Supreme Court Decision Expands LGBTQ Job Protections To All 50 States
https://socialistaction.org/2020/06/24/supreme-court-decision-expands-lgbtq-job-protections-to-all-50-states/
June 24, 2020
By ANN MONTAGUE
On June 15, the U.S. Supreme Court by a wide 6-3 margin immediately
expanded job protections to LGBTQ workers in 23 states where none had
existed. Over the past decades, some states had included bans on
employment discrimination. Many union contracts included protections.
But in those 23 states few workers have unions, and workers are
routinely fired with no grounds for legal redress when based solely on
their sexual orientation or gender identity.
The strategy of the case was unique and not complex. It revolved around
the word “sex” in a law that had long been accepted as a bulwark against
discrimination in the United States. The Supreme Court decision
reflected that simplicity in its brevity and clarity.
The question of whether the word “sex” includes sexual orientation and
gender identity was clarified in the decision written by President
Trump’s first Supreme Court nominee, Justice Neil Gorsuch: “It is
impossible to discriminate against a person for being homosexual or
transgender without discriminating against that individual based on sex.
An employer who fired an individual for being homosexual or transgender
fires that person for traits or actions it would not have questioned in
members of a different sex. Sex plays a necessary and undisguisable role
in the decision, exactly what Title VII [of the Civil Rights Act] forbids.”
The court also specifically upheld rulings of lower courts that said
sexual orientation discrimination was a form of sex discrimination.
This decision is broader and ultimately more far reaching than two
previous decisions. In 2003 Lawrence v. Texas established the
constitutional right to private sexual expression. The 2015 decision in
Obergefell v. Hodges established the constitutional right to marry. The
right to have sex and the right to marry in no way protected workers
from discrimination in the workplace.
The Plaintiffs
Gerald Bostock was a social worker for Clayton County Georgia who was
fired after he joined a gay softball league. Donald Zarda was a
skydiving instructor who was fired by Altitude Express after mentioning
being gay. Aimee Stephens was fired by R.G. & G.R. Funeral Home. She
presented as male when she was hired. After she informed her employer
she planned to “live and work full-time as a woman,” she was fired. Her
employer said she violated the dress code and said, “this is not going
to work.”
The plaintiffs claimed their employers had violated Title VII of the
1964 Civil Rights Act, which prohibits discrimination based on “race,
color, religion, sex or national origin.”
The central dispute was the word “sex.”
The Civil Rights Act was created in the midst of the struggle for Black
Liberation and a year after Martin Luther King’s March On Washington for
Jobs and Freedom. Chief organizers of the march were A. Phillip
Randolph, a union organizer who founded the Brotherhood of Sleeping Car
Porters, and openly gay civil rights activist Bayard Rustin.
The question of whether to even add sex as a protected class to the 1964
Civil Rights Bill created controversy from the beginning. Segregationist
Rep. Howard Smith, Democrat from Virginia thought that adding “sex”
would sound so ridiculous that it would derail the passage of the entire
bill. He clearly underestimated the effect of the growing women’s
liberation movement.
This Was a Working Class Fight
The fact that job protections often took the back seat to marriage
rights reflects the money and power of a few national organizations.
They were successful and marriage equality became the law of the land in
all fifty states. A popular slogan which ridiculed the situation they
created became widespread: “Now we can get married on one day and get
fired the next”.
Some lobbying organizations were just currying favor with Democrats
and raising money. But from the beginning the struggle for workplace
rights had always been front and center for workers.
That long struggle did not start with individuals being fired because
they were discovered to be gay. It started because lesbians and gay men
were facing mass firings that started in the U.S. State Department. This
was an integral part of the Cold War anti-Communist witch hunts. (“The
Lavender Scare: The Cold War Persecution of Gays and Lesbians in the
Federal Government” by David Kay Johnston)
In 1957 Frank Kameny, an astronomer in the U.S. Army Map Service, was
fired for being gay. A few years later, Kameny and Barbara Giddings,
founder of the Daughters of Bilitis the first lesbian civil rights
organization, joined together to initiate a series of nationwide visible
gay protests. One of the most prominent was a 1965 picket in front of
the White House.
As the gay liberation movement spread across the country so did the
mantra, “come out, come out, wherever you are”. At the same time rank
and file stewards, organizers and leaders in unions started coming out
and engaging with their co-workers. They bargained contract language to
protect gays, lesbians and trans workers in their jobs and fought for
equal health benefits. They followed it up with training stewards on the
new contract language and going to bat for their co-workers. (“Out In
The Union: A Labor History Of Queer America” by Miriam Frank)
Myths About the Supreme Court
Some people were surprised that the majority decision was written by
Justice Neil Gorsuch and supported by Chief Justice John Roberts. There
is a myth that the justices exist in an isolated cloister apart from
society and immune to pressure by social movements. This has never been
true. In addition, the Democrats’ incessant cry to the working class
that they must vote for the “lesser evil” – because Democrats will
appoint justices who are more “progressive” – is also not true. Note
that the same week as the decision regarding expansion of job
protections there was another decision. Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Stephen
Breyer, both appointed by Democrat Bill Clinton, voted with the majority
which upheld a permit for a controversial $8 billion gas pipeline that
will tunnel below the famous Appalachian Trail.
The 1973 Roe v. Wade decision that women have a fundamental right to
decide whether or not to have an abortion without government restriction
came from a conservative court. It was a 7-2 decision with all
Republican appointed justices voting in the majority and the one
Democratic appointee voted “no.”
What is true is the effect a strong independent movement can have on
court decisions. Roe v. Wade came at the time when a militant women’s
liberation movement was on the rise. Today there is an unprecedented
mass movement erupting against police brutality in small towns as well
as large cities throughout the nation. These mobilizations are
continuing and only getting stronger as the rebellion expands against
injustice and in some cases questioning the capitalist system itself.
This is a time of fighting back
At the center of the expansion of job protections decision is the 1964
Civil Rights Act. This decision came in the midst of weeks of protests
against systemic racism and violence directed at Black men and women.
The very people this act was supposed to protect but instead now
represents the years of “reform” that has failed.
Housing and Healthcare
There are additional areas of discrimination that this decision does not
cover. The lawyers in this case believe that because federal law already
prohibits sex discrimination in housing through the Fair Housing Act,
that should end housing discrimination in all 50 states based on sexual
orientation and gender identity.
Healthcare may be more challenging but also there is a possibility of a
broad-based movement in this case. While it is true that President Trump
is stripping away protections for trans persons, the attack is also much
broader. The Trump Administration reversed the Health and Human Services
(HHS) rule which prohibited discrimination in healthcare. This means
denial of healthcare or healthcare coverage based on pregnancy, gender
identity and sexual orientation is no longer prohibited. New exemptions
have been added that allow healthcare providers to invoke religious
objections to service provision. Healthcare providers must now comply
with the Religious Freedom Restoration Act.
This harms women seeking abortions as well as allowing discrimination on
the basis of gender identity and sexual orientation. The victory here
belongs to the religious right who are waging a war on women and LGBTQ
people against the principle that health care is a human right.
It is time for a united, broad-based movement to demand: No Exceptions!
Healthcare Is A Human Right! Free Universal Healthcare For All!
Stand Up, Fight Back!
This is a time of general defiance and a new generation experiencing the
power of independent mass movements. Laws and court decisions are only
pieces of paper if the struggles don’t continue. Those 23 states who
just heard they cannot discriminate will not just change because of a
court decision. The capitalist class benefits from divisions in the
working class. Now is the time for workers to unite: An Injury To One Is
An Injury To All!
Socialist Action News
Sign up for our weekly newsletter:
Your email address
Related Articles
Meatpacking Workers Attacked by COVID-19
June 6, 2020
By DON HARMON
Workers at meatpacking plants are suffering extremely high levels of
coronavirus infection, due to lack of protection, while the plants
become hotspots for widespread outbreaks in their towns and cities.
COVID-19 and NYC Transit Worker Hell
June 4, 2020
By MARTY GOODMAN
Over 130 New York City transit workers have died of COVID-19 with MTA
doing little to protect the largely Black, Latino, and immigrant
workforce. As one train conductor says, “We are not essential. We are
sacrificial.”
Dr. Anthony Fauci and the Gay Community: Then and Now
June 1, 2020
Today Dr. Fauci is well known as a trusted scientist who is trying to
guide the country through a pandemic. Gay men and lesbians who were
involved in fighting the AIDS epidemic knew Dr. Fauci as a more complex
figure in their struggle with the head of the NIAID.
--
___
Carl Sagan
“Every aspect of Nature reveals a deep mystery and touches our sense of wonder
and awe. Those afraid of the universe as it really is, those who pretend to
nonexistent knowledge and envision a Cosmos centered on human beings will
prefer the fleeting comforts of superstition. They avoid rather than confront
the world. But those with the courage to explore the weave and structure of the
Cosmos, even where it differs profoundly from their wishes and prejudices, will
penetrate its deepest mysteries.”
― Carl Sagan, Cosmos
