Florida.
While Sanders supporters will point to his narrow victory in
Missouri, and overwhelming support among independents who voted in
the Democratic primary, Clinton's victories in those fall
battleground states-as well as South Carolina and Illinois-means
that it is virtually impossible for Sanders to win the delegates
needed [3] for the party's nomination. That fact undoubtedly will
take days to seep into his remarkable grassroots campaign, where it
remains to be seen how Sanders will continue his quest or align
himself with Clinton-who he's criticized for some stances but
praised as a person of
The backdrop for that as-yet unknown calculation is the deeplyTrump.
disconcerting continuing rise of Donald Trump toward the Republican
nomination, who has continued to amass a delegate lead-winning in
Florida, Illinois, South Carolina and Missouri. Although Ohio Gov.
John Kasich beat Trump in his home state, his first victory on 2016,
his chances-based on the GOP's delegate nomination math-are an even
longer shot than Sanders catching up with Clinton and wresting the
nomination. Under the current Republican National Committee rules, a
candidate needs to have won at least eight states to have their name
placed in nomination for the presidency. That renders Kasich's
pledge to supporters that he will win this fall as little more than
campaign magical thinking.
"Only one campaign has beaten Donald Trump over and over and over
again,"
said Sen. Ted Cruz, also striking a defiant tone despite losing in
every state Tuesday, including by several thousand votes in Missouri
to
Cruz recited his pledge to recast the federal government andTuesday's results.
judiciary in the most ideological right-wing mold possible, go after
enemies abroad, and said he was the only alternative to Trump.
"Starting tomorrow morning, there is a clear choice," Cruz said,
posturing before supporters in Texas.
Trump's victory in Florida prompted Marco Rubio to suspend his
campaign, telling his backers that it was not in "God's plans" for
him to win "in
2016
or maybe ever." He also implored Republicans to reject the hateful
politics pedaled by Trump, saying, "I ask the American people, 'Do
not give into the fear. Do not give into the frustration.'"
Tuesday's top two storylines-Trump's rise and Clinton all-but ending
Sanders' chances of winning sufficient delegates to be the
nominee-came together in her remarks, where she underscored that she
had won fair and square but tried to reach out to Sanders' team.
"Our campaign has won more votes than any other campaign-Democrat or
Republican," began Clinton, in remarks from Palm Beach, "and I want
to congratulate Sen. Sanders for the vigorous campaign he has waged."
Clinton said she needed the support of Democrats across the country,
and then focused on Trump but cited many issues raised by Sanders.
"Tonight, it is clearer than ever that this may be one of the most
consequential campaigns of our lifetimes," she said. "The next
president will walk into the oval office next year in January, and
sit down at that desk, and start making decisions that will affect
the lives and the livelihoods of everyone in this country and
indeed, everyone on this planet."
Clinton said the next president has three major challenges: making
positive differences in people's lives, keeping America safe and
bringing the country together. The first example she gave was a
direct nod to Sanders and his popularity with voters under age 35.
"Young people across America struggling under the weight of student
debt find it difficult to imagine the futures they want," she said,
"and they deserve a president who will relieve them of that burden
and help future generations go to college without borrowing a dime."
Clinton continued with another issue that he raised first. "And you
know grandparents who worry about retirement deserve a president who
will protect and then expand Social Security for those who need it
most-not cut or privatize it."
Her to-do list continued: affordable child care; paid family leave;
equal pay for equal work for women; good jobs with rising incomes-in
construction, manufacturing, small business and renewable energy;
standing up for workers and the middle class-"not China, not Wall
Street and not overpaid corporate executives." She said that she
knows how to make these promises become realities, and then slammed
Trump, especially his anti-immigrant and anti-Muslim stances, and
his embrace of torture and threatening adversaries.
"That doesn't make him strong, it makes him wrong," she said.
"We have to take on all forms of inequality and discrimination,"
Clinton said. "Together, we have to defend all of our rights-civil
rights and voting rights; worker's rights and women's rights; LGBT
rights and rights for people with disabilities. And that starts with
standing with President Obama when he nominates a justice to the
Supreme Court."
Whether or not Sanders' supporters will buy Clinton's words and see
how much he has sharpened her embrace and articulation of a
progressive agenda remains to be seen. There is no doubt that the
short-term messaging from the Sanders' campaign will be that they
will keep plowing ahead and fight for delegates in the remaining
states. As of Tuesday, half the states have voted. The math has
Clinton with 300 more [3] pledged delegates than Sanders. That is
not counting super-delegates, the elected officers and party
officials, where she has 427 to his 26 [3]. Sanders reportedly spent
$12 million in ads for Tuesday's contests, compared to Clinton's $7
million.
Many of Sanders' supporters have not been involved in political
campaigns before, and will have a hard time immediately processing
But there are some big unanswered questions about what is next fortogether.
them in 2016-and what Clinton will also do to bring these two
campaigns
Sanders has taken positions that appeal to the disaffected votersCitizen's Guide to Voting"
who have been drawn in by Trump and Cruz. One can only hope that the
Democratic Party knows it will need the millions of young economic
progressives to turn out in November. And they may not unless they
have a candidate they can believe in.
Steven Rosenfeld covers national political issues for AlterNet,
including America's retirement crisis, democracy and voting rights,
and campaigns and elections. He is the author of "Count My Vote: A
(AlterNet Books, 2008).
Error! Hyperlink reference not valid.
Error! Hyperlink reference not valid.
Report typos and corrections to 'corrections@xxxxxxxxxxxx'. [4] Error!
Hyperlink reference not valid.[5]
Source URL:
http://www.alternet.org/election-2016/trump-and-clintons-big-night-p
o s es-har d-questions-sanders-campaign-and-his-youthful
Links:
[1] http://www.alternet.org/authors/steven-rosenfeld
[2] http://alternet.org
[3]
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/us/elections/primary-calenda
r
-
and-re
sults.html?action=click&contentCollection=Election%202016&re
g
i
on=Foo
ter&module=WhatsNext&version=WhatsNext&contentID=WhatsNe
x t &m oduleDetail=undefined&pgtype=Multimedia
[4] mailto:corrections@xxxxxxxxxxxx?Subject=Typo on Trump and ;
Clinton's Big Night Poses Hard Questions For Sanders Campaign and
His Youthful Supporters [5] http://www.alternet.org/ [6] ;
http://www.alternet.org/%2Bnew_src%2B
