The Heir Jernigan mentality isn't too far removed from what some blind people
still believe today.
-----Original Message-----
From: blind-democracy-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:blind-democracy-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Carl Jarvis
Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2017 12:04 PM
To: blind-democracy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [blind-democracy] Re: Thousands in Puerto Rico protest anti-labor
measures
Back in the 70's, when I was active in the NFB, president Jernigan sent out the
word that if we were invited to a conference as a speaker, and we found that a
member of the ACB had also been invited to speak, we were to decline. Here in
Washington State, we ignored that policy.
One year there was an effort to force parents of disabled children in
Washington State, to foot the bill for any costs in the child's education that
exceeded the normal allotted dollars. This meant that costs such as tutors,
therapists, housing, meals, and care givers during school session, were not
covered by the State.
A call went out to all organizations of disabled people. Our Board of
Directors met and decided that we would send a number of members to testify
against this bill. President Jernigan got wind of our decision. He called me
and told me that we were not to involve ourselves in this battle. He said he
had a contact in the Washington State senate who told him that this bill was
going to pass. Jernigan told me that it would go against future efforts by our
organization to secure support for legislation affecting the Blind, if we spoke
against the bill.
I called a special meeting of our Board and presented Jernigan's position and
his demand. The Board members debated this and decided that this was not an
issue that involved our National Organization.
In fact, and I give great credit to our Board, members felt angry over what
they saw as meddling by Jernigan.
We had three members attend the hearing on this bill. The building was crammed
to the point that our delegation could not even get to the front door to sign
up to speak. This overflow was in spite of the efforts of the legislature to
discourage attendance, by moving, at the last minute, the hearing to a late
evening in the middle of the week.
There was so much opposition to that bill that it never came out of committee.
But I never forgave Kenneth Jernigan for his perception of what was good for
blind people.
Think of it! A leader of a small minority who is willing to keep his people
separated from other minorities in order to receive crumbs from the Master's
table.
Jernigan told me on more than one occasion that the Blind were such a minority
that we were ignored by larger organizations of other disabled, such as
Developmentally Delayed, or Paraplegic. For this reason he believed we were
better off staying separate. While there was certainly merit to what he said,
it always bothered me that Jernigan accepted that we could not hold our own
within the disabled community, but we could make an independent stand and win
over the sighted world.
After over 48 years in the Organized Blind Struggle, we have made very little
inroads into public attitudes about what is seen as the tragedy of blindness.
Today's NFB is functioning more as a national agency of the blind instead of
the grass roots movement dreamed of by Jacobus tenBroek.
Carl Jarvis
On 2/21/17, joe harcz Comcast <joeharcz@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I think that is very often true today.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Miriam Vieni" <miriamvieni@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <blind-democracy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, February 20, 2017 1:41 PM
Subject: [blind-democracy] Re: Thousands in Puerto Rico protest
anti-labor measures
Carl,
1. There was huge prejudice against Puerto Ricans in New York City in
the 40's and 50's. Well, even after that. I saw it in Levittown in
the 60's as
well.
2. The blind people with whom I came into contact in New York, were
concerned only about prejudice and discrimination against themselves.
Their
concern did not extend to others, not even people with other disabilities.
Miriam
-----Original Message-----
From: blind-democracy-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:blind-democracy-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Carl Jarvis
Sent: Monday, February 20, 2017 11:39 AM
To: blind-democracy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [blind-democracy] Re: Thousands in Puerto Rico protest
anti-labor measures
Absolutely correct, Miriam. This Freedom Loving country of ours has
been exploiting Puerto Rico since the Spanish American War.
One of my coworkers, a Vocational Rehab Counselor, legally blind, was
born and raised in New York City. He hated Puerto Ricans. He
believed they came
into "our country" and took all the jobs away from the long time citizens.
He referred to them as "Monkeys". I argued with him over the years,
trying
to get across that his prejudice was no different than the general
prejudice
against blind people, which he worked diligently to eliminate.
But he had a secure job and a decent paycheck, and a White Skin. He
waved that White Card around my face until I was ready to ring his White Neck.
I came to believe, rightly or wrongly, that this man's concern for the
rights of blind people was nothing more than a facade from behind
which he hid his real elitist beliefs. His job demanded that he
promote the equal rights of the blind, but he never stood up for any
other minority whose rights were being trampled.
Despite being a Racist and a Womanizer, this VRC had an outstanding
record for placement of his clients in decent employment. Looking
back later, I can't recall him placing any non white clients in competitive
employment.
The few he did place were at the Light House for the Blind, a very low
paying sheltered workshop at that time.
This VRC was not alone. We sometimes ignore that we are a Racist
People, well practiced in hiding that fact from ourselves while going
about exploiting People of Color.
Back when I was president of the Washington State Association of the
Blind,
I would remind members over and over that if we discriminated based on
Color, we were not Blind enough to be members. "Fighting for equal
rights means that we are color blind", I repeated.
One time, during our 7 long year struggle to establish a Commission
for the
Blind, we had organized 100 people to travel to Olympia and testify on
behalf of a separate agency.
Volunteer drivers loaded their cars and headed to the state Capitol.
As the last car was loading, a woman came to me and asked to ride in a
different car. "I won't ride in that car," she told me, "The driver
is a Colored Man". I was stunned to believe that this woman would
turn down a ride with a person who was taking their own time to drive
people so they could demonstrate for equal rights. But I didn't have
time or experience enough to sit her down and point out the
contradiction. "That's the only seat left. Take it or leave it," I
snapped. She screamed some obscenities
and refused to ride. And by the way, she never came to another meeting.
When it comes to standing up for the Rights of All People, my mother
said it
right, "We just do our crumby best."
Carl Jarvis
On 2/20/17, Miriam Vieni <miriamvieni@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I would make a slight correction. The assault on Puerto Rico began
long before Trump came into the picture and the coup de gras was
delivered during Obama's administration.
Miriam
-----Original Message-----
From: blind-democracy-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:blind-democracy-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Carl ;
Jarvis
Sent: Sunday, February 19, 2017 11:29 PM
To: blind-democracy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [blind-democracy] Re: Thousands in Puerto Rico protest
anti-labor measures
Puerto Rico is the canary in the cage, used in coal mines to warn
workers when toxic gases are building up.
The message from Puerto Rico is a warning that the desecration and
plunder being heaped upon that hapless country, is a foretaste of
what is waiting for our 50 states.
There is a reason why the plight of Puerto Rico is not a feature
story. It is simply a test to see if the Corporations can pull it
off. So far they are on track to mount an all out attack on the
working class people, headed by the Trump Machine.
Carl Jarvis
On 2/19/17, Roger Loran Bailey <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
http://themilitant.com/2017/8108/810852.html
The Militant (logo)
Vol. 81/No. 8 February 27, 2017
Thousands in Puerto Rico protest anti-labor measures
BY SETH GALINSKY
“The economic situation was already pretty difficult before the
government’s most recent measures,” Ivan Vargas, a worker at Puerto
Rico’s Water and Sewage Authority, said in a phone interview from
Mayagüez, Puerto Rico, Feb. 13.
Vargas was one of thousands of workers who marched in San Juan Feb.
9 to protest the government’s anti-labor moves outside the annual
meeting of the Association of Industrialists of Puerto Rico, which
was attended by representatives of the island’s colonial government
and Washington’s Financial Oversight and Management Board for Puerto
Rico.
“Many of my co-workers are temporary workers. Some of them are only
getting the federal minimum wage of $7.25 an hour and minimum benefits,”
Vargas said. “Little by little, they are quitting and heading to the
United States.”
One of the largest contingents at the march was from the Authentic
Independent Union at the water authority. More than two dozen unions
joined the action.
Since taking office in January, Gov. Ricardo Rosselló has pushed
through laws and executive orders to meet the demands of the
bipartisan Financial Oversight Board, appointed by then President
Barack Obama to ensure payment to wealthy bondholders of some $70
billion owed by the U.S. colony’s government agencies.
Under the Labor Transformation and Flexibilization Law adopted in
January, employers are allowed to increase the probation period for
new workers from 90 days to either nine or 12 months. The law cuts
the Christmas bonus by 50 percent for those with less than one year
seniority, raises the minimum number of hours needed to qualify for
vacations and sick pay from 115 to 130 hours a month, and allows
bosses to force employees to work on Sundays without paying overtime.
To sweeten the attack on labor, the law increases paternity leave
from five to 15 days for some workers. Rosselló claims the law will
save the government $100 million a year.
Rosselló also signed a law to allow the government to privatize
additional public services, and instructed all government agencies
to cut expenses by 10 percent.
This is on top of measures by previous governments that laid off
thousands of workers, cut pensions and increased taxes on working
people.
“The labor reform is disastrous for working people,” said José
Rodríguez Vélez, president of the Union Solidarity Movement (MSS),
by phone from San Juan. The MSS organizes workers at the Coca Cola
and Pepsi bottling plants and at La India brewery. “What the
government is trying to do is create divisions in the working class.”
“Before the new law, workers received time and a half after eight
hours in a day, now they don’t get it until they’ve worked 40 hours
a week,”
Pedro Irene Maymí, president of the Authentic Independent Union,
told the Militant from San Juan. One measure states that all
government agencies are under “one sole employer.” This means “they
can move workers from one agency to another. Workers will lose their
seniority rights,” Maymí said.
“The government claims the law will create more jobs,” he added.
“That’s just a pretext to eliminate the benefits and protections
that workers have.”
Junta threatens to use ‘many tools’
The fiscal board, also called the junta, has been pushing Rosselló
to make deeper cuts. In a Feb. 2 letter, Financial Oversight Board
Chair José Carrión warned the governor that the junta has “many
tools it can deploy” if it doesn’t get what it wants. Among its powers:
criminal charges against anyone who doesn’t cooperate.
One of the junta’s demands is a 10 percent cut in pensions to save
$200 million. Pensions on the island average $1,100 a month, but
more than
38,000 retired government workers only get $500.
The Puerto Rican economy has contracted 18 percent since a recession
began in 2006. The latest figures show an even further decline over
the last year, including an 8.9 percent drop in workers employed in
manufacturing, a 13.6 percent drop in cement sales, and a 3.1
percent drop in the number of hours worked.
More protests are planned. Students at the University of Puerto Rico
are holding assemblies on campuses across the island to organize
against proposed cuts in the university budget and steep increases
in tuition.
Unions are organizing protests for March 8, International Women’s
Day, and for May Day.
Many workers are buoyed by the return of independence fighter Oscar
López Rivera to Puerto Rico, although he remains under house arrest.
López will make his first public appearance on May 17 when his
commuted sentence ends.
“I heard about his return during the demonstration,” water worker
Vargas said. “I’ve read a lot about him. He was imprisoned for his
beliefs. But not all my co-workers agree.”
“I tell them what I think. And that he is being freed because of
pressure not just here but internationally. There’s no going back.”
Related articles:
Oscar López back in Puerto Rico! Faces restrictions until May 17
Front page (for this issue) | Home | Text-version home
