These Are the Corporations Behind Trump's Muslim Ban
Activists, wearing orange prison jumpsuits with the Chase Bank logo, rally
against financial institutions' support of private prisons and immigrant
detention centers, as part of a May Day protest near Wall Street in Lower
Manhattan on May 1, 2018, in New York City.
Drew Angerer / Getty Images
By Saqib Bhatti & Molly Gott, In These Times Published July 27, 2018
Last month, the US Supreme Court officially gave its seal of approval to
discrimination against Muslims by upholding President Trump's Muslim ban.
With all three branches of the federal government now apparently united in
their anti-Muslim animus, it is clearer than ever that we cannot wait for
our public officials to see the folly of their ways and right this wrong.
That is why on June 29th, we at the Action Center on Race and the Economy
(ACRE) and LittleSis released a report, Ban Them: Taking on the Corporations
Behind the Muslim Ban, which looks at the companies that either directly
profit off anti-Muslim and anti-immigrant policies or that finance the
politicians who support these policies. Our goal is to inspire campaigns
that force these companies to stop promoting Islamophobia.
When we think of anti-Muslim corporations, organizations like Breitbart News
and News Corp may come to mind. However, these companies make for poor
targets because hate- and fearmongering are a core part of their business
models. Similarly, defense contractors like Halliburton, Blackwater and
Caterpillar - as well as Big Oil companies like ExxonMobil and BP - depend
on war in Muslim-majority countries for their profits. They need a large
portion of Americans to view Muslims as the enemy in order to survive and
thrive. This also makes them imperfect targets.
However, there is a different set of companies - companies whose executives
are brand-sensitive and want to appear cosmopolitan and multicultural, many
of whom count large numbers of Muslims among their customers, but who
nevertheless help prop up Islamophobia and our brutal anti-immigrant regime.
This includes, for example, corporations who are major donors to anti-Muslim
politicians like Rep. Steve King from Iowa and Senate Majority Leader Mitch
McConnell. It also includes companies that profit from and enable immigrant
detention, incarceration and surveillance.
Don't miss a beat
Get the latest news and thought-provoking analysis from Truthout.
Companies That Support Anti-Muslim Politicians
Rep. King may well be the most racist member of Congress. He is certainly
the most anti-Muslim. Just last month, he encouraged meat-packing plants in
his district to discriminate against Muslim workers. Last year, King tweeted
out an endorsement of the far-right Dutch politician Geert Wilders, who has
compared the Qur'an to Hitler's Mein Kampf, writing, "Wilders understands
that culture and demographics are our destiny. We can't restore our
civilization with somebody else's babies."
It is not a stretch to say that Senator Mitch McConnell gave us the Muslim
ban. McConnell masterminded the theft of Obama's Supreme Court pick by
refusing to schedule hearings for Merrick Garland and made it possible for
Trump to appoint Neil Gorsuch to the bench, which gave Trump the fifth vote
he needed to uphold the ban.
Both King and McConnell receive major funding from Wall Street. Over the
course of King's political career, his second biggest campaign donor has
been the American Bankers Association (ABA), the leading industry
association of big banks like Wells Fargo, JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America,
Citigroup, US Bank and Goldman Sachs. JPMorgan Chase and Bank of America
both have representatives on the ABA's board.
The ABA gets its money from its member banks, and banks often rely on the
ABA to do their lobbying and push their agenda without getting their own
hands dirty. All of these banks are indirectly funding Steve King. Warren
Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway is another one of King's top campaign
contributors. Berkshire Hathaway is the largest shareholder in both Wells
Fargo and Bank of America and a major shareholder in Goldman Sachs and US
Bancorp (the parent company of US Bank).
The Blackstone Group, the world's largest private equity firm and a Wall
Street giant, is McConnell's top donor. Blackstone's investments include
companies like Versace, Crocs, Motel 6 and Michaels craft stores. Blackstone
CEO Stephen Schwarzman was also the Chairman of Trump's business council
before it disbanded. Citigroup, JPMorgan Chase, Goldman Sachs, and the Swiss
bank UBS are also among McConnell's top campaign contributors, as is Elliott
Management, the hedge fund run by Paul Singer. All of these companies are
complicit in the theft of Obama's Supreme Court pick, which has given us the
conservative majority we now have today.
One company that is on the list of both King and McConnell's top donors is
AT&T. Even though thousands of American Muslims are AT&T customers, by
giving so much money to these anti-Muslim politicians, the company is
actually a leader in promoting discrimination against Muslims in the United
States. AT&T also has a history of discriminating against Muslims in its own
workforce. In 2012, a jury awarded a Muslim former AT&T worker a $5 million
award over punitive damages.
Some of these corporations may claim that they only contribute to a
politician because they support their regulatory policies and not their
xenophobic ones. However, once they are in office, these politicians are
pushing a racist agenda, so any corporation that helps catapult them into
office is complicit in their Islamophobia and white supremacy.
Companies Profiting From Trump's Immigration Policies
The role of anti-Muslim fervor and Islamophobia in the immigration debate
cannot be overstated. It is immigrants and refugees from Muslim-majority
countries that are the most directly affected by Trump's Muslim ban. It is
also important to remember that ICE was first created after 9/11 as part of
the Bush Administration's efforts to clamp down on immigrants from
Muslim-majority countries as part of the so-called War on Terror.
The same zero-tolerance immigration policies that are separating families at
the Southern border are also separating Muslim families, and the Muslim ban
is a part of that framework. The same detention centers that are used to
lock up migrants from Latin America are also used to lock up Muslim
immigrants. This means that the companies that are profiting from Trump's
immigration policies are also all responsible for creating a culture of
Islamophobia in this country.
As of March, 71 percent of immigrant detention beds in the United States
were run by private prison companies. The two largest private prison
companies in the world - which control a large portion of these beds - are
GEO Group and CoreCivic. Although demanding that these private prison
companies stop locking up people of color is also akin to asking someone to
stop breathing, there are other companies that enable these immigrant
detention profiteers that are more susceptible to public pressure.
A slew of big banks provide financing to and are major investors in these
private prison companies. A 2016 report from In The Public Interest
identified six banks as the primary financiers of GEO and CoreCivic: Wells
Fargo, Bank of America, JPMorgan Chase, BNP Paribas (which owns Bank of the
West and is the largest investor in First Hawaiian Bank), SunTrust and US
Bancorp. As of 2016, both companies had $900 million in lines of credit from
this consortium of banks. Wells Fargo stands out, as it served as the
largest underwriter of corporate bonds for both GEO and CoreCivic. Wells
Fargo has been one of the top shareholders in GEO in the past, and the bank
still has over $16 million invested in CoreCivic and $10 million invested in
GEO.
It's not just private prison companies that are partnering with ICE to
enforce our brutal immigration policies. In the wake of the public outcry
over the Trump administration's policy of separating children from their
parents who are detained at the US-Mexico border, tech companies have also
come under scrutiny for their contracts with ICE. These companies provide a
wide variety of hardware, services and infrastructure to the agency,
including systems for tracking immigrants, mobile radio communications and
tactical communications programs, and facial recognition software.
At Microsoft, employees are calling on the company to cancel its $19.4
million contract with ICE for processing data and artificial intelligence
capabilities. In a January blog post, Microsoft said it was offering cloud
services to ICE and was "proud" of the work. The company said the services
could "help employees make more informed decisions faster," such as
"enabling them to process data on edge devices or utilize deep learning
capabilities to accelerate facial recognition and identification."
Holding Anti-Muslim Companies Accountable
Even though they don't openly flirt with Neo-Nazis the way Breitbart does,
and are not bent on "eliminating Muslims and the Islamic faith from the
globe" the way Blackwater is, companies like Wells Fargo, AT&T and Microsoft
are all complicit in the culture of Islamophobia that has emboldened Trump,
McConnell and the Supreme Court to cement discrimination against Muslims
into law. Whether their attacks on Muslims are direct or indirect, and
whether their interests in doing so are ideological or economic, all of
these companies are partly responsible for the Muslim ban.
With legal and legislative avenues for challenging the Muslim ban closed for
now, we need to broaden the fight. While it is important to hold our public
officials accountable for their role in promoting the Muslim ban, we cannot
stop there. We also need to take on these corporations directly and make
them pay a price for enabling, supporting and profiting from anti-Muslim and
anti-immigrant policies.
