Dennis J. Bernstein wraps up his article by writing, "...there are
billionaires and ballot
bandits ready to snatch the 2016 election. This is not a partisan matter,
it’s a civil rights matter. So come, we’ll have some fun, eat some popcorn
watching the dissolution of that thing that used to be called American
democracy."
Well, break out the popcorn and the Ruffles and dip, the dye is cast
and the deed is done. In most elections there is only one winner.
But in our upcoming Presidential debacle there will be no loser.
What, you say, no loser? But there are two candidates running for the
office. One is sure to win and the other will lose.
Not so, my fuzzy headed little cherubs. Since there is only one
Corporate Establishment, and it owns both major candidates, there can
be no loser, so far as the Empire's needs are concerned.
And by the way, just so someone doesn't point it out to me, I know
that there are more than two candidates running for the Big Brass
Ring. But that's another part of the "no loser" story. The Empire
has so thoroughly isolated any aspirations of the multitude of
"lesser" Parties, that they appear on ballots in order to provide
comic relief. But just as an aside, I predict that the presidential
election of 2016 will show a doubling of votes cast for Jill Stein.
Not enough to mount an uprising on, but a quiet warning to the Empire
that its days are numbered.
Carl Jarvis
On 7/12/16, Miriam Vieni <miriamvieni@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Excerpt: "Hillary Clinton has been given the official all-clear by the FBI,
who have said she won't have to face charges for the Clorox cleaning job
she
did on her email server. And with her path to power given the personal red
carpet treatment by FBI director James Comey, the fact that a hundred
thousand votes or so have yet to be counted in California has been swept
under the high thread count rug."
Former secretary of state Hillary Clinton and her husband former president
Bill Clinton wait to go on stage at the Story County Democratic Picnic in
Ames, Iowa, November 15, 2015. (photo: Melina Mara/WP)
The Clintons & a Crime Far Worse Than Missing Emails or Votes!
By Dennis J Bernstein and Greg Palast, Reader Supported News
12 July 16
It’s been an action-packed week in politics. Hillary Clinton has been given
the official all-clear by the FBI, who have said she won’t have to face
charges for the Clorox cleaning job she did on her email server. And with
her path to power given the personal red carpet treatment by FBI director
James Comey, the fact that a hundred thousand votes or so have yet to be
counted in California has been swept under the high thread count rug —
where
a lot of inconvenient votes end up these days! But the missing emails and
votes haven’t been forgotten by our resident sleuth, Greg Palast. In this
week’s Best Democracy Money Can Buy: Election Crimes Bulletin, he gives
Dennis J Bernstein the skinny on Sanders’ stolen California win, Clinton’s
bleached communications — and a multi-million dollar Kazakhstan bribery and
corruption scandal that got Cloroxed with them!
TRANSCRIPT (Originally broadcast on July 6, 2016)
Dennis Bernstein: There has been a lot going on. We’ve got the announcement
today that Hillary Clinton will not be indicted, after a little visit that
Bill had with the Attorney General. There are still some leftover results
that we’re trying to figure out in terms of what happened in California.
And
you’ve got a big event coming up. So there’s a lot to talk about. Why don’t
we start back in California?
Greg Palast: Well, I was reading something called The Washington Post,
which
is like the American Izvestia, and it said, “Greg Palast made a mistake.”
Because I had announced on your show — we’re infamous now — that 2 million
ballots were not counted when they declared Hillary Clinton the winner in
California with 100% of precincts reporting. In fact, there were 2 million
ballots that were uncounted, according to the Secretary of State, on the
night that CNN announced that 100% of the results were in. And that doesn’t
change, even if The Washington Post doubts it.
Even today, one month after the primary, over 100,000 ballots have yet to
be
counted — provisional ballots, what we call placebo ballots, which have a
danger of not being counted at all. I was also attacked in The Washington
Post — I’m not being defensive about this, I just want to correct the
record
— because I said on this show that the majority of the provisional ballots
were, given the demographics, likely Bernie Sanders voters. And I was
accused of being The Great Carnac and knowing how people voted without
seeing their ballots. No, it was demographics. In fact, of the provisional
ballots that have now been counted, exactly 75.0%, 3 out of 4 ballots, went
for Bernie Sanders.
What is a provisional ballot? … I call them placebo ballots, because they
make you think you voted when you haven’t. They let you believe you voted …
There’s a one in three chance it won’t be counted. In a high risk race, a
majority chance it will not be counted … There’s likely to be 3 million
given out in the upcoming election — far more than the margins of victory.
Supposedly Hillary Clinton initially won in California by 400,000 votes.
That margin has officially shrunk substantially. But the margin is far, far
less than the number of provisional ballots that have been given out, and,
as I projected, 75% of those that get counted go to Sanders. If you count
all the provisional ballots, all things equal, Bernie Sanders won.
DB: Well, that begs my next question: how long do you have to wait for a
vote count before it becomes irrelevant? Like how long does it take them to
count the votes to figure out what happened in Britain?
Palast: Let’s see, by 5 a.m. British time they’d counted 37 million ballots
… In California, we were waiting one month. This is Silicon Valley country,
right, and we cannot figure out how to count a bunch of pieces of paper in
over a month. Part of it is, they’re not trying to figure out how to count
these things — that’s easy. They’re trying to figure out how not to count
them. How many they can cut out, reject, and throw in the garbage … This is
the problem here. We are not counting all the ballots in the United States.
That’s why it takes so long, over a month in California, as they figure out
how many ballots they don’t want to count — that’s ugly. And when it gets
down to the rest of the nation, the racist smell of the ballot rejection is
heavy … If a ballot is thrown away as non-countable, the U.S. Civil Rights
Commission says it’s 900% more likely that voter is black than white. It’s
an apartheid vote-counting system. Everyone in America gets to vote, but
not
every color gets to have their vote counted.
DB: Well, big announcement, Hillary Clinton is not going to be indicted, at
least according to the FBI … But what does this have to do with voter
protection? This is not about one candidate or another, but this is an
important story, isn’t it?
Palast: Very. Because people know me as the guy who’s the author of The
Best
Democracy Money Can Buy and Billionaires & Ballot Bandits. And there’s a
direct relation between vote-rustling and billionaires buying up our
politics … I’m not partisan on that. Hillary Clinton’s e-mails, they
discovered that she was basically hiding them because there were Freedom of
Information Act requests for her documents from journalists like me. What
they wanted to do is tell us that these e-mails didn’t exist. I was
interested in finding out about Hillary Clinton’s relationship to the
murderous dictatorship of Kazakhstan. Follow the money here …
This is a story reported by The Times, The New Yorker … an investigator
named Peter Schweizer … Seymour Hersh too. I went to Kazakhstan to check
out
these stories. A guy named Frank Giustra, who is a big resource magnate,
gave $30 million to the Clinton Foundation … Then Giustra went to
Kazakhstan
and got the exclusive agreement to mine the uranium from Kazakhstan. This
was when nuclear power was making an ugly little comeback, coming out of
its
crypt. Right after Giustra shows up, Bill Clinton shows up. This guy just
got $30 million from Giustra and shows up and he meets privately with the
president of Kazakhstan. Hmm, okay …
Hillary Clinton becomes Secretary of State, and Seymour Hersh, myself, and
others discovered that there was massive bribery paid by U.S. oil companies
to the president of Kazakhstan, Nursultan Nazarbayev. A Mobile executive
went to prison for the bribery payments, but Nazarbayev, himself, the
president of Kazakhstan who received the money, about $160 million in
bribes
… his name was never mentioned in the indictment of the bribers who went to
jail. Rather, he was listed as something called KO2, or Kazak official 2.
Now, why do we care about that? Because my inside sources at the Justice
Department told me that that was arranged by Hillary Clinton, as Secretary
of State … And, by the way, you don’t want to get on the wrong side of a
dictator, because journalists tend to end up dead in Kazakhstan for doing
that. Nazarbayev said that anyone in his nation who mentions that he is
subject of a bribery investigation, or that he had taken bribes, goes to
prison — and they are lucky if they come back out with all their fingers
on.
So what Hillary Clinton did was, by taking his name out of the indictment
and just putting in those initials KO2, it may seem minor, but what that
did
is allow this guy to clamp down, imprison, and torture journalists in his
nation who would bring up the question of bribery from oil companies. Did
Hillary Clinton do that to favor the oil companies, to stroke a
blood-thirsty oil potentate in the Caspian Sea? Or did she do that to make
sure that her foundation kept getting pleasured by Mr. Giustra?
All I wanted to do was get the information in the e-mails between Hillary
and her husband regarding this transaction. But according to Hillary
Clinton, that’s a personal message, cause it’s to her husband. Well, it’s
not really to her husband, it’s to her co-recipient of millions of dollars.
They run a business together, basically, called The Clinton Foundation, a
political operation called The Clinton Campaign. Hillary Clinton took it
not
only upon herself to withhold this information by putting it on a private
server — and here’s what really disturbs me — when she was caught and told
to turn over those e-mails, she took it upon herself to order the erasure
of
56,000 e-mails.
If you did that, Dennis, if you were subject to a federal investigation and
you erased the e-mails that were subject to that investigation, I guarantee
you this broadcast would be from a federal prison. There is zero question.
In fact, Comey, the FBI director, even said so. He said a lower official
would be in real trouble. He almost gave a lèse majesté defense, saying,
“Well, the Secretary of State can kind of make up her own rules.” No, we
are
a nation of rules. Those documents were the public’s documents, not hers.
And she definitely erased documents of public interest to keep them out of
the hands of journalists. If the standard is she’s not going to jail … is
that what we want in an open administration?
By the way, it’s not all for their foundation. Bill Clinton also got
$500,000 from Nazarbayev himself, for a talk — that’s pretty golden words.
And I wonder if it has something to do with the fact that Nazarbayev’s name
was left off the indictments? We need to know. It can’t really be up to
federal officials — whether it’s Hillary Clinton or anyone else — to simply
erase the e-mails in question. I don’t know what obstruction of justice
means anymore if that aint it.
DB: Greg, I know that you’re excited. You’ve got a screening for the new
film you’re working on, The Best Democracy Money Can Buy. It’s happening in
St. Louis, at the Netroots Nation gathering. What is Netroots Nation, by
the
way?
Palast: It’s a gathering of media and activists groups that are web-based.
It’s a well known, decades-long gathering. We’re doing a sneak preview
screening of The Best Democracy Money Can Buy: A Tale of Billionaires and
Ballot Bandits at 6 p.m. on Saturday, July 16. If you’re at Netroots
there’s
no charge, and we’re working it out so that members of the public can come
…
We’ve got Willie Nelson in there, and Rosario Dawson, but the main thing is
to make sure that the alarm goes out that there are billionaires and ballot
bandits ready to snatch the 2016 election. This is not a partisan matter,
it’s a civil rights matter. So come, we’ll have some fun, eat some popcorn
watching the dissolution of that thing that used to be called American
democracy.
________________________________________
Dennis J Bernstein is the executive producer of Flashpoints, syndicated on
Pacifica Radio, and is the recipient of a 2015 Pillar Award for his work as
a journalist whistleblower. He is most recently the author of Special Ed:
Voices from a Hidden Classroom.
Greg Palast has been called the “most important investigative reporter of
our time — up there with Woodward and Bernstein” (The Guardian). Palast has
broken front-page stories for BBC Television’s Newsnight, The Guardian, The
Nation Magazine, Rolling Stone, and Harper's Magazine. He is the author of
the New York Times bestsellers Billionaires & Ballot Bandits, Armed
Madhouse, The Best Democracy Money Can Buy, and the highly acclaimed
Vultures’ Picnic, named Book of the Year 2012 on BBC’s Newsnight Review.
His
books have been translated into two dozen languages. Palast's investigation
and production team are currently finishing the final frames of his new
film
on the theft of the 2016 election: The Best Democracy Money Can Buy: A Tale
of Billionaires and Ballot Bandits.
Reader Supported News is the Publication of Origin for this work.
Permission
to republish is freely granted with credit and a link back to Reader
Supported News.
Error! Hyperlink reference not valid. Error! Hyperlink reference not
valid.
Former secretary of state Hillary Clinton and her husband former president
Bill Clinton wait to go on stage at the Story County Democratic Picnic in
Ames, Iowa, November 15, 2015. (photo: Melina Mara/WP)
/SRCURLONE/SRCURLONE
The Clintons & a Crime Far Worse Than Missing Emails or Votes!
By Dennis J Bernstein and Greg Palast, Reader Supported News
12 July 16
t’s been an action-packed week in politics. Hillary Clinton has been given
the official all-clear by the FBI, who have said she won’t have to face
charges for the Clorox cleaning job she did on her email server. And with
her path to power given the personal red carpet treatment by FBI director
James Comey, the fact that a hundred thousand votes or so have yet to be
counted in California has been swept under the high thread count rug —
where
a lot of inconvenient votes end up these days! But the missing emails and
votes haven’t been forgotten by our resident sleuth, Greg Palast. In this
week’s Best Democracy Money Can Buy: Election Crimes Bulletin, he gives
Dennis J Bernstein the skinny on Sanders’ stolen California win, Clinton’s
bleached communications — and a multi-million dollar Kazakhstan bribery and
corruption scandal that got Cloroxed with them!
TRANSCRIPT (Originally broadcast on July 6, 2016)
Dennis Bernstein: There has been a lot going on. We’ve got the announcement
today that Hillary Clinton will not be indicted, after a little visit that
Bill had with the Attorney General. There are still some leftover results
that we’re trying to figure out in terms of what happened in California.
And
you’ve got a big event coming up. So there’s a lot to talk about. Why don’t
we start back in California?
Greg Palast: Well, I was reading something called The Washington Post,
which
is like the American Izvestia, and it said, “Greg Palast made a mistake.”
Because I had announced on your show — we’re infamous now — that 2 million
ballots were not counted when they declared Hillary Clinton the winner in
California with 100% of precincts reporting. In fact, there were 2 million
ballots that were uncounted, according to the Secretary of State, on the
night that CNN announced that 100% of the results were in. And that doesn’t
change, even if The Washington Post doubts it.
Even today, one month after the primary, over 100,000 ballots have yet to
be
counted — provisional ballots, what we call placebo ballots, which have a
danger of not being counted at all. I was also attacked in The Washington
Post — I’m not being defensive about this, I just want to correct the
record
— because I said on this show that the majority of the provisional ballots
were, given the demographics, likely Bernie Sanders voters. And I was
accused of being The Great Carnac and knowing how people voted without
seeing their ballots. No, it was demographics. In fact, of the provisional
ballots that have now been counted, exactly 75.0%, 3 out of 4 ballots, went
for Bernie Sanders.
What is a provisional ballot? … I call them placebo ballots, because they
make you think you voted when you haven’t. They let you believe you voted …
There’s a one in three chance it won’t be counted. In a high risk race, a
majority chance it will not be counted … There’s likely to be 3 million
given out in the upcoming election — far more than the margins of victory.
Supposedly Hillary Clinton initially won in California by 400,000 votes.
That margin has officially shrunk substantially. But the margin is far, far
less than the number of provisional ballots that have been given out, and,
as I projected, 75% of those that get counted go to Sanders. If you count
all the provisional ballots, all things equal, Bernie Sanders won.
DB: Well, that begs my next question: how long do you have to wait for a
vote count before it becomes irrelevant? Like how long does it take them to
count the votes to figure out what happened in Britain?
Palast: Let’s see, by 5 a.m. British time they’d counted 37 million ballots
… In California, we were waiting one month. This is Silicon Valley country,
right, and we cannot figure out how to count a bunch of pieces of paper in
over a month. Part of it is, they’re not trying to figure out how to count
these things — that’s easy. They’re trying to figure out how not to count
them. How many they can cut out, reject, and throw in the garbage … This is
the problem here. We are not counting all the ballots in the United States.
That’s why it takes so long, over a month in California, as they figure out
how many ballots they don’t want to count — that’s ugly. And when it gets
down to the rest of the nation, the racist smell of the ballot rejection is
heavy … If a ballot is thrown away as non-countable, the U.S. Civil Rights
Commission says it’s 900% more likely that voter is black than white. It’s
an apartheid vote-counting system. Everyone in America gets to vote, but
not
every color gets to have their vote counted.
DB: Well, big announcement, Hillary Clinton is not going to be indicted, at
least according to the FBI … But what does this have to do with voter
protection? This is not about one candidate or another, but this is an
important story, isn’t it?
Palast: Very. Because people know me as the guy who’s the author of The
Best
Democracy Money Can Buy and Billionaires & Ballot Bandits. And there’s a
direct relation between vote-rustling and billionaires buying up our
politics … I’m not partisan on that. Hillary Clinton’s e-mails, they
discovered that she was basically hiding them because there were Freedom of
Information Act requests for her documents from journalists like me. What
they wanted to do is tell us that these e-mails didn’t exist. I was
interested in finding out about Hillary Clinton’s relationship to the
murderous dictatorship of Kazakhstan. Follow the money here …
This is a story reported by The Times, The New Yorker … an investigator
named Peter Schweizer … Seymour Hersh too. I went to Kazakhstan to check
out
these stories. A guy named Frank Giustra, who is a big resource magnate,
gave $30 million to the Clinton Foundation … Then Giustra went to
Kazakhstan
and got the exclusive agreement to mine the uranium from Kazakhstan. This
was when nuclear power was making an ugly little comeback, coming out of
its
crypt. Right after Giustra shows up, Bill Clinton shows up. This guy just
got $30 million from Giustra and shows up and he meets privately with the
president of Kazakhstan. Hmm, okay …
Hillary Clinton becomes Secretary of State, and Seymour Hersh, myself, and
others discovered that there was massive bribery paid by U.S. oil companies
to the president of Kazakhstan, Nursultan Nazarbayev. A Mobile executive
went to prison for the bribery payments, but Nazarbayev, himself, the
president of Kazakhstan who received the money, about $160 million in
bribes
… his name was never mentioned in the indictment of the bribers who went to
jail. Rather, he was listed as something called KO2, or Kazak official 2.
Now, why do we care about that? Because my inside sources at the Justice
Department told me that that was arranged by Hillary Clinton, as Secretary
of State … And, by the way, you don’t want to get on the wrong side of a
dictator, because journalists tend to end up dead in Kazakhstan for doing
that. Nazarbayev said that anyone in his nation who mentions that he is
subject of a bribery investigation, or that he had taken bribes, goes to
prison — and they are lucky if they come back out with all their fingers
on.
So what Hillary Clinton did was, by taking his name out of the indictment
and just putting in those initials KO2, it may seem minor, but what that
did
is allow this guy to clamp down, imprison, and torture journalists in his
nation who would bring up the question of bribery from oil companies. Did
Hillary Clinton do that to favor the oil companies, to stroke a
blood-thirsty oil potentate in the Caspian Sea? Or did she do that to make
sure that her foundation kept getting pleasured by Mr. Giustra?
All I wanted to do was get the information in the e-mails between Hillary
and her husband regarding this transaction. But according to Hillary
Clinton, that’s a personal message, cause it’s to her husband. Well, it’s
not really to her husband, it’s to her co-recipient of millions of dollars.
They run a business together, basically, called The Clinton Foundation, a
political operation called The Clinton Campaign. Hillary Clinton took it
not
only upon herself to withhold this information by putting it on a private
server — and here’s what really disturbs me — when she was caught and told
to turn over those e-mails, she took it upon herself to order the erasure
of
56,000 e-mails.
If you did that, Dennis, if you were subject to a federal investigation and
you erased the e-mails that were subject to that investigation, I guarantee
you this broadcast would be from a federal prison. There is zero question.
In fact, Comey, the FBI director, even said so. He said a lower official
would be in real trouble. He almost gave a lèse majesté defense, saying,
“Well, the Secretary of State can kind of make up her own rules.” No, we
are
a nation of rules. Those documents were the public’s documents, not hers.
And she definitely erased documents of public interest to keep them out of
the hands of journalists. If the standard is she’s not going to jail … is
that what we want in an open administration?
By the way, it’s not all for their foundation. Bill Clinton also got
$500,000 from Nazarbayev himself, for a talk — that’s pretty golden words.
And I wonder if it has something to do with the fact that Nazarbayev’s name
was left off the indictments? We need to know. It can’t really be up to
federal officials — whether it’s Hillary Clinton or anyone else — to simply
erase the e-mails in question. I don’t know what obstruction of justice
means anymore if that aint it.
DB: Greg, I know that you’re excited. You’ve got a screening for the new
film you’re working on, The Best Democracy Money Can Buy. It’s happening in
St. Louis, at the Netroots Nation gathering. What is Netroots Nation, by
the
way?
Palast: It’s a gathering of media and activists groups that are web-based.
It’s a well known, decades-long gathering. We’re doing a sneak preview
screening of The Best Democracy Money Can Buy: A Tale of Billionaires and
Ballot Bandits at 6 p.m. on Saturday, July 16. If you’re at Netroots
there’s
no charge, and we’re working it out so that members of the public can come
…
We’ve got Willie Nelson in there, and Rosario Dawson, but the main thing is
to make sure that the alarm goes out that there are billionaires and ballot
bandits ready to snatch the 2016 election. This is not a partisan matter,
it’s a civil rights matter. So come, we’ll have some fun, eat some popcorn
watching the dissolution of that thing that used to be called American
democracy.
Dennis J Bernstein is the executive producer of Flashpoints, syndicated on
Pacifica Radio, and is the recipient of a 2015 Pillar Award for his work as
a journalist whistleblower. He is most recently the author of Special Ed:
Voices from a Hidden Classroom.
Greg Palast has been called the “most important investigative reporter of
our time — up there with Woodward and Bernstein” (The Guardian). Palast has
broken front-page stories for BBC Television’s Newsnight, The Guardian, The
Nation Magazine, Rolling Stone, and Harper's Magazine. He is the author of
the New York Times bestsellers Billionaires & Ballot Bandits, Armed
Madhouse, The Best Democracy Money Can Buy, and the highly acclaimed
Vultures’ Picnic, named Book of the Year 2012 on BBC’s Newsnight Review.
His
books have been translated into two dozen languages. Palast's investigation
and production team are currently finishing the final frames of his new
film
on the theft of the 2016 election: The Best Democracy Money Can Buy: A Tale
of Billionaires and Ballot Bandits.
Reader Supported News is the Publication of Origin for this work.
Permission
to republish is freely granted with credit and a link back to Reader
Supported News.
http://e-max.it/posizionamento-siti-web/socialize
http://e-max.it/posizionamento-siti-web/socialize
